Should we see the OLC memo stating that personnel taking part in drug boat strikes won’t be exposed to future prosecution?
Or communications about the War Powers Resolution?
OLC says no, not any time soon.
Should we see the OLC memo stating that personnel taking part in drug boat strikes won’t be exposed to future prosecution?
Or communications about the War Powers Resolution?
OLC says no, not any time soon.
And while it violates all of our civil liberties, its FOIA program is a joke - making accountability even more difficult.
From here on out, every member of Congress with jurisdiction over DHS should be demanding answers about the state of its FOIA office.
And while it violates all of our civil liberties, its FOIA program is a joke - making accountability even more difficult.
From here on out, every member of Congress with jurisdiction over DHS should be demanding answers about the state of its FOIA office.
Not that I'm going to hold DHS's feet to the fire (I am), but in FY 2024 their average processing time for simple requests when information was released is...11 days.
Let's see if that sticks.
Not that I'm going to hold DHS's feet to the fire (I am), but in FY 2024 their average processing time for simple requests when information was released is...11 days.
Let's see if that sticks.
This holiday season, help us protect press freedom: freedom.press/donate
This holiday season, help us protect press freedom: freedom.press/donate
Part of the problem is that there's no clear definition of what damage to national security actually means, so it's proving to be an easy way for the administration to manipulate the market.
Part of the problem is that there's no clear definition of what damage to national security actually means, so it's proving to be an easy way for the administration to manipulate the market.
www.crisesnotes.com/the-federal-...
www.crisesnotes.com/the-federal-...
Urge Congress to reform the law using our easy action center tool:
Urge Congress to reform the law using our easy action center tool:
To grease some palms, just make a sizable contribution to a congressional portrait. Nobody will ever know.
Fascinating story highlighting a transparency blindspot from @notus.com @davelevinthal.com.
(The puns write themselves: Portrayal betrayal. A study in secrecy)
To grease some palms, just make a sizable contribution to a congressional portrait. Nobody will ever know.
Fascinating story highlighting a transparency blindspot from @notus.com @davelevinthal.com.
(The puns write themselves: Portrayal betrayal. A study in secrecy)
https://www.notus.org/money/congressional-portait-funds
Reporting on public ICE activity is protected by the First Amendment. It’s also something journalists do routinely.
Senator Wyden is right to call out this attack on the First Amendment.
Reporting on public ICE activity is protected by the First Amendment. It’s also something journalists do routinely.
Senator Wyden is right to call out this attack on the First Amendment.
There is no administrator of DOGE?
There is no administrator of DOGE?
There is no administrator of DOGE?
There is no administrator of DOGE?
There is no administrator of DOGE?
There is no administrator of DOGE?
THERE IS NO ADMINISTRATOR OF DOGE??????
#WITAOD
What happened to its records, and what became of the agency databases it stole/copied, including Social Security's?
Does OPM have them? Were they destroyed?
Only DOGE’s own files can tell us. And right now, we don’t have them.
What happened to its records, and what became of the agency databases it stole/copied, including Social Security's?
Does OPM have them? Were they destroyed?
Only DOGE’s own files can tell us. And right now, we don’t have them.
What happened to its records, and what became of the agency databases it stole/copied, including Social Security's?
Does OPM have them? Were they destroyed?
Only DOGE’s own files can tell us. And right now, we don’t have them.
We’ll need them to understand what it did with the datasets it copied from agencies, how it mishandled our data, and how to prevent another DOGE.
So - who’s ensuring the records aren’t being destroyed?
We’ll need them to understand what it did with the datasets it copied from agencies, how it mishandled our data, and how to prevent another DOGE.
So - who’s ensuring the records aren’t being destroyed?
Instead of sending somebody an email that contains actual information about their request, it sends them a link with a time-sensitive token that expires after 48 hours and that can't be renewed more than twice.
As often as not, the tokens take you to a broken link.
Instead of sending somebody an email that contains actual information about their request, it sends them a link with a time-sensitive token that expires after 48 hours and that can't be renewed more than twice.
As often as not, the tokens take you to a broken link.