Thomas Zeitzoff
@zeitzoff.bsky.social
9.4K followers 2.7K following 250 posts
Professor @au-spa.bsky.social Pol Violence | Pol Psychology New Book: “NO OPTION BUT SABOTAGE” https://global.oup.com/academic/product/no-option-but-sabotage-9780197796849 1st Book: "Nasty Politics" https://www.zeitzoff.com/book-project.html
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
zeitzoff.bsky.social
Thrilled to share the cover of my upcoming book, out February 2026 from @oxfordacademic.bsky.social

NO OPTION BUT SABOTAGE
The Radical Environmental Movement and the Climate Crisis

global.oup.com/academic/pro...
Cover image of my book. Orange cover with bold white font of the title, and a large wrench superimposed over a forest fire. 
No Option but Sabotage
The Radical Environmental Movement and the Climate Crisis
Thomas Zeitzoff

    Provides a unique perspective on one of the most important and salient issues facing the public: the threat of climate change and how activists are confronting it
    Features in-depths interviews with more than 100 past and current activists and experts
    Incorporates case studies of the radical environmental movement from origins of Earth First! to the ELF to ecofascism to present-day climate activists
zeitzoff.bsky.social
That’s a fair point. I see social media as downstream of these other effects (elite behavior and wealth concentration). And may amplify these things (giving a bigger megaphone), but it’s not the primary cause.
Reposted by Thomas Zeitzoff
tompepinsky.com
One piece of evidence in favor of Thomas’s argument is that every single other populist movement in human history emerged without social media
zeitzoff.bsky.social
I think there’s a comfort in blaming our current politics on social media.

When I think a boring but more accurate story is that plutocratic tech elites and right-wingers *made a lot of choices*.

www.nytimes.com/2025/10/14/o...
Edsall from NYT: “ The rise of the smartphone and the fall of western democracy” In an Oct. 2 essay posted in Persuasion, “It’s the Internet, Stupid: What Caused the Global Populist Wave? Blame the Screens,” Fukuyama, after nearly a decade of examining the causes of rising global populism, wrote, “I have come to conclude that technology broadly and the internet in particular stand out as the most salient explanations for why global populism has arisen in this particular historical period, and why it has taken the particular form that it has.”

The advent of the internet, Fukuyama continued,

can explain both the timing of the rise of populism, as well as the curious conspiratorial character that it has taken. In today’s politics, the red and blue sides of America’s polarization contest not just values and policies, but factual information like who won the 2020 election or whether vaccines are safe.

The two sides inhabit completely different information spaces; both can believe that they are involved in an existential struggle for American democracy because they begin with different factual premises as to the nature of the threats to that order.
zeitzoff.bsky.social
I think there’s a comfort in blaming our current politics on social media.

When I think a boring but more accurate story is that plutocratic tech elites and right-wingers *made a lot of choices*.

www.nytimes.com/2025/10/14/o...
Edsall from NYT: “ The rise of the smartphone and the fall of western democracy” In an Oct. 2 essay posted in Persuasion, “It’s the Internet, Stupid: What Caused the Global Populist Wave? Blame the Screens,” Fukuyama, after nearly a decade of examining the causes of rising global populism, wrote, “I have come to conclude that technology broadly and the internet in particular stand out as the most salient explanations for why global populism has arisen in this particular historical period, and why it has taken the particular form that it has.”

The advent of the internet, Fukuyama continued,

can explain both the timing of the rise of populism, as well as the curious conspiratorial character that it has taken. In today’s politics, the red and blue sides of America’s polarization contest not just values and policies, but factual information like who won the 2020 election or whether vaccines are safe.

The two sides inhabit completely different information spaces; both can believe that they are involved in an existential struggle for American democracy because they begin with different factual premises as to the nature of the threats to that order.
Reposted by Thomas Zeitzoff
darinself.com
I am curious what would happen if Dems ran on a plank of creating an anti-corruption agency with stronger independence than the Fed.

I think it would be highly successful because it would show "we will tie our own hands on this".
darinself.com
One lesson for pro-democracy advocates currently sitting in opposition around the world -- hammer incumbents on corruption and link strengthening liberal democracy (aka accountability) to anti-corruption efforts.
jayrosen.bsky.social
This is what I pay the New York Times for: www.nytimes.com/2025/10/12/w...
[Gift link]
zeitzoff.bsky.social
I’m a cautious optimist by nature.

As bleak as things sometimes feel, and as hard as coordination can be, success begets success. More people speak up, more people stand up for democratic values, and it becomes a virtuous cycle.
zeitzoff.bsky.social
Coordination is hard. Broad-based, pro-democracy coalitions are really hard.

Yet, I’ve still been deeply disappointed by civil society—especially CEOs who’ve stayed silent even as their core business are threatened.

