SPOOKY Ventastica
LightNews LightNews
banner
ventastica.bsky.social
SPOOKY Ventastica
@ventastica.bsky.social
230 followers 700 following 1.3K posts
PFP by rosiamn.bsky.social !! :3

they/he, 20 | trans rights are human rights | stuck in the uk and hating it | I retweet spicy content and kinks of all kinds - EXPECT WEIRD & COOL SHIT! 🔞🌶 | FREE PALESTINE, from the river to the sea.
Posts Replies Media Videos
Reposted by SPOOKY Ventastica
kodamagrey.bsky.social
Today is transgender day of remembrance, so remember to love the trans people in your life because you never know when you might lose them 💚

#tdor
November 20, 2025 at 6:22 PM
Reposted by SPOOKY Ventastica
acvalens.com
More women should be huge (300ft tall)
November 23, 2025 at 6:27 PM
Reposted by SPOOKY Ventastica
yeeniebeans.fiskiper.art
If you see this, post a monster 👀👹
Fun collab I did with babygirl @fiskdisk.fiskiper.art a couple years ago!

I did the storyboarding, she laid down the lines and flat colors, and I did the painting/rendering (including the drippy Sulyvahn Beast maw juice, is my monsterfuckery obvious enough?)
November 25, 2025 at 9:49 PM
Reposted by SPOOKY Ventastica
smashmat.bsky.social
Toppling over, a series of fortunate mishaps painting a picture around the bodies affected, dripping fluids correlating with intent and a sense of polarity in action, thus taking steps back it’s all spread and revealed fully, an entire meal ready for enjoyment: cunning predators
November 25, 2025 at 10:15 PM
Reposted by SPOOKY Ventastica
peppergiz.bsky.social
My boyfriend made a TALL (8'1) MATURE (68) WOMAN BADASS OC

I KNEW WHAT I HAD TO DO
November 25, 2025 at 7:33 PM
Reposted by SPOOKY Ventastica
chaide.bsky.social
November 21, 2025 at 5:55 AM
Reposted by SPOOKY Ventastica
phorrums.bsky.social
I misread this image so badly that I can only really hope to illustrate what I saw.

( Also a good excuse for an #art study )
A digital drawing referencing the quoted image. In the style of an early 20th century drawing, a woman in a dress holds a minigun. The text above is changed to read "Does the minigun make women cruel?"
November 23, 2025 at 10:06 PM
Reposted by SPOOKY Ventastica
revolverunit.bsky.social
Great engineering minds are hard at work
Repeated Failure Yesterday at 1:35 PM The Rent Reducer 9000: A gun in a box disguising it as a free little library. A raspberry pi scrapes Zillow for open houses nearby. During open house hours, it tells a starter pistol/cap gun to fire a few times. Seen here at an art thing I brought it to.
November 24, 2025 at 4:53 AM
Reposted by SPOOKY Ventastica
antlervel.vet
The real and true story of why Police Squad (the TV series Naked Gun was based on and easily the funniest tv show of its time) was canceled is legitimately insane and one of the most egregious examples of TV malpractice I’ve ever heard:
ABC announced the cancellation of Police Squad! after four of its six episodes had aired in March 1982. The final two episodes were aired that summer. In an interview for the DVD release of the series, Nielsen said ABC entertainment president Tony Thomopoulos asserted Police Squad! was canceled because viewers had to pay close attention to the show in order to get much of the humor: "the viewer had to watch it in order to appreciate it"
November 24, 2025 at 3:09 PM
Reposted by SPOOKY Ventastica
supergreatfriend.bsky.social
Playing Robot Alchemic Drive and thinking about Eva put this image in my head, and I had to draw it. How's Nanao gonna get a job now?!
Nanao, having achieved her true angelic form, laments that the Third Impact will make finding a job especially difficult.
January 15, 2025 at 12:00 AM
Reposted by SPOOKY Ventastica
hhonchkrow234.bsky.social
wolf girl
November 25, 2025 at 5:32 PM
Reposted by SPOOKY Ventastica
corromon.bsky.social
I really shouldn't take the glasses off lol

#Roe #furry #furryart #corrosart
November 25, 2025 at 2:41 PM
Reposted by SPOOKY Ventastica
nessiemooo.bsky.social
blush 🩸
“what a beautiful night… nothing could make it better, don’t you agree?” …no. i’m starving. I need to get the blood flowing (out loud:) “no” “mhm… you were right. tha-“ “…oh!” “You okay? you need some water?” “no!!! thank you!” … i’ll starve. FIN
November 25, 2025 at 3:58 PM
Reposted by SPOOKY Ventastica
wandwess.bsky.social
Do you like his sweater?🩷
November 25, 2025 at 4:19 PM
Reposted by SPOOKY Ventastica
remanedur.bsky.social
do u like it on him
November 25, 2025 at 3:13 PM
Reposted by SPOOKY Ventastica
shunningground.bsky.social
Suppression Field - Haunting the Scheme #newmusic #industrial #hardcore #techno #breakcore #noise

shunningground.bandcamp.com/album/haunti...
Haunting the Scheme, by Suppression Field
2 track album
shunningground.bandcamp.com
November 24, 2025 at 12:44 AM
Reposted by SPOOKY Ventastica
vickyacab.bsky.social
The only truly irreversible thing a trans child is likely to do is take their own life. "What if they do something irreversible?" actually means "theyre not allowed to make a decision!"

