Ivan Boldyrev
@ivanboldyrev.bsky.social
520 followers 470 following 240 posts
philosopher, historian of ideas, asst prof at Radboud University, co-editor, Hegel Bulletin @universitypress.cambridge.org history and philosophy of (recent) economics performativity Hegel and German intellectual history https://ivanboldyrev.net/
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Ivan Boldyrev
undercoverhist.bsky.social
What does a Nobel Prize on ‘innovation-driven economic growth’ actually reward?

A historian’s perspective on how to deal with the Nobel frenzy

beatricecherrier.wordpress.com/2025/10/13/w...
ivanboldyrev.bsky.social
a lot of interesting stuff for historians to explore here
afinetheorem.bsky.social
What a great day: legends of innovation economics Mokyr, Aghion and Howitt win the Nobel. Joel was a PhD advisor of mine, so need a full article! Included: good & bad explanations of the Indus Rev, Aghion's charisma, influence of Jon Hughes, French fashion houses: kevinbryanecon.com/mokyraghionh...
A Nobel for Innovation: Mokyr, Aghion, and Howitt
kevinbryanecon.com
Reposted by Ivan Boldyrev
nyecominetti.bsky.social
Main thing I took from Best of econtwitter today is that the whole of US economics still seems to be on twitter. Which is a shame
ivanboldyrev.bsky.social
Roger Backhouse had a paper on that
Reposted by Ivan Boldyrev
mariabach.bsky.social
You can now follow the podcast on Bluesky: @ceterisnparibus.bsky.social
ivanboldyrev.bsky.social
… and one Nobelist more in this book now
ivanboldyrev.bsky.social
Freely available, classic and new papers on institutionalism, by Nobel prize winners, but also many bright minds working right now, including my Radboud colleague Robbert Maseland!
link.springer.com/referencewor...
Handbook of New Institutional Economics
This Open Access Handbook provides a timely overview of recent developments and broad orientations in new institutional economics.
link.springer.com
ivanboldyrev.bsky.social
For Peirce, that was not a problem
Reposted by Ivan Boldyrev
nbrisset.bsky.social
Hyped to read the special issue that goes with this introduction by @vhalsmayer.bsky.social and Eric Hounshell.

www.cambridge.org/core/journal...
ivanboldyrev.bsky.social
Freely available, classic and new papers on institutionalism, by Nobel prize winners, but also many bright minds working right now, including my Radboud colleague Robbert Maseland!
link.springer.com/referencewor...
Handbook of New Institutional Economics
This Open Access Handbook provides a timely overview of recent developments and broad orientations in new institutional economics.
link.springer.com
ivanboldyrev.bsky.social
This
economicthought.bsky.social
Article: Economics in the Mirror of Anthropology: Knight, Boulding, Posner, and Akerlof in Perspective, by Véronique Dutraive
doi.org/10.1215/0018...
ivanboldyrev.bsky.social
I could tell stories of navigating/publishing in economics, history, philosophy of science, and German literature journals, but I guess the audience would be confused
ivanboldyrev.bsky.social
Yes, it makes the 'performance' culture of 'look how cool I am' indistinguishable from meaningful exchange of ideas
Reposted by Ivan Boldyrev
philipncohen.com
"Among articles stating that data was available upon request, only 17% shared data upon request." (Or: you keep saying these words. I do not think they mean what you think they mean)
ianhussey.mmmdata.io
My article "Data is not available upon request" was published in Meta-Psychology. Very happy to see this out!
open.lnu.se/index.php/me...
LnuOpen | Meta-Psychology
open.lnu.se
ivanboldyrev.bsky.social
(I vote for Bowles, but he is unlikely to win)
The wisdom of the Nobel committee would be to combine the winners approaching the same topic from different perspectives
undercoverhist.bsky.social
1/2 I wish I could stay away from incoming econ Nobel frenzy, but you don't always get what you want, so help me

Here is @richardtol.bsky.social's forecast (richardtol.substack.com/p/2025-nobel...) Samuelson's 1969 reflection on how many laureates should receive it jointly, and questions for you:
ivanboldyrev.bsky.social
Jensen passed away last year, Shleifer and Fehr are highly unlikely contenders (unless sth very unusual happens), I vote for Bowles, one of the real thinkers in the discipline