Opinions are my own, not my employer's.
www.thonking.ai/i/158277004/...
Sadly it does not necessarily align with what makes for a sucessful career in Big Tech. But it's worth trying anyways! :)
www.thonking.ai/i/158277004/...
Sadly it does not necessarily align with what makes for a sucessful career in Big Tech. But it's worth trying anyways! :)
In my experience (mostly geophysical fluid dynamics) JAX has comparable perf to modern Fortran on CPUs, with a much easier path to GPUs and multi-device code.
In my experience (mostly geophysical fluid dynamics) JAX has comparable perf to modern Fortran on CPUs, with a much easier path to GPUs and multi-device code.
For anyone who has tried the new sharding feature -- do you have any guidance on optimal shard sizes, if I want more flexibility in access patterns but still optimal throughput?
For anyone who has tried the new sharding feature -- do you have any guidance on optimal shard sizes, if I want more flexibility in access patterns but still optimal throughput?
- Full support for Zarr v3 spec
- Chunk-sharding for more efficient data storage
- Major performance boosts with async I/O & parallel compression
💻 pip install --upgrade zarr
💻 conda install --channel conda-forge zarr
Blog post: https://buff.ly/3C3OwYw
ECMWF has also done similar work on top of IFS's data assimilation system.
ECMWF has also done similar work on top of IFS's data assimilation system.
@realclimate.org
¡AI Caramba! www.realclimate.org/index.php/ar...
@realclimate.org
¡AI Caramba! www.realclimate.org/index.php/ar...
groups.google.com/g/neuralgcm-...
The biggest one is that NeuralGCM models are now freely available for everyone to use, including for commercial purposes!
groups.google.com/g/neuralgcm-...
The biggest one is that NeuralGCM models are now freely available for everyone to use, including for commercial purposes!
Yes! In the latest NeuralGCM paper, we show that training on satellite-based precipitation results in significant improvements over traditional atmospheric models:
arxiv.org/abs/2412.11973
Yes! In the latest NeuralGCM paper, we show that training on satellite-based precipitation results in significant improvements over traditional atmospheric models:
arxiv.org/abs/2412.11973
I'll be giving an overview talk on NeuralGCM at 11:30am Wed at the Google booth, and an talk on modeling precipitation with NeuralGCM at 4:25pm Wed in the session A34A.
I'll be giving an overview talk on NeuralGCM at 11:30am Wed at the Google booth, and an talk on modeling precipitation with NeuralGCM at 4:25pm Wed in the session A34A.
AI is way better in this respect. It's easy to use lots of FLOPs on big matmuls!
AI is way better in this respect. It's easy to use lots of FLOPs on big matmuls!