Elise Cutts
@elisecutts.bsky.social
1.1K followers 1.3K following 1.6K posts
Science journalist is just a fancy way of saying "professional nerd." USian in Austria, language geek, collector of fine yellow zigzagged sweaters and etymology fun facts. Get my newsletter about big questions in science: www.reviewertoo.com 👽🌀🦋
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Elise Cutts
emdwarf.bsky.social
I would like a refund on 2025 please.
elisecutts.bsky.social
This feels like watching someone burn down an old growth forest. It's like, no, you cannot just replace those trees.
elisecutts.bsky.social
Fascinating stuff! The idea of creative destruction seems like an echo of how evolution innovates through turnover.

(And I know the committee member you quoted said there was no connection to science funding cuts, but it's hard to imagine they couldn't have anticipated it'd be seen that way!)
elisecutts.bsky.social
My science conspiracy theory is that literally everything is the Ising model
elisecutts.bsky.social
As someone from Portland I can't even begin to describe how in-character it is for this city to produce iconic resistance pictures of people dressed up in animal onesies.
elisecutts.bsky.social
Where do these guys hide to avoid becoming snail raisins when the sun comes out 😬
elisecutts.bsky.social
Feel free to recommend whatever, but I'm personally most interested in: sci-fi, surrealism, landscapes, art that translates some abstract concept into visual language, weird/creative uses of media, really distinctive styles, and comics. I'm less interested in character art (e.g. for RPGs) etc.
elisecutts.bsky.social
As a small act of anti-AI rebellion, I'd like to start following more human artists and see more human creativity in my feed.

Who are some of your favorites?
elisecutts.bsky.social
Now I want to know what the spookiest possible celestial body is, haha.
elisecutts.bsky.social
And of course there's the Van Gogh painting visible-wavelengths look, a classic.

Image: NASA/ESA/NOIRLab/NSF/AURA/M.H. Wong and I. de Pater (UC Berkeley) et al.
Acknowledgments: M. Zamani
Jupiter the way you imagine it: red and white striped, big red spot, lots of little storms, just a dazzlingly beautiful space orb.
elisecutts.bsky.social
Radio Jupiter is dressed up as... a bee?

Imagge: ALMA (ESO/NAOJ/NRAO), I. de Pater et al.; NRAO/AUI NSF, S. Dagnello
A radio telescope image of Jupiter that basically just looks like a striped marble. The stripes are red and yellow and there's a big black stripe down the middle. No red spots or storms in sight.
elisecutts.bsky.social
UV just at the poles can add an aurora hat to any costume.

Credit: NASA / ESA / J. Nichols (University of Leicester)
A visible wavelength image of Jupiter looking classic with its red and white stripes and great red spot, but with a swirling purple-ish aurora on the north pole.
elisecutts.bsky.social
Ultraviolet Jupiter is dressed up as an oil slick or an opal, depends on how edgy it's feeling when you ask.

Image: NASA, ESA, M. Wong (University of California - Berkeley), G. Kober (NASA/Catholic University of America)
A composite UV wavelength Hubble telescope picture of Jupiter looking PSYCHADELIC with cotton-candy pinks and blues everywhere and a great BLUE spot instead of a red one.
elisecutts.bsky.social
Different wavelengths ranges are... Halloween costumes for planets?

IR Jupiter is a pumpkin, a classic if maybe a little low-effort spooky look. (1/n) 🧪🔭
drfunkyspoon.bsky.social
Since spooky season is here: Jupiter in the infrared looking like an angry red pumpkin planet.
(Square-root-enhanced images of Jupiter's thermal emission from cloud tops at 5.1 microns from NASA's Infrared Telescope Facility in October 2020)
🧪
elisecutts.bsky.social
I don't know how we could ever transcend story or what a "simple reality" would look like without one, honestly. Arguably scientific theories are stories that that explain data. Collecting observations without theorizing wouldn't be very helpful for predicting things about the universe.
elisecutts.bsky.social
I've come around to thinking it's preferable to provide a least-wrong story than to provide no story at all. Because if you don't tell a story, someone else will.
elisecutts.bsky.social
Given the storytelling instinct, I actually think there's a danger in ~avoiding~ storytelling language in science communication. Scientists can't just present facts and expect people to receive them neutrally. Narrative abhors a vacuum.
elisecutts.bsky.social
If you walk on the beach, there's clearly no perfect boundary separating land and sea.

But if you want to draw a map of the beach for someone else, you'll need to draw a line somewhere — preferably somewhere reasonable.

Even if we have to write fictions, we can do our best to write true ones.
elisecutts.bsky.social
The frontier of science — especially in speculative fields — is a beach, not a cliff. There's no fine line between the known and unknown. Are you in the ocean once you're standing on wet sand? Does it only count once you're up to your ankles in the surf? Up to your knees?
elisecutts.bsky.social
More specifically, this post argues that our drive to turn everything into a story essentially guarantees that we'll fall for illusions of consensus — false impressions that scientists agree, even if they don't.

I think this is sort of inevitable, even if care is taken to communicate nuance.