Mike Buda
banner
mikebuda.bsky.social
Mike Buda
@mikebuda.bsky.social
320 followers 540 following 22 posts
A transit and municipal guy. Lots of climbing and skiing in BC. Executive Director at the TransLink Mayors' Council in Metro Vancouver.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Mike Buda
“Metro Vancouver can't solve cost-of-living crisis without addressing the cost of getting around.” | Important new report on the cost of housing + transportation in Metro Vancouver. (Hint: the cost of transportation is big driver in unaffordability). vancouversun.com/news/metro-v...
'It's practical common sense': Metro Vancouver can't solve cost-of-living crisis without addressing the cost of getting around
For several suburban areas, people spend more on commuting than on housing
vancouversun.com
Transit agencies do this a lot and the responses are pretty clear: a free bus that doesn't show up isn't useful. Of course, a fast, frequent, reliable AND free bus is better than one that isn't free, but lower income transit users mostly say that good bus service needs to come first.
Reposted by Mike Buda
What transit experts generally tell you is: the highest use of scarce resources is making transit service more *frequent & reliable*. That's what actually boosts ridership.

Everything else -- free point-of-use fare, electric buses, fancy new trolleys, architecturally fancy stations -- matters less.
Reposted by Mike Buda
very clear explanation from @davidzipper.bsky.social about why fast buses are better than free buses slate.com/business/202...
Reposted by Mike Buda
Since we are discussing free transit again, let me tell you why I'm sympathetic in theory but skeptical in practice.

It's not only about the trade-offs between service increase and fare money or the questionable decision of targeting only buses.

It's more broadly about redistributive policies.
Reposted by Mike Buda
To conclude, the reason I'm not a supporter of generalized free transit is because I think that other redistributive policies on housing and education are more important.

Especially in a country like the US, with no universal healthcare and a ludicrously expensive higher education system.
As you know, elevated metros aren't a huge issue in most of Metro Vancouver: it is the default (thank god). But there are still critics, so new defenses are always needed. Your point #2 is not one I have seen used here, and it is brilliant! (and similar to the rationale for bus lanes)
Reposted by Mike Buda
Mayors’ Council Chair Brad West & @metrovancouverorg.bsky.social Chair Mike Hurley were in Ottawa talking to new Housing and Infrastructure Minister @gregorrobertson.bsky.social (a former MC Chair!) about the importance of local housing-supportive infrastructure like transit, water and waste water.
Reposted by Mike Buda
Transit advocates need to grow our power to the point where we can create big problems for elected officials if they *don’t* save transit.
The one and only weird trick to save transit is having elected officials who actually decide it is important to save transit.
Reposted by Mike Buda
"Some residents are pushing back on a plan to create transit priority lanes on a few of the city’s busiest surface routes ... a version of NIMBY (not-in-my-backyard) that might be dubbed NIMPS: not in my parking spot."
www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/edit...
Globe editorial: How to end the free ride of street parkers
Car owners should pay full freight for their use of city streets, or cede the space to public transit
www.theglobeandmail.com
Speaking just to the comments on "why not amalgamate?!" I would suggest perusing the extensive academic research on this subject - led by UVic's Bob Bish (i.e. "Local Government Amalgamations: Discredited Nineteenth-century Ideals Alive in the Twenty-first"). No need to reinvent the wheel.
Reposted by Mike Buda
Trump is holding hostage the emergency disaster relief and transit funding of states that don’t agree with his immigration demands, according to two lawsuits filed by several states this week.
Trump Sued for Holding States’ Disaster Relief Hostage
Donald Trump is increasing pressure on states that refuse to join his war on immigration.
newrepublic.com
Great thread. So many gotchas out there right, but housing policy is complex and ever changing which you underline well here.
Reposted by Mike Buda
As we're finally witnessing in 2025, regional governments at the state level in the US or the Provincial level in Canada are taking region-wide action on housing supply because micro-regional changes do not significantly impact housing markets.
Reposted by Mike Buda
Who was most responsible for Vancouver's housing rents + prices by 2018?

(a) Fed Minister Diane Finley
(b) Fed Minister Jason Kenney
(c) Prov Minister Rich Coleman
(d) Mayor Gregor Robertson

(Reminder: Vancouver represented only 25% of the population of the Metro Vancouver region in 2018.)
Reposted by Mike Buda
Congratulations to former Mayors’ Council Chair,
Gregor Robertson, on your appointment as Minister of Housing and Infrastructure and Minister responsible for Pacific Economic Development Canada. A huge accomplishment.

As you can imagine, we have some ideas for your new gig!
Reposted by Mike Buda
NYC’s congestion pricing is a policy miracle: Less traffic, less noise, faster transit, more business sales, more transit revenue. And it hasn’t produced the negative effects outside the cordon zone we were afraid of.

www.nytimes.com/interactive/...
Reposted by Mike Buda
Reposted by Mike Buda
More frequent buses means more ridership.

"there is no such thing as tailoring service to demand — demand is not fixed. The phenomenon of induced demand is as real for transit as it is for highways: If you provide a more attractive service, more people will use it.
#transit #urbanism
"We don’t have to wait until all our suburbs are rebuilt to become European-style walkable utopias; it’s possible to get people out of their cars in a matter of months simply by running buses more frequently."

www.bloomberg.com/news/article...
How Did This Suburb Figure Out Mass Transit?
Transit ridership is off the charts in Brampton, Ontario, despite its typical low-density suburban layout. Here’s how the city got residents to get on the bus.
www.bloomberg.com
Reposted by Mike Buda
*We still have work to do*. The Access for Everyone Plan is NOT fully funded & this IP only puts off our structural deficit for 2 more years. We need a new funding model, and a new funding tool, & that will be the centre of the work of the Mayors Council in the year ahead. 4/4 accessforeveryone.ca
Access for Everyone
The new plan for expanding public transit across B.C.'s Lower Mainland and improving infrastructure for drivers, cyclists and pedestrians.
accessforeveryone.ca
Reposted by Mike Buda
I am excited that the @translink.ca Board and @mayorscouncil.bsky.social both unanimously ratified a new Investment plan today. It's not the perfect plan, and every compromise in it reflects the challenges of the negotiations that occurred between the Mayors & the Provincial Government... 1/n
Reposted by Mike Buda
Mayors’ Council chair Brad West says that “noted left-wing premier Doug Ford” funds infrastructure for Toronto transit at twice the per capita rate as the B.C. government does for TransLink.

the line gets laughs but the canada proud comment section might agree