Johannes Enevoldsen
banner
johsenevoldsen.bsky.social
Johannes Enevoldsen
@johsenevoldsen.bsky.social
1.1K followers 290 following 100 posts
MD, PhD. Currently in Nephrology. Interested in health, statistics and scientific programming (R and Julia)
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
The central venous pressure (CVP) waveform is the interaction between a fast cyclic effect of the heart and a slower cyclic effect of ventilation.

A steady CVP waveform can be visualized as a 3D plane.

🩺

(Old Twitter post)
"If CO increases, EtCO2 rises, CO2 elimination increases, PaCO2 falls and this is also sustained."

The problem here is that if CO2 elimination increases, without a matching increase in production, dissolved CO2 will drop with a constant rate (elimination - production)
In ROSC, there is definitely an increase in CO2 production to maintain the new EtCO2.

I dont see how an increase in EtCO2 is not directly proportional to the amount of exhaled CO2 (unless the patient suddenly gets obstructive).
So when people use/study EtCO2 as indicator of fluid responsiveness, they look for a *temporary* increase in EtCO2? This is the model that makes sense to me, but I could not find it specified in any of the papers.
CaCO2 refers to the average CO2 in blood (arterial + venosus), right? The arterial concentration increase with ⬆️CO.

VCO2 = Exhaled + ΔCavCO2

At steady state the dissolved part is constant, so VCO2 = exhaled CO2.
I see how better V/Q will get EtCO2 closer to PaCO2.

But how can we sustain a higher EtCO2, if production is constant?
Assuming a square capnography curve, EtCO2 must be directly proportional to the volume of exhaled CO2, which must equal the production of CO2 (at steady state).
I don't understand the relationship between CO and ETCO2.

ETCO2 increases with rising CO, if ventilation and CO2 production is constant.

Is this just temporary?
We can't exhale more CO2 than we produce.

#anSky #medSky
@doctorhelgi.bsky.social
@load-dependent.bsky.social
@jm-l.bsky.social
Reposted by Johannes Enevoldsen
There's a puzzle I've found annoying so I thought I'd let you find it annoying too: kucharski.substack.com/p/why-the-tu...
I find it more acceptable if it's formulated as: You ask a person with two kids: "is at least one of your kids a boy born on a Tuesday?" They say "yes". What is the probability that they have two boys?
Ah 👌 det giver jo egentligt god mening. TIL
Ok. Mit eksempel var grammatisk forkert ☺️ " ... med dens krig"

Men er den oprindelige overskrift ikke stadig god nok?
Er det ikke korrekt? "dansker banker" er grundled i sætningen.

Sætningen kunne forsættes "... med deres krig"
Reposted by Johannes Enevoldsen
Small blog post on how to automate model building for mechanical systems using ModelingToolkit. #julialang

michielstock.github.io/posts/2025/p...
Reposted by Johannes Enevoldsen
Thanks for the reminder @janemunday.bsky.social. Every summer, I repost this article DROWNING DOES NOT LOOK LIKE DROWNING. To date, I know of FOUR kids who were saved after someone who'd clicked on the link learnt how to spot actual drowning. Take time to read and pass on.

slate.com/technology/2...
Drowning Doesn’t Look Like Drowning
Drowning is not the violent, splashing call for help that most people expect.
slate.com
Great ... though it would have been nice to make this show 0✅
I have the same problem. If I only ever intend putting it on GitHub, is it reasonable to just ignore it? Escaping all these characters will make the code a lot less readable.
It would be a reasonable regulatory mechanism, that lactate signals increased oxygen demand and raises CO, though I don't know whether it is possible, or even meaningful, to distinguish whether lactate is both fuel and a signal, or just fuel.
My cardiac arrhythmia simulation now also simulates how a reentrant loop can be terminated by increasing refractory time as suggested by @empoisonpharmd.bsky.social

Direct link to the updated part:
jenevoldsen.com/posts/excita...
Reposted by Johannes Enevoldsen
Absolutely fascinating! We know the heart switches to lactate as energy substrate in shock, could there be a clinical benefit from lactate infusion in human cardiogenic shock? #emimcc #cccsky
Lactate infusion enhances cardiac output and peripheral perfusion in ischemic cardiogenic shock without affecting heart rate or systemic blood pressure, finds a study published in Critical Care.

#MedSky
Lactate infusion improves cardiac function in a porcine model of ischemic cardiogenic shock
Critical Care
bit.ly
Incredible effect sizes. Do we know what lactate does in a healthy heart? From a teleological perspective, it would make sense that lactate has a positive inotropic effect, regardless of it being a substrate. Simply as a signal of hypoperfusion.
I'm sorry you had to experience that. Unfortunately I don't know what determines which treatment is tried first, or whether e.g. cardioversion can be expected to work if the condition reoccurs, when it didn't work the first time.
My cardiac arrhythmia simulation now also simulates how a reentrant loop can be terminated by increasing refractory time as suggested by @empoisonpharmd.bsky.social

Direct link to the updated part:
jenevoldsen.com/posts/excita...
Reposted by Johannes Enevoldsen
✨ It's new samwho visual essay o'clock! ✨

Reservoir sampling is one of my favourite algorithms. It allows you to sample from a set without knowing the size of that set.

I try to assume no prior knowledge, and use no scary math notation. Just beautiful visuals.

Let me know what you think! ❤️
Reposted by Johannes Enevoldsen
I just want to say I use this constantly at the bedside when dealing with patients who have arrythmias to explain how they propagate.

would LOVE LOVE a model where increasing refractory terminates reentrant rhythm so I can show how diltiazem terminates SVT.

such an amazing tool, thank you
I wrote a short interactive article👆

It uses simulations to demonstrate how different cardiac arrhythmias can develop.

Try it out! (It has defibrillators ⚡️)

jenevoldsen.com/posts/excitable-cells

#medsky #cardiosky #cccsky #emimcc