But I’ve also been encouraged by the boldness of some local and state leaders.
zeitzoff.bsky.social
But that focus obscures the most important story right now: the growing willingness of the Trump administration to use state power (the DOJ, ICE, the National Guard, and even the military) to target and silence political opponents
zeitzoff.bsky.social
There’s been a lot of talk about political violence, whether left is more violent than right, and whether we’re at the start of a wave of left-wing violence.

www.foreignaffairs.com/united-state...
America’s New Age of Political Violence
What happens when the threat comes from both left and right.
www.foreignaffairs.com
zeitzoff.bsky.social
Some thoughts on where we are right now and the state of US democracy.

Trump is both deeply unpopular right now—and yet more politically powerful than during his first term, thanks to a pliant Congress and Supreme Court. That’s an uncertain, and dangerous, place to be.
Approval rating of Trump according to the Economist —he’s at -15%.
Reposted by Thomas Zeitzoff
brendannyhan.bsky.social
My new op-ed with @lkfazio.bsky.social:

Trump sent a 'compact' to our universities. They should reject this devil's bargain.
Any institution that yields to these broad and intrusive demands would forever be subservient to the whims of the government.
www.msnbc.com/opinion/msnb...
Reposted by Thomas Zeitzoff
xuxupolitics.bsky.social
Why do authoritarian states charge political opponents with non-political crimes? In our @thejop.bsky.social paper with Jennifer Pan & @yiqingxu.bsky.social, we examine how *Disguised Repression* undermines opponents’ moral authority and mobilization capacity. doi.org/10.1086/7342...
Reposted by Thomas Zeitzoff
meredithconroy.bsky.social
Democrats and Republicans distrust mass media for different reasons. For the GOP, hating the media is an in-group identity signal. The media is part of "the establishment," so they hate them.

Still, the dip in younger Dems trust in media is important to watch, too.
brendannyhan.bsky.social
Really striking data point from @gelliottmorris.com on Substack
Reposted by Thomas Zeitzoff
brendannyhan.bsky.social
🚨 New Bright Line Watch report on state of US democracy
brightlinewatch.org/violence-red...

-Expert ratings ~= since April but ↓ substantially since January
-US now most closely resembles an illiberal democracy
-Partisan gap in democracy ratings highest since 2017

Full thread of results below
Reposted by Thomas Zeitzoff
risabrooks12.bsky.social
It's easy to see this speech as just weirdly performative, but there's a lot more—and a lot worse—going on here.

The meeting & speeches are part of a larger project aimed at promoting the military leadership’s partisan alignment with the administration.

How? 1/
atrupar.com
Hegseth: "If the words I'm speaking today are making your heart sink, they you should do the honorable thing and resign."
Reposted by Thomas Zeitzoff
adambonica.bsky.social
Kept thinking about the debate between Klein and Coates and wrote down some thoughts.
Reposted by Thomas Zeitzoff
brendannyhan.bsky.social
No one outside the U.S. is confused and no one here would be confused if they saw this happening in another country.
billkristolbulwark.bsky.social
Hegseth fires general officers and JAGs, cracks down on dissenting views in military, orders killing civilians at sea without legal rationale, calls generals to Quantico to demand loyalty.

Trump deploys troops to U.S. cities.

"What are Trump and Hegseth up to? It's a mystery!"
Reposted by Thomas Zeitzoff
timfrye.bsky.social
So many echoes from this article for US politics....
Reposted by Thomas Zeitzoff
brendannyhan.bsky.social
"for now, we’re stuck in a ratchet, where violent losers copy one another, and their deeds become an excuse to oppress the rest of us."
zeitzoff.bsky.social
Two things are true:

1. Trump has amassed extraordinary power in the presidency—thanks to a compliant Congress and a pro-executive Supreme Court.

2. Trump is increasingly unpopular.

These twin dynamics will define U.S. politics through the 2026 midterms.

Buckle up.
zeitzoff.bsky.social
L’shanah tova!

🍎 🍯
Round challah and shofar
Reposted by Thomas Zeitzoff
zeitzoff.bsky.social
Watching too—Redford, Akroyd, Phoenix, Strathairn, McDonnell, Kingsley, and Earl Jones. The cast is 🔥
zeitzoff.bsky.social
Two things to add to this:

1) I am much more concerned with party elites and leaders encouraging and stoking violence than shifts in the public from vaguely worded questions.

2) These public shifts in support for violence are almost always downstream of elite rhetoric and narratives.
brendannyhan.bsky.social
These estimates of public support for violence (from www.nytimes.com/2025/09/16/o...) are inflated - *much* higher than what we and others have found using question wording that reduces acquiescence bias: brightlinewatch.org/accelerated-... The vast majority of Americans reject political violence.