Shadab Choudhury
@namer.bsky.social
380 followers 440 following 250 posts
(He/Him). Previously at LARA Lab @UMBC, Mohsin Lab @BRACU | Accessibility, Explainability and Multimodal DL. My opinions are mine. I'm on the PhD application cycle for Fall '26! www.shadabchy.com
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
And, glancing at the list of tasks, most of the ones GPT-5 missed, even if not good *enough* today, are just... pretty much solveable via engineering?
The funniest thing about this is Gary Marcus put his name on it even though we all know if an LLM-based approach, already at 60%, ever manages to reach 100% he'll still refuse to accept its AGI-hood.
Yes, yes, you're all very much welcome for the em dashes.
you should live vicariously through playing Subway Builder instead
Folks on ML socials these past few weeks.
My dad's been watching instructional car videos and every other video he opens is utter slop.

I'm in the room and it's SO obvious to me that a video with generated images/panning stock photos and a steady, droning narration in numbered list format is slop. Even he can tell

But for how much longer?
This is also the cause of the "BlueSky is boring" complaining.

BlueSky gave them the power to have more control over their content and they looked at that power and had absolutely no clue what to do with it and threw up their arms whining.
Recommender systems have quite literally broken younger folks' ability to search. I'm not kidding you, the average user is utterly incapable of finding content without a recommender feeding them things. That's why forums died but reddit survived as a social platform, because forums don't use recsys.
It’s frustrating LLMs are the epicenter of this because if you’re looking for a piece of tech to hate, social media recommender algorithms were *right there* and have done far, far more to break society

Tearing those down to the studs and rebuilding wouldn’t suck
antivax movement but it’s left coded and targets machine learning, artificial intelligence, and engineering fields
Not can, but do!

Some of your best candidates are going to be people who know exactly how flawed the use of LLMs here are, and will see the use of LLMs here as a massive red flag for the whole company.
the tail of the y looks like it was beaten and violently contorted into that shape, damn
Nobody seems to have mentioned the blog post yet that dropped yesterday that 'debunks' K2-Think. Turns out, it's guilty of the classic sins of train-on-test and sketchy-comparisons.

www.sri.inf.ethz.ch/blog/k2think
Still boggles the mind how one of the dullest and most uninspiring pieces of Harry Potter fanfiction led to where we are today.
tpot/rationalism/effective altruism family tree in case anyone is confused
absolutely incredible

credits: u/showermusicc on reddit
And ultimately, I'd rather be here than in a place where I have to fight for space with people who believe vaccines cause autism and windmills kill whales and horse injections cure all and if I want to actually be heard I have to pay someone who then uses my money to fund and support those beliefs
Most of our work is engineering and everyone knows that.
Thinking that any more than 10% of machine learning and AI research counts as 'science' is the real cope here.
the entire field of machine learning and AI research is basically verboten here due to the maniac behavior of large swathes of the left, this article feels like cope
NEW: Bluesky is becoming place to discuss scientific research - it gets more proper engagement & attention, new study finds.

For all the talk of decline - borne out by several metrics - the science community seems to have adopted Bluesky more than others.

Story: www.theguardian.com/technology/2...
rip openreview

Apparently 60k+ reviews was too much to handle. Hope no one's getting desk rejected at AAAI over non-submission of revieiws.
In my honest opinion, immature but good ideas belong in Workshops, Symposiums, Doctoral Consortiums, etc., not conferences

But induced demand is right. If you're competing for positions and see other applicants have 6 CVPR papers, you also (think you) need 6-8 CVPR/ECCV/ICCV papers to get an offer.
Though, frankly speaking, they really should've just gotten a much bigger venue at Mexico City. 500 attendees there is nothing given just how many people can't or won't travel to the US at the moment.
NeurIPS already has two official locations and one endorsed satellite location!

If they allowed for papers to be presented at EurIPS without being also presented at either San Diego or Mexico City, they could easily accommodate those 400 papers.
ACCV and WACV have deadlines around July and September respectively (though ACCV still has the problem of being biannual). For more specialized work, FG (faces) and 3DV (3D) also have deadlines in that same timeframe.
As far as I've found, Lumo is just a wrapper around a few external LLMs (they mention Nemo, OpenHands 32B, OLMO 2 32B, and Mistral Small 3).

Seems like Marketing fucked up and was unaware of the terminology used for AI Policy or Engineering. Still not a great look.
wait, I know econ PhD programs are batshit these days but this sounds so oddly specific-

what'd they do?
And on that note, many questions, esp in the History section, seem to be about info that simply may not exist. I.e. there is no way to get a correct answer even with human validation (unless you threw a History department a million dollar grant, I guess). How would the answers to these be confirmed?