Naomi Waltham-Smith
auralflaneur.bsky.social
Naomi Waltham-Smith
@auralflaneur.bsky.social
Professor at Oxford. Politics of listening, continental philosophy, music and sound studies, academic freedom. On the left. Views mine.
Smith misconstrues academic freedom:

“Institutional autonomy [means] it is the responsibility of government to set in place the objectives and vision for the sector…Having set out that vision, I’m afraid there is an element of saying to the sector, ‘What are you going to do now to deliver that?’”
November 19, 2025 at 6:27 PM
Reposted by Naomi Waltham-Smith
Today's asylum proposals risk worsening problems & causing deep worry for people trying to build safe, stable lives with their families.

Current serious problems such as huge backlogs & hotel use stem from Home Office policies not our human rights laws (1/5)
November 17, 2025 at 5:28 PM
Reposted by Naomi Waltham-Smith
You are not going to be able to pull together the anti-Reform coalition if voters don't see you are meaningfully different to Reform.

Mad reaction from the government given an increasing threat on the left.
November 16, 2025 at 9:06 PM
When the institutional capacity for rigorous journalism and critical public scrutiny is fast eroding and facing brutal attacks, it’s time to return to a classic.
November 16, 2025 at 5:29 PM
Reposted by Naomi Waltham-Smith
🗣️ Matt Foot, Co-Director:
“Reducing jury trials will inevitably increase miscarriages of justice. Prisons are overcrowded — and the backlog is caused by underfunding and overcharging, not juries.”

📖 Read our full response to the Leveson review:
👉 appeal.org.uk/levesons-out...
Leveson’s Outcomes: A Grave Threat to Justice • APPEAL
compensation wrongful conviction scrap the test matt foot radio 4
appeal.org.uk
July 9, 2025 at 12:15 PM
Strikes me both are symptomatic of one variant of Labourism or another
Looking at this fiasco, and the mess Starmer is making of government, it’s looking more and more like the defeat of Corbynism was about its own limitations rather than the Machiavellian machinations of the Labour right
Three people who’d be expected to be Your Party bigwigs have largely walked away from Corbyn’s project: former NE mayor Jamie Driscoll, former Labour MP Beth Winter, and former ANC MP Andrew Feinstein.

I have some new intel on the fall-out, if you’re interested in that sort of thing… 🧵
November 16, 2025 at 1:37 PM
Reposted by Naomi Waltham-Smith
The only Legitimate Concerns about asylum seekers are concerns for their well being and safety. For a rich country like ours to incessantly whine about these people as if we are their victims is perhaps the single most pathetic spectacle in British politics over the past quarter century.
No, I'd say it's racists and those pandering to them.
November 16, 2025 at 7:19 AM
A leader capable of inspiring with critical nuance—and a theory of art’s heteronymy on which a defence of its freedom can be built without a crude political reduction (also shared with Benedict to be fair). Complete contrast to the political & media class’s using crude economism to destroy the arts.
Some inspiring words on cinema in the streaming era from the Pope.

Yes, THAT Pope.
November 16, 2025 at 1:19 PM
Reposted by Naomi Waltham-Smith
Do you believe the justice system can make society fairer & want to help make this happen?

If you’re a budding professional, join NextGen JUSTICE60, a new network for future leaders advancing justice through giving, mentoring & collaboration.

Learn more: justice.org.uk/get-involved...
November 13, 2025 at 4:57 PM
Pluribus is a dark satire of society as resonance or mimetic contagion—a critique fit for our times of pseudo-totality as manipulated seriality Theorists of sonic materialism take note!
November 16, 2025 at 12:55 PM
Those of us who actually wanted democratic socialism already knew by the time he made his leadership bid in January 2020 that Starmer was incompetent and uninspired. Let’s not forget which fractions of the party (and media class) swung behind him and which opposed him.
November 15, 2025 at 11:17 PM
Reposted by Naomi Waltham-Smith
The alienation of young people can be blamed on Covid, phones and much else. But those are exacerbations. The real cause is rent exploitation in all its forms. It is neoliberalism that is destroying the lives of young people. And that is why it has to go. www.taxresearch.org.uk/Blog/2025/11...
Young people are alienated by neoliberalism
As the FT notes today, in another excellent article by John Burns-Murdoch: In the UK [the number of] ... young people who are increasingly disengaged from not only the economy but the rest of society ...
www.taxresearch.org.uk
November 14, 2025 at 8:02 AM
Very good commentary from Tom eschewing reduction to the palace coup framing without dodging the issues of who has the power to determine accountability.
November 12, 2025 at 7:57 PM
Signup sheet for the last seminar session I’m teaching this term: I might be taking this whole “case of Wagner” thing a bit seriously…
November 11, 2025 at 8:56 PM
Who knew that The Morning Show is the news? 😂
November 10, 2025 at 7:39 PM
This—what the public listens to impacts polarization and the quality of public reason
Here’s the same data, but with trust broken down by political views (circles are trust among people on the left, +s the right).

