Mike
@lpoolmike.bsky.social
1.2K followers 1.1K following 10K posts
📍 Liverpool, UK X refugee in the UK 🏳️‍🌈 Passionate about politics,science, history, amphibians, horticulture, carnivorous plants, film (esp. horror) and LFC.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
Just a quick message to all the lady sexbots and OF performers that keep trying to follow me or are sending me DMs. Don’t waste your time loves #ontheotherbus
Defensively all over the shop still #LFC
That is a penalty. Of course Paul Tierney disagrees #LFC
Everything is going to be ok I’m sure #LFC
Someone who had learned their lesson wouldn’t be doing a tour of the studios less than a day after he got a literal get out of jail free card
Reposted by Mike
Absolutely. The only consistent is their inconsistency.
I sometimes wonder what they have actually seen in their heads
I don’t think I’ve watched a game where I thought Simon Hooper was in control. Inconsistent, totally reactive and frequently wrong. Must be so difficult as a player dealing with these refs when you have no idea what they are going to do or think they have seen
a man is kneeling in front of a car with the words the problem is they 're just not very good
Alt: a man is kneeling in front of a car with the words the problem is they 're just not very good
media.tenor.com
Maybe, I’m not convinced.
I don’t know - the follow through onto the ankle seemed more than a coming together to me
It’s like when players are fouled after they have made an attempt isn’t it. Never given but I’m not sure why not
I know the ball had gone but surely that’s a foul on Digne and therefore a penalty?
You can be fouled off the ball in the penalty area and be awarded a penalty and so why is that different?
I don’t miss the other place (as it is now) but it had some wonderful moments
Happy third anniversary to one of Twitter’s last great moments
Ah ok. Didn’t see that change.
I think a lot of refs blow up immediately before it’s obvious if possession is going to change but that is my understanding of the actual law. I wouldn’t trust Hooper to ref a tiddlywinks match so would be typical of him to mess it up if I’ve misremembered the rule change
As far as I know the law only results in a stoppage and drop ball if possession of the ball changes because of the referee
I only thought it applied if Villa gained possession of the ball because it hit the referee
Only if the team with the ball loses possession