Michael J. Taylor
banner
drmichaeljtaylor.bsky.social
Michael J. Taylor
@drmichaeljtaylor.bsky.social

Associate Professor, University at Albany SUNY
Greek and Roman History
PhD UC Berkeley

Economics 30%
History 25%

Although doesn't look like an ambush? Seems like two forces that know where the other is, although freely admit there are some really curious things here, like the cows...

Battle formations are quite rare in ancient art---this is decisive in my view (far more so than say, the Ineditum Vaticanum)

Italians were using Greek-style aspides to form close-order shield walls as coherent formations.

While the literary sources who unanimously attest the early Roman phalanx may not be reliable, we have a painting of two phalanxes facing off in an Oscan tomb from Paestum.

I've noticed my grades have shot up this year, and I am at grave risk of losing my reputation as a tough grader.

Herz argues that what we call Roman law was largely an elaborate political fantasy, a set of optimistic stories which veiled the violent and unpredictable realities of imperial autocracy, but whose contingent reception nonetheless shaped the nature of late antique and post-Roman law.

Autumnal Read: @zacharyherz.bsky.social *The God and the Bureaucrat.*

Written with great verve and infused with far more humor than one expects or deserves to find in a tome about Roman law.
If you want to know why Hegseth is panicking about reminders that there is accountably for giving or carrying out illegal orders, it’s likely because he knows he has given illegal orders to murder people.
Hegseth order on first Caribbean boat strike, officials say: Kill them all
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth issued a verbal order to kill all crew members in the Sept. 2 strike on a suspected drug boat. Navy SEALs fired a second missile.
www.washingtonpost.com

Moar Dad jokes …..
a close up of a man 's face with his mouth open .
ALT: a close up of a man 's face with his mouth open .
media.tenor.com

Laundering not launching. Whatever. I

NYT Times keeps launching its pro Trump bias.

+10 just for the muffins.

Romans pay for the privilege of going to war until 167 BC, although individual soldiers do receive significant material rewards: pay, loot, donatives, and land distributions.

They also get killed a lot.

But Roman voters--all former or future soldiers, vote to go to war virtually every year.

I know my suit doesn’t look good. I’m at peace with that

Here the period after the reforms of Ephialtes in the late 460s, and possibly coinciding with the coining of the term "democratia" itself. And yes, the elite literary sources are democracy-critical, although Old Oligarch admits the system works well on its own terms.

Or does Pericles position as a seemingly monarchic figure result from spending other people's money?

Its notable how the democracy typically chews up politicians and spits them out (Miltiades, Aristides, Cimon, Themistokles, etc.), but Pericles rides the bronco until his timely death.

Or, do naval and jury pay act like a sort of negative taxation, binding the demos to the extractive and external revenues.

Or does naval service just overwhelm the fiscal dynamic?

(my gentle critique of fiscal sociology in general is it ignores other ways of interacting with the state, especially military service)

Any thoughts from people who know more? (nakhthor.bsky.social, nevillemorley.bsky.social)?

Is Athens just like Norway, which has a ton of oil revenue but already had a democracy, and so was able to mobilize extractive revenues to fund a democratic socialist paradise?

But overall, the democracy is funded by extractive and external revenues in its most radical phase.

Athens is an exception to prove the rule. The democracy becomes most radical when its funded by a mix of Laurion silver and external tribute (phoros). Citizens only occasionally pay direct tax (eisphora), although they do soak the rich with liturgies.

It was the abolition of tributum in 167 BC, Tan argues, that really allowed the senatorial elite to dominate the state and extract and exploit provincial resources---voters cared less because it wasn't their money.

The analogy would be Gulf autocracies who run on oil revenues, not taxes.

In a brilliant book on the Roman Republic, James Tan argued that the populus was most assertive when citizens paid a hefty war-tax (tribute). As a result, they demanded control over war policy (banning fleets, extraordinary elections of commanders, etc.).

Teaching Greek history stumbled into a puzzle about ancient fiscal sociology, namely relationship between extractive external resources and democracy.

Conventional thinking is that democracy in general is closely linked with internal taxation. Taxpayers vote because they get taxed.

Very glad to see this series will run to four installations.

Helpful at the trial for felony bribery.

Operation Doryphoros and Sporus

Anyone interested in the hoplite controversy should tune into what promises to be an absolute banger of a series.

I guess technically that would have to be a PontiusBot.

Although this bs app should just spit back "What is truth?" to every query.