Chelsea Whyte
@chelswhyte.bsky.social
2.7K followers 250 following 120 posts
US editor at New Scientist. Co-host of Dead Planets Society podcast
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
chelswhyte.bsky.social
Who wouldn't? Break open all the moons!!
chelswhyte.bsky.social
ok i've been curious about it but now i'm afraid it will steal all my brainpower (what little i have)
chelswhyte.bsky.social
Yeah I went down a few Reddit threads hoping for an answer before I came back here. I really hope someone around here knows!
chelswhyte.bsky.social
What a curious expression. Do you know where it came from?
chelswhyte.bsky.social
This is all reminding me of that convo you had on Never Post like a year ago about when an email is important enough to use your computer vs the phone
chelswhyte.bsky.social
don't worry bout it, time isn't real
chelswhyte.bsky.social
Fair enough! Thanks for the chat, always nice to hear from scientists on their experiences with journalism
chelswhyte.bsky.social
I understand that position, and I'm curious how you feel about someone writing a story about a pre-print of yours without including your voice in it? Is a that a concern? I could see how it might not be, I'm just curious how it looks from your point of view
chelswhyte.bsky.social
Definitely. I'm mostly curious if researchers tend to prepare to talk about a pre-print the same way they would a paper, or if you see them as different enough to require different prep
chelswhyte.bsky.social
We should start with multiple infinities and go from there (ha)
chelswhyte.bsky.social
One of the problems, which I suffered myself, is that people are taught from a young age that maths is too hard or too boring for them. But when you get into it you find out it's so creative and amazing and delightful. But getting readers there can be tough! Worth keeping at it though :)
chelswhyte.bsky.social
Yeah, I totally get that. Our readers absolutely love maths stories, but explaining the incremental (though important) advances can be tough to get readers engaged, so it often tends towards the bigger findings or those with wider implications
chelswhyte.bsky.social
Yes, that's been my experience, too. Still, I find some scientists seem surprised we would read the arxiv and report on it at all, though plenty of people are willing to chat once we explain that's common in our line of work. It's just a difference in how we view pre-prints, I've noticed
chelswhyte.bsky.social
I'd be curious if you have thoughts to share on pre-prints, as that's often where I've seen friction. I've come across scientists who suggest a pre-print isn't published, as it hasn't been in a journal. While my colleagues and I see it as public information that has indeed been published.
chelswhyte.bsky.social
From the point of view of a journalist, this is fantastic and covers so many common misunderstandings of how the journalism side of things works.
Reposted by Chelsea Whyte
jjaron.bsky.social
Absolutely shocking and very worrying from NOAA www.newscientist.com/article/2469...
chelswhyte.bsky.social
When I was a kid I got banned from my school library for reading 6th grade books in 3rd grade so my mom took me to the city library and said I could take out any book I wanted
chelswhyte.bsky.social
The only disappointment here is the Dead Planets Society part of me, which wants the asteroid to crack the moon entirely in half
chelswhyte.bsky.social
If you were tested for flu, I think it would show up as influenza A, though it would take further testing to determine if it was H5N1
chelswhyte.bsky.social
plus a shocking amount of information about, let's see here, Trigger's broom in Only Fools And Horses? what is happening
chelswhyte.bsky.social
They have favorite things to be part of. Does that mean some of your atoms hate you? Yes.
chelswhyte.bsky.social
d) a mime getting ready to juggle
e) you drying your nails after a manicure
f) the beginning of a werewolf transformation