cruisysuzy.bsky.social
@cruisysuzy.bsky.social
11 followers 47 following 400 posts
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
... saw some owlhouse fan art, and now it occurs to me that Luz's palisman is shockingly similar to Vee
But Octproof is two more than hexproof! If you can't curse them when they're hexproof, you DEFINITELY can't curse them when they're octproof!
Leonardo tmnt:
Featherless✅️
Biped✅️

Leonardo tmnt is both the turtle, and the man
You already have professional. Skip to the next step.
Well! It would seem I was person 1 in this case! 😅
I am sometimes bad at parsing things. The person wearing the ditto hat did not know the hat was a ditto, but is playing along?
But the framing is so weird here. Why specify negative creator commentary, and not commentary in general?
Ngl I wasn't going to buy any UNTIL some creators were talking about the cards. I didn't end up buying much, just a couple singles, but I might not have otherwise.
Almost certainly.

Frankly I wouldn't be surprised if that was ALL this machine used in its initial dataset.
I also rediscovered dovescape says "non creature"
Meanwhile my Kykar, winds fury "Hey I just read how possibility storm and dovescape, two of my favorite cards, interact" deck is inconsistent, but fun. The mana costs of spells are often multipip so occasionally cards brick in my hand, but when I get so much value from each card I do cast, it works
Been goldfishing two jeskai decks, a colour combination I don't play often.

Gwen Stacy//Ghost Spider plays really smoothly. Lots of card advantage and good combat payoffs. I have a couple spider man cards but all of my "if I'm upgrading this is what I'm cutting" cards are spiders...
I guess what I'm trying to say is "The AI made to pass the SAT passed the SAT" isn't much of a headline. What is more interesting is what weights in learning actually helped achieve it.
I know, but it felt closer that the infinite typewriter analogy I used earlier, and (I hope) still gets across why it doesn't feel impressive
Or more likely, imagine a deck of cards, you reveal the top card. If it's not a 7, you remove it, then shuffle and repeat. If it is a seven you just shuffle and repeat. It shouldn't be surprising that eventually all you start pulling is 7s
Presumably it isn't connected to the internet at the point of testing.

That being said, framing an AI passing a test as an accomplishment feels... weird?

Passing tests is literally what they are designed to do.

Should I be impressed when the monkeys type Shakespeare?
But the cabin is bigger, so it's more effective
I only want one IF there's a completely rational explanation. Then it's funny.
Yikes!
(I kind of want one though)
((Also since you censored the main one, you might want to know it also is on the sleeve))