It’s not just that the BBC is widely consumed — it also has solid trust on both left & right, whereas trust in the biggest US media brands is hugely polarised.
November 10, 2025 at 7:03 PM
Overjoyed to have been awarded an AHRC LUCIA grant to continue work with @justicehq.bsky.social, United Borders & members of @artnotevidence.bsky.social to increase awareness of rap’s aesthetic & socio-cultural value to combat criminalization & racial disparities in the criminal justice system.
November 10, 2025 at 3:57 PM
There are many problems with the 1st Amendment regime: e.g. time, place & manner restrictions are readily deployed to silence marginalized voices and dissent. There is arguably much to commend the more nuanced jurisprudence and hierarchy of protection under the ECHR for being more egalitarian.
There’s a number of commentators who’ve criticised the UK’s free speech laws in recent times, with I think some justification. But it’s worth noting that the First Amendment doesn’t defend itself and speech in the US is being criminalised as well.
It's impossible to overstate how much of what ICE is doing on the ground reflects this completely preposterous conflation of hostile *speech* and hostile *conduct.*

The First Amendment protects—or, at least, is supposed to protect—the former up and until it's a "true threat," which none of this is.
November 5, 2025 at 8:25 AM
Reposted by Naomi Waltham-Smith
Zohran's campaign was his determination to make New York a city everyone can afford to live in. Huge congratulations!

His success will resonate throughout the world. A story where no one is left behind.

It's time to write that story across England & Wales too.
November 5, 2025 at 7:03 AM
Congratulations, NYC!
November 5, 2025 at 6:20 AM
Important report on by-and-for organizations’ role in making audible the often marginalized voices of affected communities:

“There are things that you can’t do as an individual but once you are an organisation, you can easily get your voice heard”—Ruth Ngwata, Coventry Empowered African Women Group
By-and-for organisations are a critical part of society.

They providing essential services and a voice for communities and populations often missing or excluded from the workplace, the charity landscape, and within spheres of influence and policymaking.

Learn more:
neweconomics.org/2025/09/buil...
Built by us
Understanding the distinctiveness of by-and-for organisations
neweconomics.org
November 2, 2025 at 10:29 AM
Let’s stop dignifying propagandists without an ounce of rigour or integrity with the term “activist.” Or maybe my much loved colleagues in political science might gently be encouraged not to expend anymore outrage on someone who is nowhere near in Faiza’s league as an activist or intellectual.
October 30, 2025 at 7:19 PM
Reposted by Naomi Waltham-Smith
It's increasingly obvious that Labour's strategy - call it Starmerism, Blue Labour, whatever - has got it badly wrong. It has alienated the party's core vote while failing to win over those leaning to Reform. There was no shortage of people warning them they were getting it wrong either.
Three years ago, Labour was polling in the 50s.
October 28, 2025 at 12:02 PM
When you have senior figures at the major UK research funding bodies saying universities should do less research and that cross-subsidy from international fees is required because they’ve doing too much research, you see how anti-intellectualism is setting in at policy levels.
"We’ve made it about individuals, because the academic research system is very focused on the individual level, and that’s something we really need to break,” she said.

Yes, break the focus on individuals. After all, the system is doing its best to break individuals altogether at this time. 1/3
REF must ditch focus on individuals, says Ottoline Leyser.

Former UKRI head also echoes previous calls for universities to do less research.

www.researchprofessionalnews.com/rr-news-uk-r...
October 29, 2025 at 6:30 AM
This is why “listening” isn’t reducible to something like “resonance” or even “sympathy.” The necessary conditions for feeling heard go include doing something with what is heard beyond echoing to responding and acting on it.
Maybe they could try giving people some hope that their lives could improve instead of just promising misery and cruelty
October 27, 2025 at 8:55 AM