Stanton Glantz
@profglantz.com
51 followers 16 following 83 posts

Glantz retired from the University of California San Francisco faculty in 2020 after 45 years on the faculty and founding the UCSF Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education. Learn more at https://profglantz.com/about. .. more

Stanton Arnold Glantz is an American professor, author, and tobacco control activist. Glantz is a faculty member at the University of California, San Francisco (UCSF) School of Medicine, where he is a Professor of Medicine (retired) in the Division of Cardiology, the American Legacy Foundation Distinguished Professor of Tobacco Control, and former director of the Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education. Glantz's research focused on the health effects of tobacco smoking. .. more

Public Health 27%
Business 22%
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs

profglantz.com
This is certainly a good thing for the multinational tobacco companies that invented ecigs in the 1990s (pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27852893/). Not so good for the people who are addicted to them (publications.aap.org/pediatrics/a...).

profglantz.com
The question is: "De e-cigs actually reduce harm?" The answer is NO even if you only consider adults. Why? They don't help people quit in the real word and instead promote dual use, which is more dangerous than smoking.

I'm still waiting for you to engage the actual evidence as it exists today.
chancethegardener.bsky.social
I don't think #HarmReduction is an abstract idea.

Reposted by Stanton A. Glantz

chancethegardener.bsky.social
I don't think #HarmReduction is an abstract idea.

profglantz.com
Did you actually carefully read the statement and the references? What are the specific errors? It seems to me that you selectively quote (mostly old) things that support your predetermined position and ignore or discount the more recent evidence that does not support your position.
chancethegardener.bsky.social
I see that, but I don't believe an IPA statement is oracular omniscient truth. Seven years in tobacco control have taught me to question everything.

At a minimum, we must both admit that well-meaning experts now disagree. And I KNOW how ironic that is: Claiming "experts disagree..."

Reposted by Stanton A. Glantz

chancethegardener.bsky.social
I see that, but I don't believe an IPA statement is oracular omniscient truth. Seven years in tobacco control have taught me to question everything.

At a minimum, we must both admit that well-meaning experts now disagree. And I KNOW how ironic that is: Claiming "experts disagree..."

profglantz.com
The issue is not supporting harm reduction as an abstract idea, but whether e-cigs reduce harm. The new IPA statement concludes, "e-cigarettes are not an effective harm reduction strategy for adults and pose a serious risk to nicotine-naïve youth." Details at publications.aap.org/pediatrics/a...

profglantz.com
This argument is a distraction. As of Oct 2023 there were 11 epi studies of ecigs and heart disease (not counting the retracted paper) that show a statistically significant increase in risk (OR 1.24; 95% CI 1.05-1.46). And lots of clinical and biology studies on why. profglantz.com/2023/05/05/t...

profglantz.com
Yes, a campaign by ecig advocates did succeed in getting one of my papers retracted. For details on that in the context of ongoing industry efforts to attack my work and counter science generally, see the oral history UC published on me: digicoll.lib.berkeley.edu/record/267781 (PDF pages 248-268).

profglantz.com
This comment ignores the fact that studies that follow the same kids forward in time (longitudinal studies) consistently find a gateway effect. See profglantz.com/2025/08/26/t... If ecigs were just substituting for cigs, youth ecigs would not have increased way more than smoking dropped.

Reposted by Stanton A. Glantz

simonchapman.bsky.social
Which nations today forbid & punish political satire besides Afghanistan, N Korea, Myanmar & USA?

Reposted by Stanton A. Glantz

getitrightonmj.bsky.social
2/#AB564 = $180M cut annually & 25% reduction in required long-term funding. With federal help shrinking, CA can’t afford to gut prevention & childcare. The real drivers of the illicit market (i.e. overproduction) aren't addressed. @cagovernornewsom.bsky.social must veto!

Read FS: bit.ly/3IheHxN

Reposted by Mike Daube

profglantz.com
You have ignored the information in the papers I sent you about WHO is vaping and that ecigs expanded the epidemic.

Until you stop just repeating your (incomplete) arguments and engage those details it is not worth continuing this conversation.

Reposted by Stanton A. Glantz

chancethegardener.bsky.social
3/3
There are 3 ways to portray these changes:

DISHONEST: Smoking dropped, BUT vaping increased
ACCURATE: Smoking dropped in association with
increased vaping
PLAUSIBLE: Smoking dropped BECAUSE vaping increased

The 1st denies product substitution is plausible.

profglantz.com
But, thanks to ecigs dramatically increasing teen nicotine use, total nicotine use (cigs plus ecigs) is still above where it would have been absent ecigs.
chancethegardener.bsky.social
Teen smoking has dropped to a 50-year low, near nil.
monitoringthefuture.org/data/bx-by/d...
Teen use of ANY nicotine product has dropped to a 25-year low.
www.cdc.gov/media/releas...
Teen nicotine vaping dropped 70% over the past 5 years to a 10-year low.
www.cdc.gov/media/releas...

All GOOD news.
Prevalence/Trends
Substance Use Prevalence and Trends among 8th, 10th, and 12th Graders
monitoringthefuture.org

Reposted by Stanton A. Glantz

chancethegardener.bsky.social
Teen smoking has dropped to a 50-year low, near nil.
monitoringthefuture.org/data/bx-by/d...
Teen use of ANY nicotine product has dropped to a 25-year low.
www.cdc.gov/media/releas...
Teen nicotine vaping dropped 70% over the past 5 years to a 10-year low.
www.cdc.gov/media/releas...

All GOOD news.
Prevalence/Trends
Substance Use Prevalence and Trends among 8th, 10th, and 12th Graders
monitoringthefuture.org

profglantz.com
Did you read the papers I linked to? They answer your question.

profglantz.com
This is a great example of cherry picking data to give a misleading picture. Few kids are daily e-cig users or smokers. Setting a daily use standard radically understates the level of addiction. As ecigs have got more addictive, however, days used has increased. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36342713/

profglantz.com
By whom, specifically?

Yes, gateway and common liability are separate things. Lots of evidence gateway is real and common liability cannot explain all youth initiation. The papers I cited (separately) go into detail on both issues.

profglantz.com
Later research, based on more data (through 2018) found that decline in current cig smoking slowed in 2014 from -0.75 to -0.26 %/year pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33272598/. And direct observation of individuals shows kids who vape more likely to smoke pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40829950/