Elaine Fultz ๐๐โฎ๏ธ
@fultzmoyerlibrary.bsky.social
200 followers
88 following
270 posts
Youth advocate & librarian
Fierce ally for LGBTQIA+ youth
Kids' literature zealot
Banned books reader
Veteran educator
Fairy enthusiast
Religion: Halloween ๐
WOKE warrior
Bring it
Posts
Media
Videos
Starter Packs
Pinned
Reposted by Elaine Fultz ๐๐โฎ๏ธ
Reposted by Elaine Fultz ๐๐โฎ๏ธ
Reposted by Elaine Fultz ๐๐โฎ๏ธ
Reposted by Elaine Fultz ๐๐โฎ๏ธ
I feel like When Women Were Dragons is the successor of The Girl Who Drank the Moon. The movement of rage and the refusal to be targeted any longer.
Reposted by Elaine Fultz ๐๐โฎ๏ธ
Reposted by Elaine Fultz ๐๐โฎ๏ธ
Reposted by Elaine Fultz ๐๐โฎ๏ธ
Reposted by Elaine Fultz ๐๐โฎ๏ธ
Reposted by Elaine Fultz ๐๐โฎ๏ธ
Reposted by Elaine Fultz ๐๐โฎ๏ธ
Breaking: The Supreme Court is now officially considering taking up a case overturning same-sex marriage.
This is the first time in history the court has considered rolling back this right.
This is the first time in history the court has considered rolling back this right.
Reposted by Elaine Fultz ๐๐โฎ๏ธ
Here's a fun little nugget from Trump's demand that DOJ pay him, personally, $250 million: In his memo, he argues that prosecutors "should have foreseen" that he has "immunity from prosecution for officials acts." Thank you John Roberts, great rule of law-ing, sir! static01.nyt.com/newsgraphics...
![Moreover, as former U.S. Court of Appeals Judge and now-Attorney General Merrick
Garland should have foreseen, President Trump had immunity from prosecution for
official acts.23 As such, given the Supreme Court's immunity decision and Judge
Cannon's dismissal of the prosecution on grounds that the Special Counsel's
appointment violated the appointments clause and his office was funded through an
19 Superseding Indictment at 1-4, United States v. Trump et al., No. 23-80101-CR, 2024 WL 3404555
(S.D Fla. July 15, 2024) (the original indictment was dated June 8, 2023).
20 United States v. Trump, No. 23-80101-CR, 2024 WL 3404555, at * 1 (S.D. Fla. July 15, 2024)
(hereinafter " Dismissal Orderโ).
21 Order Denying Motion for Franks Hearing and Reserving Ruling on Balance of Motion Pending
Necessary Factual Development at 9, U.S. v. Trump et al., No. 23-80101- CR (S.D. FL June 27, 2024)
(Document 655) (โBut the Court determines that some of the terms in that document ( e.g.,
'national
defense information' and โPresidential Records'), do not carry โgenerally understood meaning[ s]' such
that a law enforcement agent, without further clarification, would have known to identify such
material as 'seizableโ property'[.]"); accord. id. at 10 ("the present record does not indicate , for example,
whether the clarifying information in the affidavit was attached to the warrant or expressly
incorporated into it [See ECF No. 567 p. 13] โ) .
22 Constitutional Questions After the Raid on Mar-a-Lago, National Constitution Center 2 ( August 18,
2022), https://constitutioncenter.org/media/files/Mar-a-lago_Raid_Transcript.pdf .
23 Trump v. United States, 144 S. Ct. 2312, 2327 (2024) .](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:bpna2qi2e44fafbhhtqjak3x/bafkreicz6cwnbxxtz5qt3avx6tftshxlv6atsp6k23hmvgdffohy2aigmq@jpeg)
Reposted by Elaine Fultz ๐๐โฎ๏ธ
Reposted by Elaine Fultz ๐๐โฎ๏ธ
Reposted by Elaine Fultz ๐๐โฎ๏ธ
Reposted by Elaine Fultz ๐๐โฎ๏ธ
It's the guns ๐ฏ%
Reposted by Elaine Fultz ๐๐โฎ๏ธ
Robert Reich
@rbreich.bsky.social
ยท 11d
Reposted by Elaine Fultz ๐๐โฎ๏ธ
God
@thegodpodcast.com
ยท 11d
Reposted by Elaine Fultz ๐๐โฎ๏ธ
Reposted by Elaine Fultz ๐๐โฎ๏ธ
God
@thegodpodcast.com
ยท 11d
Reposted by Elaine Fultz ๐๐โฎ๏ธ
Reposted by Elaine Fultz ๐๐โฎ๏ธ
Reposted by Elaine Fultz ๐๐โฎ๏ธ
