oz ꆛ
@tttotality.bsky.social
330 followers
1.8K following
35 posts
tattooer // noisemaker // voidfiller // birther of Spearmaiden Tattoo & Gallery in DTLA
Posts
Media
Videos
Starter Packs
Reposted by oz ꆛ
oz ꆛ
@tttotality.bsky.social
· Apr 21
Reposted by oz ꆛ
somedisguises
@somesurprises.bsky.social
· Apr 21
oz ꆛ
@tttotality.bsky.social
· Apr 17
Reposted by oz ꆛ
Reposted by oz ꆛ
Reposted by oz ꆛ
Reposted by oz ꆛ
Big DeVito Energy
@mayawest.online
· Mar 29
Reposted by oz ꆛ
Emily (but a ghost)
@2amwakeupcall.com
· Mar 23
I sometimes get the impression that people believe trans men to be at less risk of transphobic violence than they actually are.
By dint of being trans, both trans men and women are prone to being degendered and constructed as a predatory, sexual threat to women, against whom violence is justified.
By dint of being trans, both trans men and women are prone to being degendered and constructed as a predatory, sexual threat to women, against whom violence is justified.
[CN: account of serious transphobic violence in link]
I think people saying trans men should use women's public toilets to make a point should realise what they're asking trans men to risk.
www.them.us/story/trans-...
I think people saying trans men should use women's public toilets to make a point should realise what they're asking trans men to risk.
www.them.us/story/trans-...
Reposted by oz ꆛ
oz ꆛ
@tttotality.bsky.social
· Feb 25
oz ꆛ
@tttotality.bsky.social
· Feb 25
oz ꆛ
@tttotality.bsky.social
· Feb 23
Part of my installation“Rhizomatic Futures: Multiplicities in Motion” just prior to opening at the Edison Theatre in Long Beach last week. Audio by @tttotality.bsky.social
Read more about it here:
www.b1n4ryart.com/rhizome
Read more about it here:
www.b1n4ryart.com/rhizome
Reposted by oz ꆛ
Reposted by oz ꆛ
![Section 3(g) of the Gender Identity Order is admittedly slightly vaguer than Section 4 of
the Healthcare Order in that it only proscribes the use of "[fJederal [grant] funds [to] promote
gender_ idcology."
The Gender Identity Order, appears, however, to deny the existence of
transgender persons altogether. See Gender Identity Order $ 1 (describing the purpose of the order
as "defend[ing] women's rights and protect[ing] freedom of conscience by using clear and accurate
language and policies that recognize women are biologically female, and men are biologically
40
Case 8:25-cv-00337-BAH
Document 62
Filed 02/14/25
Page 41 of 53
male"); id. $ 2 ("It is the policy of the United States to recognize two sexes, male and female.
These sexes are not changeable and are grounded in fundamental and incontrovertible reality.")
The Court cannot fathom discrimination more direct than the plain pronouncement of a policy
resting on the premise that the group to which the policy is directed does not exist. Thus, Section
3(g) of the Gender Identity Order can only be read as doing exactly what Section-4 of the
Healthcare Order does
cease funding institutions, including medical institutions, that provide
gender affirming medical care to patients under the age of nineteen.
Thus, as with Section 4 of
Healthcare Order, Kadel mandates a similar finding of discrimination as to Section 3(g) of the
Gender Identity Order.](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:mlmouohgzbjofidukcp4pxf2/bafkreifbrt37exq6fjaxqrit6kxtuoqkkl47uxsuoylsryumtv6bbfx7zy@jpeg)
Reposted by oz ꆛ
Body Art by Laura D
@handle.invalid
· Feb 9
oz ꆛ
@tttotality.bsky.social
· Feb 11
Reposted by oz ꆛ
oz ꆛ
@tttotality.bsky.social
· Feb 3
oz ꆛ
@tttotality.bsky.social
· Feb 2