Branko Milanovic
banner
brankomilan.bsky.social
Branko Milanovic
@brankomilan.bsky.social

1) Income inequality; 2) Politics; 3) History; 4) Soccer.
Author of "Global inequality" and "Capitalism, Alone" (2019).
Stone Center, CUNY; LSE, London

Branko Milanović is a Serbian-American economist. He is most known for his work on income distribution and inequality.

Source: Wikipedia
Economics 47%
Political science 31%

Reposted by Branko Milanovic

Splendid text, by @newlefteviews.bsky.social, reviewing a book I haven't read, Beckert's, and one, @brankomilan.bsky.social's, which I would like to review
www.newstatesman.com/ideas/2025/1...
How not to talk about capitalism
The more it penetrates our daily lives, the less we seem to understand the “system that runs the world”
www.newstatesman.com

Perhaps French...and Corsican.
And Russian...and Georgian.
And German...and Austrian.

Reposted by Branko Milanovic

Just discovered that it's possible to stream quite a number of French-language films for free via this channel. One of them, l'Etabli, was already on my to-watch list. But if anyone has recommendations ... Note the category "dramedy"!
www.tv5mondeplus.com

Reposted by Branko Milanovic

"The Rise of Global Tariffs, Explained" | U.S. income inequality & China's private enterprise have created national tensions, according to "The Great Global Transformation," a new #book by economist @brankomilan.bsky.social. Via @yestare-nyc.bsky.social. www.practicalecommerce.com/the-rise-of-...

Reposted by Branko Milanovic

Reposted by Branko Milanovic

Always troubled by this from @brankomilan.bsky.social but wonder at what level of income we could have lives as good as we have now just by cutting out the crap. And that's complicated for many reasons. You can't do that individually and also involves illiberal judgements about what's crap
The Illusion of “Degrowth” in a Poor and Unequal World - Stone Center on Socio-Economic Inequality
An excerpt from Branko Milanovic's latest book, The World Under Capitalism: Observations on Economics Politics, History, and Culture, a 2025 collection of his essays from the last decade.
stonecenter.gc.cuny.edu

are created and driven by economic, social and political forces.
To understand their rise (and eventual fall) you have to understand society.

I can sympathize with people who suffer from TDS. I have had similar syndromes before. But, if you are serious and try to think things through, you have to realize that individual leaders, however important they seem to the naked eye,

I don't think that anybody knows (incl. Gorbachev himself) what his objectives or his inspiration were. I think Deng saw him correctly; he said (perhaps too harshly) "he is an idiot".

Tucker has a two-volume biography of Stalin (it was planned for three). Both excellent. But to have 4 enormous volumes on LBJ? Really?

When you see the Caro exhibition in the New York Historical Museum, you think it is a self-indulegent conceit to write biographies that run for 4,000 pages. Kershaw has a two-volume biography of Hitler.

To reinforce this point. Both Proust and Marx wrote in many volumes. A la recherche was published in 7 or 8 volumes: Capital obviously in three. So not a single book was running to 1,000 pages as many contemporary books do.
Today's writers should realize than in 99.999 % of cases they are neither Proust, nor Marx, nor Tolstoy. And if they are paid lots of money to stay at home and write, it does not mean that we are all dying to read them.
And that 99.999 % of people who write about their books have not read them.

My new Substack.

Writing in several volumes is much better if you really need 1,000 pages.

No, I do not think so. Soviet reforms were different: "state orders" instead of central planning. Never management by workers. For some reason it was never a popular option in the USSR since the Workers' Opposition was defeated in the 1920s.