1CM69
LightNews LightNews
banner
1cm69.uk
1CM69
@1cm69.uk
81 followers 260 following 750 posts
Posts Replies Media Videos
Pinned
1cm69.uk
1CM69 @1cm69.uk · Jan 26
#EndFascism
#EndTrump
#EndElon
#EndMusk
#EndAllNazis
#EndMETA
#EndAmazon
#EndTesla
#EndStarlink

auto post
1cm69.uk
Very sad news, I enjoyed Dawsons Creek back in the day, when the world seemed a simpler, safer place.

#RIPJames

Dawson's Creek star James Van Der Beek dies aged 48 www.bbc.co.uk/news/article...
James Van Der Beek, Dawson's Creek actor, dies aged 48
The father of six starred in multiple popular shows and films in the late 1990s and early 2000s, including Dawson's Creek and Varsity Blues.
www.bbc.co.uk
February 11, 2026 at 9:10 PM
1cm69.uk
Opening scenes from #Cross s2 ep1, brilliant, get all the pedo million/billionaires on an island and burn the fuckers
February 11, 2026 at 8:34 PM
Reposted by 1CM69
physgal.bsky.social
LOL 🎢 This is what it should look like.
Correctly wired UK three-prong electrical plug
February 8, 2026 at 6:04 PM
Reposted by 1CM69
merrdiff.bsky.social
Really can't make this stuff up

I did not have a fast-tracked FCC application for an actual megaconstellation (1 million satellites) justified as "taking the first step towards becoming a Kardashev Il-level civilization" on my 2026 bingo card

What are we doing friends
Federal Communications Commission 45 L Street NE Washington, DC 20554 News Media Information 202-418-0500 Internet: www.fcc.gov DA 26-113 Released: February 4, 2026 SPACE BUREAU ACCEPTS FOR FILING SPACEX'S APPLICATION FOR ORBITAL DATA CENTERS ICFS File No. SAT-LOA-20260108-00016 Comments/Petitions Due: March 6, 2026 Response to Comments/Oppositions to Petition Due: March 16, 2026 Replies to Responses/Oppositions Due: March 23, 2026 By this Public Notice, the Space Bureau (Bureau) accepts for filing and seeks comment on an application by Space Exploration Holdings, LLC (SpaceX) for a new non-geostationary orbit (NGSO) system of up to one million satellites. This satellite system will represent the "first step towards becoming a Kardashev Il-level civilization - one that can harness the Sun's full power," according to SpaceX. On January 30, 2026, SpaceX filed an application seeking authority to launch and operate a new NGSO satellite system of up to one million satellites to operate as the "Space Orbital Data Center system" (System). The System will operate at altitudes ranging from 500 km to 2,000 km and in 30 degree and sun-synchronous orbit inclinations within orbital shells spanning up to 50 km each. The proposed satellites will use high-bandwidth optical inter-satellite links and conduct telemetry, tracking, and command (TT&C) operations.* The Bureau seeks comment on the application and the associated requests for waiver.
February 5, 2026 at 3:33 AM
1cm69.uk
KL PIGGY 🐷
February 4, 2026 at 6:43 PM
Reposted by 1CM69
joncooper-us.bsky.social
👇👇👇👇
February 2, 2026 at 6:10 PM
1cm69.uk
What a complete fucking Tit, when is this twat going to stop this pathetic nonsense.

Musk's SpaceX applies to launch 1m satellites into orbit www.bbc.co.uk/news/article...
Elon Musk's SpaceX applies to launch 1m satellites into orbit
The firm wants to create a network of
www.bbc.co.uk
January 31, 2026 at 9:40 PM
Reposted by 1CM69
ledbydonkeys.org
President Trump, your Melania movie has bombed
January 30, 2026 at 8:01 PM
1cm69.uk
Just finished watching S3E14 of Northern Exposure, oddly prophetic words from Chris at KBHR, considering current happenings in the US.
January 27, 2026 at 7:35 PM
1cm69.uk
Another HomePod repair, new Sub & Logic Board #Apple #HomePod
January 25, 2026 at 11:43 AM
1cm69.uk
Not so “Sweet Karoline” 🤮
January 23, 2026 at 5:10 PM
1cm69.uk
Given up on #StarTrek #StarfleetAcademy halfway through ep3, just can’t watch it, the audio is terrible, everyone except a few sound like they’re talking through clenched teeth, awful.
January 22, 2026 at 7:51 PM
1cm69.uk
Trump & Greenland

