Stan Carey
@stancarey.bsky.social
4.5K followers 250 following 1.6K posts
Editor, writer, lapsed biologist in the west of Ireland Copy-editing, writing: https://stancarey.com Language: https://stancarey.wordpress.com Strong language: https://stronglang.wordpress.com 🎞 https://letterboxd.com/stancarey 🦣 @[email protected]
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
stancarey.bsky.social
I should introduce myself, now that the world is ending. I'm a freelance copy-editor/proofreader from Ireland. And I write, mostly about language: stancarey.com
stancarey.wordpress.com

I hike a bit and always have a book on the go and a film in mind. Background in biology; environmentalist at heart
Stan Carey editing and proofreading | Tidy, tighten, or transform your text
stancarey.com
stancarey.bsky.social
It's probably not well known outside of linguistics circles – much of it went over my head a lot of the time. But I loved its humour when I understood it (I used to link to it from my blog sometimes) and am sorry to see it end.
stancarey.bsky.social
Yeah, it's been such a fixture. Huge credit to them for sustaining it this long
Reposted by Stan Carey
sesquiotic.bsky.social
Yeah, I got several gigs writing articles on language, and I started @stronglang.bsky.social with @stancarey.bsky.social , and I met a whole bunch of people who are friends now.
conradhackett.bsky.social
Has anything great happened in your life because of social media?
stancarey.bsky.social
"The marginalisation of local and Indigenous knowledge has long been driven by entrenched power structures. GenAI puts this process on steroids."

More good reasons to resist and refuse this technology
aeon.co
The training data for generative AI is far from the sum total of human knowledge. As well as oral cultures, many languages are absent, creating significant blindspots in AI’s understanding of human experience
Generative AI has access to a small slice of human knowledge | Aeon Essays
Huge swathes of human knowledge are missing from the internet. By definition, generative AI is shockingly ignorant too
buff.ly
Reposted by Stan Carey
jessdkant.bsky.social
To be candid, I want the bubble to burst. Because it will eventually and inevitably, but the longer the current charade goes on the more our planet and communities are decimated— and the more dependent we become on the few powerful people left who control those resources.
jessdkant.bsky.social
Energy requirements for AI mean that the only way for the bubble not to burst would require companies to multiply their carbon footprint to an unimaginable degree. Right now, while AI is barely functional and mostly a novelty for the lazy, it requires so much energy that data centers rival cities.
Reposted by Stan Carey
jessdkant.bsky.social
So when I hear of students being encouraged to use GPT in college I don’t hear innovation. I hear cognitive atrophy, the inability to think critically for oneself, and total dependence on vulnerable centralized repositories of data for knowledge without ever understanding how knowledge is generated.
stancarey.bsky.social
2013 feels like an entire lifetime ago in internet years
stancarey.bsky.social
Yes: "would've" is a contraction of "would have". I address this in paragraph 1.
Reposted by Stan Carey
stancarey.bsky.social
spidermanicule is the best blend I've seen in aeons
stancarey.bsky.social
Some authors who have used "would of", etc:

Hilary Mantel, Margaret Atwood, Raymond Carver, Patrick O'Brian, Sylvia Plath, Shirley Jackson, Octavia Butler, Raymond Chandler, Dashiell Hammett, James Baldwin, Anne Tyler, Elmore Leonard, Carson McCullers, Terry Pratchett, Dylan Thomas, Agatha Christie
stancarey.bsky.social
Basically yes, though NB I'm not a linguist either. "Thing is" seems to have become a kind of fused unit, the "is" having been bleached of its former copular function. But I wouldn't call "thing is" a word just yet!
stancarey.bsky.social
I'd say that falls under lexicalization. But something different from "would of" (or "would've of") is going on, syntactically, with "is is", a construction that has attracted a lot of attention from linguists ygdp.yale.edu/phenomena/do...
Double is | Yale Grammatical Diversity Project: English in North America
ygdp.yale.edu
Reposted by Stan Carey
bcdreyer.social
And whatever would of walked there, would of walked alone.
stancarey.bsky.social
Don't mind me, I'm just here fantasizing about a publicly available exchange between the two of you on the subject of English usage
stancarey.bsky.social
"would of" (and "shouldn't of" and "ought to of") get the green light from Shirley Jackson AND Benjamin Dreyer
bcdreyer.social
I’m happy to take credit for encountering the Let Me Tell You examples in copyediting and merrily thinking If that’s what Shirley wants, then we’re good to go.
Reposted by Stan Carey
ellenforget.bsky.social
Can anyone recommend an academic audiobook that was well done? Looking for a good example of how to handle citations, footnotes, bibliography, etc. in audiobook format. Ideally an academic monograph. Please only recommend if you've read the audiobook and thought it was well done.
stancarey.bsky.social
Not something I can help with, I'm afraid, but I've passed it on to someone who might
stancarey.bsky.social
Oh yes! I read that marvellous collection before I knew you copy-edited it. Glad to get this insider report.