You cant undo or reverse any decision you make, you can simply change your mind later and handle the consequences
November 22, 2025 at 11:57 AM
Reposted by SPOOKY Ventastica
dieworkwear.bsky.social
In my article, I quoted something from Stuart Hall's "Culture, Community, Nation," an essay first published in a 1993 issue of Cultural Studies. He writes:

"It should not be necessary to look, walk, feel, think, speak exactly like a paid-up member of the buttoned-up, stiff-upper-lipped, ...
In the early 1990s, Stuart Hall, a Jamaican-born British cultural theorist, wrote about the challenges thrown up by conflicting definitions of culture, community, and nation. As Hall notes, “common culture” and “common society” are two different things, and this is something we should embrace, not run away from. “It should not be necessary to look, walk, feel, think, speak exactly like a paid-up member of the buttoned-up, stiff-upper-lipped, fully corseted and free-born Englishman, culturally to be accorded either the informal courtesy and respect of civil social intercourse or the rights of entitlement and citizenship,” he wrote. “Since cultural diversity is, increasingly, the fate of the modern world, and ethnic absolutism a regressive feature of late-modernity, the greatest danger now arises from forms of national and cultural identity — new or old — which attempt to secure their identity by adopting closed versions of culture or community and by the refusal to engage — in the name of an ‘oppressed white minority’ (sic) — with the difficult problems that arise from trying to live with difference. The capacity to live with difference is, in my view, the coming question of the twenty-first century.” For those of us obsessed with clothes, the question is what an ideal workplace would look like, both in social order and dress culture.
November 23, 2025 at 7:35 PM
Reposted by SPOOKY Ventastica
dieworkwear.bsky.social
But on issues such as respectability and morality, I think you should judge people by their deeper, more important actions. That doesn't mean how they dress, but how they treat others on a more meaningful level.

I will end with something I wrote five years ago about the messy nature of dress codes.
November 23, 2025 at 7:35 PM
Reposted by SPOOKY Ventastica
dieworkwear.bsky.social
Just the other day, I saw someone say they are glad young black men are "wearing quarter zips" and putting away "Jordans," which they say are associated with "ratchet behavior." One should be careful about equating black culture with "ratchet behavior," as they are not one and the same.
A mannequin wearing a quarter zip A photo of Nike's Air Jordans 1
November 23, 2025 at 7:35 PM
Reposted by SPOOKY Ventastica
dieworkwear.bsky.social
There are often debates online about how to dress respectably (and the importance of doing so). These discussions often get uncomfortable because they touch on class and race.
November 23, 2025 at 7:35 PM
Reposted by SPOOKY Ventastica
dieworkwear.bsky.social
On matters of respectable dress, it's helpful to separate two distinct acts. The first is how you decide to dress; the second is how you judge others. It's true that the world judges our appearance.
November 23, 2025 at 7:35 PM
Reposted by SPOOKY Ventastica
dieworkwear.bsky.social
Let's move on with the rest of the passage.

Lewis recognizes that modesty raises thorny issues, but he sweeps them aside to focus on the more important spirit. I want to bring your attention to the last sentence here:
bad manners. When, as often happens, they break it defiantly in order to shock or embarrass others, they are not necessarily being unchaste, but they are being uncharitable: for it is uncharitable to take pleasure in making other people uncomfortable. I do not think that a very strict or fussy standard of propriety is any proof of chastity or any help to it, and I therefore regard the great relaxation and simplifying of the rule which has taken place in my own lifetime as a good thing. At its present stage, however, it has this inconvenience, that people of different ages and different types do not all acknowledge the same standard, and we hardly know where we are. While this confusion lasts I think that old, or old-fashioned, people should be very careful not to assume that young or ‘emancipated’ people are corrupt whenever they are (by the old standard) improper; and, in return, that young people should not call their elders prudes or puritans because they do not easily adopt the new standard. A real desire to believe all the good you can of others and to make others as comfortable as you can will solve most of the problems.
November 23, 2025 at 7:35 PM
Reposted by SPOOKY Ventastica
dieworkwear.bsky.social
Lewis points out something interesting here: modesty has to be understood within the matter of context. A woman in the Pacific Islands, he notes, can be modest while wearing barely any clothes, while a Victorian woman will have different standards for the same idea.
November 23, 2025 at 7:35 PM
Reposted by SPOOKY Ventastica
dieworkwear.bsky.social
Regarding behavior, there's a chapter on sexual morality that begins with one of the least popular Christian virtues: modesty. Here's what CS Lewis had to say:
The text reads: "We must now consider Christian morality as regards sex, what Christians call the virtue of chastity. The Christian rule of chastity must not be confused with the social rule of ‘modesty’ (in one sense of that word); i.e. propriety, or decency. The social rule of propriety lays down how much of the human body should be displayed and what subjects can be referred to, and in what words, according to the customs of a given social circle. Thus, while the rule of chastity is the same for all Christians at all times, the rule of propriety changes. A girl in the Pacific islands wearing hardly any clothes and a Victorian lady completely covered in clothes might both be equally ‘modest’, proper, or decent, according to the standards of their own societies: and both, for all we could tell by their dress, might be equally chaste (or equally unchaste). Some of the language which chaste women used in Shakespeare’s time would have been used in the nineteenth century only by a woman completely abandoned. When people break the rule of propriety current in their own time and place, if they do so in order to excite lust in themselves or others, then they are offending against chastity. But if they break it through ignorance or carelessness they are guilty only of"
November 23, 2025 at 7:35 PM