By ignoring small tech intrusions, society lowers the bar for what counts as privacy.

Case taken by academics against two colleagues and the university is considered a major test case for hate speech in Australia

Australian Catholic University used an AI tool to falsely accuse students of cheating us an AI, taking months to clear their name.

A Wiley journal has retracted a paper more than a year after a researcher reported the work was hers and had been stolen by a reviewer for another journal. As we reported in July, Shafaq Aftab, now…

While OpenAI's Sora has some guardrails around the likenesses of living people, protections around the likenesses of those who have died appear to be an afterthought.

Educational neuroscience has expanded its influence since the 1990s, positioned as advancing new forms of intervention in educational policy and practice. Simultaneously, the gap between the neuros...

Ana BrandusescuWhether in self-regulation or government regulation, Big Tech influences the direction of governance of AI, which increasingly is evolving to governance by AI and the automation of jobs...

Researchers conducted an experiment with 1,026 engineers in which participants evaluated a Python code snippet that was purportedly written by another engineer, either with or without AI assistance. The code itself was identical across all conditions—only the described method of creation differed. The results were striking. When reviewers believed an engineer had used AI, they rated that engineer’s competence 9% lower on average, despite reviewing identical work—and the penalty was more severe for women and older workers. This competence penalty points to a fundamental misalignment in how organizations approach AI adoption. While companies focus on access, training, and technical infrastructure, they overlook the social dynamics that determine whether employees actually use these tools.