Justin (J. M. L.) Whittington
@jmlwhittington.com
110 followers 120 following 120 posts
PhD student, Texts and Technology, University of Central Florida Scholar (and lover) of games and theme parks, yapper of politics https://jmlwhittington.com/ | #AppalachianGameStudies Unwise views are my own; wiser ones are communal
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
I've been obsessed with Wingspan for over two weeks now, which I lovingly refer to as "bird game." It's just so much fun for no reason at all.
Reposted by Justin (J. M. L.) Whittington
Pibb calls itself a “spicy cherry soda.” Dr. Pepper rejects any suggestion of cherryness; it is a “pepper soda,” of which it is the canonical and hypothetically sole example. Cola is spiced, as a flavor, mostly by cinnamon. That is all for now.

Oh, Pibb Zero is possible.
Reposted by Justin (J. M. L.) Whittington
This kind of behavior is always kind of annoying but especially bugs me in this case because this is an 87 page NTSB report including both culture issues and detailed photos and microscopic analysis of the hull failure which I was really itching for and all previous reports were light on
Can't not read this as "I've been byte-en."
bug-byte, software house, t-shirts (1984) archive.org/details/your...
Folks are *still* trying to do this too. I'm someone who notices these things as well but gets over it. Aside from its figurative form here, I can attest to the *literal* myopia this level of screen usage causes. Less is more.
After Just 10 Minutes With Breath Of The Wild's Switch 2 Port, I Know I Can Never Go Back To The Original
Breath of the Wild’s Switch 2 port doesn’t change too much, but a fresh coat of paint on an all-timer has me excited to sink another 100 hours.
www.thegamer.com
Almost (read: 125%) certain that when I ask Kayelin how the game is going later, she'll respond with, "So much fun! Look at my cute Pokémon! We're winning so many battles!"

There was similar discourse around TLoZ: Breath of the Wild when it released...now considered one of the greatest games ever.
Review challenge: cover a game without treating graphics/performance as 80% of the content.
Reposted by Justin (J. M. L.) Whittington
Learned that an anonymous outside expert on submersibles did an interview with the OceanGate Titan investigation, and they released a transcript, with all the names redacted. The first line of his first answer? "I'm sure you're familiar with my film Titanic."
There was an underpass in my hometown that had "Infowars.com" spray-painted on it when I was younger.

maps.app.goo.gl/A8rMKwsn1L39...

It sat there for years and I remember visiting it out of curiosity. Immediately saw it as nonsense.

I need this resolution to the story arc.
Regarding the news today, all I have to say for now is... subscribe to The Onion. Thank you for believing in us and thank you for your patience.
Join The Onion
Don’t just read the news. Feel it. Be among the first to feel the news.
membership.theonion.com
This game disappointed me so hardcore on launch. I gave it another chance recently and it wasn't *too* bad, but I'm still left wanting for the New Vegas spiritual successor I was promised.

Also, what happened to telegraphing possible story decisions in RPGs? Or not harshly punishing early ones?
Reposted by Justin (J. M. L.) Whittington
Reposted by Justin (J. M. L.) Whittington
It's honestly so liberating the first time you go to a theater by yourself because you realize you can just, like, go see any movie whenever you want and then you realize how many times you've deprived yourself from experiencing stuff you like due to a stigma.
i don't want to be a gatekeeper, so i'm not going to say that people who agree with this tweet don't actually like movies. not gonna say it.
Reposted by Justin (J. M. L.) Whittington
Du Bois basically did a version of this in his bibliography in Black Reconstruction
An in-depth technical explanation of what's going on here and why it scares me so terribly: www.safebreach.com/blog/invitat...
A friend sent me a Reddit post today about the new Gemini 2.5 Computer Use model, and my brain went immediately to prompt injection attacks.

It's wild that the real-world implementation of this tech is too quickly becoming this guy:
Yes Man
Yes Man is an AI program that serves as Benny's assistant and right-hand man in 2281. He is a modified PDQ-88b Securitron with a unique personality, serving as an integral part of Benny's scheme to ta...
fallout.fandom.com
The joke can probably be seen as a case of the truth fading "quickly" in terms of historical era; once Sumer fell, the context was lost and the joke's meaning too because it was too largely bound up in that moment.

Yet, as mentioned, new interpretations are still possible.
It was. Propaganda is a great example in which the overt ties to that context cause its interest to fade quickly as the context fades. But I was also thinking of some folks' newfound appreciation of Soviet-era propaganda, per a rise in socialist identification. It's a two-sided coin.
Nathalie's claim, if I'm understanding correctly, aligns with this still. New meanings are being read through the detachment of now and then, even if some of the original is lost in the process. Benjamin is doing dialectical work and so that tension is natural.
Most cases are somewhere in-between this and right now, and require varying degrees of careful historical and interpretative work as a result to uncover truth content. Weirdly, the Sumerian joke can still provide *some* meaning: that understandings can be lost, for instance.
I know this is an ancient reply, but I come back to the main post every so often and just so happened to look down this time.

The quoted post is an example of what happens when enough time passes to fully obscure the relationship between the subject matter and the truth content.
That, or good faith engagement? I don't see what we stand to lose.
It goes beyond misuse and into questions of, in my example, racism, but more broadly (and as Marinucci points out in the text in the other response) personhood/humanity in general.

So, a variation of the golden rule: "If all I have to say is 'you're a bot,' perhaps no response is also sufficient."
Early on in the "how do we detect AI?" furor, people were using "delve" as a shibboleth. AI detectors were born of the same impulse. I deliberately link "calling folks bots," because the paranoia and rush to prove human authorship resulted in non-English users being called "non-human."
Having attended the author's presentation on the book at a conference recently, and that the intro states it as well: the impetus for the book was the loneliness that drove her own chatbot interaction.