@ajdotcom.bsky.social
Reposted
Worth remembering when looking at the horrific scenes in the US right now that both Reform and the Tories have pledged to bring in ICE-style organisations to the UK if they win power
January 24, 2026 at 10:33 PM
Worth remembering when looking at the horrific scenes in the US right now that both Reform and the Tories have pledged to bring in ICE-style organisations to the UK if they win power
Reposted
I am extremely confused as to why the UK government and police are saying Grok’s mass-scale CSAM generation is an issue for Ofcom.
This isn’t about X failing to moderate CSAM, which is an Online Safety Act issue. It is about the company and its technology being actively involved in its generation.
This isn’t about X failing to moderate CSAM, which is an Online Safety Act issue. It is about the company and its technology being actively involved in its generation.
January 7, 2026 at 7:37 AM
I am extremely confused as to why the UK government and police are saying Grok’s mass-scale CSAM generation is an issue for Ofcom.
This isn’t about X failing to moderate CSAM, which is an Online Safety Act issue. It is about the company and its technology being actively involved in its generation.
This isn’t about X failing to moderate CSAM, which is an Online Safety Act issue. It is about the company and its technology being actively involved in its generation.
Reposted
A true crackdown on set piece holding would lead to three or four additional penalties a match and Arsenal would be MAJOR beneficiaries becuase Arsenal attackers get held on every single corner.
Somehow, I don't think it's going to play out like that, though.
Somehow, I don't think it's going to play out like that, though.
“Cracking down on set piece holding” is the hardest thing to apply consistently because there’s some holding on every set piece. Once again it’s evidence of PGMOL’s prime directive: find ways the chalk off goals. They’re absolutely out of their minds.
August 14, 2025 at 1:18 PM
A true crackdown on set piece holding would lead to three or four additional penalties a match and Arsenal would be MAJOR beneficiaries becuase Arsenal attackers get held on every single corner.
Somehow, I don't think it's going to play out like that, though.
Somehow, I don't think it's going to play out like that, though.
Reposted
has the ref just stopped the game for a non-head injury?
April 29, 2025 at 8:30 PM
has the ref just stopped the game for a non-head injury?
this ref is a nonce
April 29, 2025 at 7:45 PM
this ref is a nonce
Reposted
“The loss of U.S. support may mean 75 million children do not receive routine vaccinations in the next five years, with more than 1.2 million children dying as a result.”
1.2 million children dying.
Abhorrent. Evil. Indefensible.
1.2 million children dying.
Abhorrent. Evil. Indefensible.
U.S. to End Vaccine Funds for Poor Countries
A 281-page spreadsheet obtained by The Times lists the Trump administration’s plans for thousands of foreign aid programs.
www.nytimes.com
March 26, 2025 at 3:20 PM
“The loss of U.S. support may mean 75 million children do not receive routine vaccinations in the next five years, with more than 1.2 million children dying as a result.”
1.2 million children dying.
Abhorrent. Evil. Indefensible.
1.2 million children dying.
Abhorrent. Evil. Indefensible.
Reposted
time to dig up the @adamkotsko.bsky.social tweet
February 16, 2025 at 2:58 PM
time to dig up the @adamkotsko.bsky.social tweet
Reposted
supreme court rn
February 14, 2025 at 4:05 PM
supreme court rn
Reposted
It’s because the stated role of vAR is referee mistake focused (clear and obvious etc) NOT correct decision focused.
So you can have things that are clearly on review a foul or whatever, but because it doesn’t fit some criteria on whether it was a reasonable mistake they pretend they can’t see it
So you can have things that are clearly on review a foul or whatever, but because it doesn’t fit some criteria on whether it was a reasonable mistake they pretend they can’t see it
January 26, 2025 at 6:25 PM
It’s because the stated role of vAR is referee mistake focused (clear and obvious etc) NOT correct decision focused.
So you can have things that are clearly on review a foul or whatever, but because it doesn’t fit some criteria on whether it was a reasonable mistake they pretend they can’t see it
So you can have things that are clearly on review a foul or whatever, but because it doesn’t fit some criteria on whether it was a reasonable mistake they pretend they can’t see it
Reposted
Reposted
