Martin McKee
martinmckee.bsky.social
Martin McKee
@martinmckee.bsky.social

Prof of European Public Health LSHTM
Co-Director European Observatory on Health Systems & Policy
Member Independent SAGE
Past President BMA & EUPHA
Committed to 🇬🇧 rejoining 🇪🇺

https://www.lshtm.ac.uk/aboutus/people/mckee.martin .. more

Clifford Martin McKee, CBE, is professor of European public health at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.

Source: Wikipedia
Public Health 40%
Medicine 24%

Reposted by Martin McKee

When whatever happens at the top of the Labour Party finally happens and given the sorry mess that British politics has been for years, is it maybe time to fix a broken system? Get rid of the “two party politics” delusion? Embrace PR? It’s apparently good enough for Scotland, Wales and N Ireland.

Thanks!

We @obshealth.bsky.social will no longer post on the other place. We cannot support its racism, misogyny, and hatred.
For evidence for health policy in Europe you can find us here and on LinkedIn

We @obshealth.bsky.social will no longer post on the other place. We cannot support its racism, misogyny, and hatred.
For evidence for health policy in Europe you can find us here and on LinkedIn

So true. And by acting as agents of (often dysfunctional and corrupt) states, we undermine our legitimacy with the public. Once again, we should look to Virchow: "the physician is the natural attorney of the poor,"

3/ Europe learned, at unimaginable cost, what happens when universal norms collapse. That history gives us a duty now: defend multilateralism, defend human dignity, and call out governments that put power before people. Silence is complicity.

2/ We look to a European philosopher, Immanuel Kant. Kant reminds us: if policies can’t be universalised, they’re immoral. Hoarding vaccines, ignoring treaties, and treating people as tools of foreign policy isn’t just unethical, it destroys the very cooperation pandemics demand.
🧵1/ Global health is under attack, and not just by pathogens. Governments are walking away from international law, blocking humanitarian access, and even targeting health workers. We need a principled response, which @tiagocorreia.bsky.social & I set out in an editorial in Eur J Public Health

Brava Italia. Una cerimonia di apertura olimpica davvero fantastica!
🇮🇹

Agree - I was reflecting on how things seem to work, not how they should. As I think you know, I feel that British politics are completely broken, and it’s likely to get a lot worse.

academic.oup.com/jpubhealth/a...
Brexit is just a symptom: the constitutional weaknesses it reveals have serious consequences for health
Abstract. Brexit has direct and indirect negative health consequences, whether from economic damage or from the political paralysis and distraction from pu
academic.oup.com

Reposted by Elizabeth Stokoe

Kudos to @jdmunday.bsky.social & other authors of this really elegant study of viral transmission in schools. 👇
Indoor air quality is very important, something we on @independentsage.bsky.social argued strongly during pandemic. Ventilation matters.
Our paper modelling transmission risk in schools is published in Nature Communications. **The relative contribution of close-proximity contacts, shared classroom exposure and indoor air quality to respiratory virus transmission in schools** doi.org/10.1038/s414...

5/ Each understood that control of message and discipline of the machine matter more than ideology alone. Both show that British politics often turns not on speechmakers, but on the operators who decide who speaks, and how.

4/ Bracken was Churchill’s fixer and media strategist in wartime; McSweeney has been Starmer’s enforcer and architect of Labour’s organisational reset.

3/ Neither fits the classic mould of a charismatic front-stage politician. Their real influence lay behind the scenes, shaping leaders rather than seeking applause.

2/ Both were Irish-born outsiders who rose to the very centre of British political power, not by rhetoric, but by organisation, loyalty, and strategic nous.

🧵1/ I’m not 1st to note parallel (I think @samfr.bsky.social was) but while Morgan McSweeney and Brendan Bracken are a century apart, there are striking parallels in how they wield power in British politics.

Me too

5/ Each understood that control of message and discipline of the machine matter more than ideology alone.

4/ Bracken was Churchill’s fixer and media strategist in wartime; McSweeney has been Starmer’s enforcer and architect of Labour’s organisational reset.

3/ Neither fits the classic mould of a charismatic front-stage politician. Their real influence lay behind the scenes, shaping leaders rather than seeking applause.

2/ Both were Irish-born outsiders who rose to the very centre of British political power, not by rhetoric, but by organisation, loyalty, and strategic nous.

The problem with following @davidallengreen.bsky.social is that some phrases start to act as triggers, like “For the avoidance of doubt”, which admittedly only occurs once in this ISC letter
The ISC has published its letter to the PM regarding how it will handle the Mandelson papers. It is a carefully worded and fascinating document not least because the ISC has a statutory relationship with the executive but has unusually been asked to carry out a job by Parliament.

Reposted by Martin McKee

The ISC has published its letter to the PM regarding how it will handle the Mandelson papers. It is a carefully worded and fascinating document not least because the ISC has a statutory relationship with the executive but has unusually been asked to carry out a job by Parliament.
Nigel Farage tells GB News that Keir Starmer's decision to appoint Peter Mandelson as US ambassador shows his judgement is "seriously wrong" and he should stand down as Prime Minister.

Here's what Farage said when Mandelson was appointed
Our paper modelling transmission risk in schools is published in Nature Communications. **The relative contribution of close-proximity contacts, shared classroom exposure and indoor air quality to respiratory virus transmission in schools** doi.org/10.1038/s414...

See also superb piece making case for valuing migrants in NY Times

www.nytimes.com/2026/02/04/o...

There are many questions about Mandelson’s appointment as US Ambassador but, for me, the most important is whether the Trump administration exerted any influence. Meanwhile, Conservatives ask why vetting didn’t check with US DoJ. Assume they expect U.K. to check with KGB on next ambassador to Moscow

Only a little… why not append the actual deal to the letter?