Aaron T. Pratt
@aarontpratt.bsky.social
1.2K followers 260 following 260 posts
Pforzheimer Curator of Early Books & Manuscripts at the Harry Ransom Center. Bibliographer, book historian, and VHS guy.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Aaron T. Pratt
a tiny bit of good news is that we have secured funding to digitize john milton's copy of holinshed's CHRONICLES (1587).

the images will form part of MILTON'S LIBRARY, an open-access site featuring the 10 books positively identified as milton's w/ transcriptions/translations of his marginal notes.
A close-up image of a handwritten note in a sixteenth-century book. The note reads: 'Spenser repor / teth otherwise / [o]f this Knight / [D]ialogue of Ire- / [la]nd / [p]. 76.
Oh fun. So analogous to what's happening at the front.
Oh wait—looked at your pagination statement. Looks like it's just 1 leaf and not an 11-leaf monstrosity.
Oh, incidentally—I'd avoid superscripted 1s. For those single-leaf deals, just so a regular ole "1". Tell me about that final gathering? 11 leaves? What is the actual structure of it? Where does the non-conjugate leaf fall?
OK, so I'd probably do Aaaaa1 "5A"-"5E"². (You could even do 5A1 "5A"-"5E"².) I don't employ quotation marks in collation statements lightly, but this is an instance where conventional shorthand creates ambiguity about what's on the sheets.
Sorry, I'm seeing your other reply now. Actually "5A". And everything from leaf forward has "5" prefixed rather than five actual letters?
Or, wait: is it that you have one system, where alphabets double by adding minuscules, and another, where alphabets are all caps? Aaaaa vs. AAAAA? If that, I'd avoid doing any xA and just expand 'em.
If there are two leaves signed "Aaaaa," I'd go this route: ᵡ5A1 5A-5E². An alternative would be to do 5A1 ²5A-5E², but since you're just looking at a single leaf, it'd be a little odd to have it count as a whole alphabet.
Actually, the $1(+[pi]2) bit could just be $2 depending on whether you think the main signing count should reflect structural modifications—or something else entirely, of course, depending on how the rest of the book shakes out.
Or if you’re not a Tansellean stickler like I generally am:

π²(π1 + a²) [$1(+π2); π2 = ‘b’]
That slash notation is unfamiliar to me.

A situation like this one is why collation formulas should be coupled w/ signature statements: you can deal w/ structure & odd signing separately. I’d do:

π²(π1 + 1.2) [$1(+π2); π(1) = ‘a’; π2 = ‘b’]

(if a2 is signed, then add “π(2) = ‘b2’)
Such a cool book. I got a bit overzealous at an auction a few years ago after losing the lot I really wanted and ended up with a 1613. Glad I did!
Here are the two pages on display from our cover-to-cover digital facsimile:

603v: hrc.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/coll...

604r: hrc.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/coll...
Pages 603v and 604r in the Ransom Center's Gutenberg Bible. They contain the end of Titus, all of Philemon, and the beginning of Hebrews.
New Gutenberg Bible opening @ransomcenter.bsky.social. Partytime excellent.
The Harry Ransom Center’s copy of the Gutenberg Bible open to the end of Titus through the beginning of Hebrews on a plexiglass cradle behind glass with a printed label in front.
Reposted by Aaron T. Pratt
Yeah, I think the best approach would be to do what we do when there are too many authors: throw in an "etc" (as opposed to an "et al.," since places aren't people) unless a full list is needed to disambiguate very similar bibliographic entities.
Does the Zotero implementation at least have a rule to apply places to < 1900 pubs?
Reposted by Aaron T. Pratt
As far as I know (and please correct me if I’m wrong!) the only pulp paperback to have been printed with fuzzy textured elements on the cover. #DailyPaperback
Two Much by Donald Westlake. Title is in pink fuzzy textured lettering. Two blonde white women are wearing bikinis made of the same pink fuzzy textured lettering and a white man in a suit lounges on the ground beneath them. Close up of the textured bikinis Close up of the fuzzy letters
Here’s what appears to be a nail/brad head in the @ransomcenter.bsky.social’s lone Catholicon leaf, from the Galliziani impression (or, if you insist, issue):
Essential viewing.
Rare Book School has posted a lecture by Paul Needham on his most recent work on the Catholicon Press: youtu.be/o4aMEB38slw?... Paul is in good form and his presentation of the evidence is clear, whether you're on board with the theory or not.

#bookhistory
"The Catholicon Press Revisited: The Evidence of Nailheads"
YouTube video by Rare Book School
youtu.be
Format woes action shot (eventually figured it out):
On my way back to Austin and @ransomcenter.bsky.social after running a seminar on descriptive bibliography @calrbs.bsky.social.

Books were collated. Formats were determined—and in some cases deemed undeterminable.

Join me next year!