I never want to endow Trump with even an ounce of intelligence & he is probably the puppet being controlled by the people around him but surely the Greenland thing was just market manipulation again with a splash of popularity raising thrown in.
January 22, 2026 at 6:48 AM
Reposted by 1CM69
adamkeiper.com
Trump repeatedly said "Iceland" when he meant Greenland in his Davos rant. But his press secretary is just blatantly lying about it.
Screenshot of a tweet from @PressSec dated 21 Jan 2026, reading as follows: No he didn’t, Libby. His written remarks referred to Greenland as a “piece of ice” because that’s what it is. You’re the only one mixing anything up here.
January 21, 2026 at 5:58 PM
Reposted by 1CM69
therealjackhopkins.bsky.social
There is no bottom to what these people will do…right out in the open.
January 21, 2026 at 3:28 PM
1cm69.uk
@standupmaths.bsky.social spooky coincidence in my podcast timeline today 🤔
January 20, 2026 at 12:15 PM
Reposted by 1CM69
nycjayjay.bsky.social
This week’s Just for Skeets and Giggles is out! Have a great weekend. open.substack.com/pub/statusku...
January 17, 2026 at 5:20 PM
1cm69.uk
Watching Starfleet Academy, very good so far but seems like the audio engineers went way too heavy ‘de-essing’, sound like everyone has a lisp, lots of ‘shh’ in place of ‘ess’
January 15, 2026 at 8:34 PM
Reposted by 1CM69
profrachelgan.bsky.social
Following coverage over the weekend of Sir Paul Nurse's comments that suggested that the only reason that a Fellow should be expelled from @royalsociety.org is scientific misconduct, I have written to him to explain the risks such an attitude poses of increasing sexual harassment in STEM.
Dear Sir Paul, Re: Royal Society Code of Conduct I am sure that many scientists have written to you about the specific question of Elon Musk’s Fellowship and whether, under the Royal Society’s Code of Conduct, his retaining that Fellowship is appropriate. I will not rehash these issues. Instead, as a female scientist with extensive experience of activities aiming to increase equality, diversity and inclusion in the engineering and physical sciences sector, I am writing to you (in a personal capacity) to ask you to reconsider the statements you have recently made in this context to the UK press about the Royal Society’s Code of Conduct and how it is applied. A 2018 report from the joint National Academies of the United States of America, concluded that “sexual harassment is common in academic science, engineering, and medicine” and that “greater than 50 percent of women faculty and staff and 20–50 percent of women students encounter or experience sexually harassing conduct in academia”. This report described codes of conduct that make clear that sexual harassment is unethical and will not be tolerated as a “powerful incentive for change”. The authors also noted that sexual harassment can have significant and damaging effects on the integrity of research. In my own praxis, I have found that clear and consistently-implemented codes of conduct that address these issues make female scientists and engineers safer, and allow them to focus more effectively on their research. For codes of conduct to have such a positive effect, it is vital that sanctions for actions which transgress the code are meaningful and substantial. I was hence aghast to realise that in an interview with the Financial Times published on 9/1/26, you appear to have suggested that the Royal Society “should only expel fellows if their science proved “faulty or fraudulent or highly defective””. Moreover, in a further interview with the Guardian on 11/1/26 you suggested that the code “may need to be looked at again”, with the implication that your aim would be to remove the option of sanctions on Fellows for reasons not strictly related to faults or defects in their research. I suggest that changing the Royal Society’s code of conduct so that the likelihood of serious sanctions for sexual harassment is reduced, would directly endanger women who interact with the Royal Society at events or otherwise, and would provide a licence to harass to the already powerful people on whom the Society bestows fellowship. The implications of your words - that under your leadership the only infringements of the code which are likely to receive the sanction of the Fellowship being removed are those related to research misconduct - already risk empowering harassers. You stated, in the Financial Times interview, that “there’s many bad people around, but they have made scientific advances”. Given this awareness of the possibility of bad actors in our scientific community, it is wholly irresponsible to suggest that the Royal Society would not act to sanction these people if they harass more vulnerable scientists. I am hence writing to request that you retract any suggestion that the Society’s Code of Conduct should be changed so that the only reason a Fellow might be sanctioned by the removal of their Fellowship is “faulty or fraudulent or highly defective” research. This action is necessary to safeguard female scientists, a requirement placed on the Society by safeguarding legislation and UK statutory guidance. Yours sincerely, Professor Rachel A. Oliver.
January 12, 2026 at 8:59 AM
1cm69.uk
So, how many wars is Trump saying he has stopped now?!

Fucking tyrant
January 3, 2026 at 8:00 AM
1cm69.uk
@starstryder.space hi, is there any way you are able to stop these auto recommendations about this so called ‘Guru’s’ podcast from appearing every time an Astronomy Cast episode is released, highly annoying to be pestered every week by it, many thanks.
December 29, 2025 at 10:13 PM
Reposted by 1CM69
theguardian.com
Chris Rea, rock and blues singer-songwriter, dies aged 74
Chris Rea, rock and blues singer-songwriter, dies aged 74
Middlesbrough-born musician had hits with Driving Home for Christmas, On the Beach and The Road to Hell Chris Rea, the British singer-songwriter whose hits included Driving Home For Christmas, has died at the age of 74, a spokesperson for his family said. The statement said that he died “peacefully in hospital … following a short illness”. Continue reading...
www.theguardian.com
December 22, 2025 at 3:15 PM
Reposted by 1CM69
astromikemerri.bsky.social
When Avi says “to within 9 degrees,” he actually means “9 degrees away from.” He then commits the gross statistical error of using this measured value to specify the radius of a circle on sky to assign a probability.

Does he really not understand basic statistical inference? 🧪🔭
November 24, 2025 at 12:21 PM
Reposted by 1CM69
georgetakei.bsky.social
This is the best takedown of Musk I’ve ever read. From a beloved author around my age no less, Joyce Carol Oates.
A tweet from Joyce Carol Oates (@JoyceCarolOates) reads: “So curious that such a wealthy man never posts anything that indicates that he enjoys or is even aware of what virtually everyone appreciates—scenes from nature, pet dog or cat, praise for a movie, music, a book (but doubt that he reads); pride in a friend’s or relative’s accomplishment; condolences for someone who has died; pleasure in sports, acclaim for a favorite team; references to history. In fact he seems totally uneducated, uncultured. The poorest persons on Twitter may have access to more beauty & meaning in life than the ‘most wealthy person in the world.’” The tweet is written in white text on a black background, typical of X (Twitter).
November 12, 2025 at 6:35 PM
Reposted by 1CM69
brooklynmarie.bsky.social
The billionaire who gave the military money was Timothy Mellon and if you're an obsessive tracker of the eugenicist Tanton network that's invaded our government like I am you will have immediately recognized that name, that's Mellon as in Mellon Scaife www.sourcewatch.org/index.php/Sc...
Scaife Foundations - SourceWatch
www.sourcewatch.org
October 25, 2025 at 8:05 PM