Stanton Glantz
@profglantz.com
Glantz retired from the University of California San Francisco faculty in 2020 after 45 years on the faculty and founding the UCSF Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education. Learn more at https://profglantz.com/about.
Please send the specific document. The recent WHO position on Tobacco Control and Harm Reduction www.who.int/publications... says “When it comes to tobacco, nicotine and related products, a [true] harm reduction agenda should never be a reason for light touch regulation or a deregulation agenda.”
WHO position on Tobacco Control and Harm Reduction
Publications of the World Health Organization
www.who.int
November 27, 2025 at 1:42 AM
Please send the specific document. The recent WHO position on Tobacco Control and Harm Reduction www.who.int/publications... says “When it comes to tobacco, nicotine and related products, a [true] harm reduction agenda should never be a reason for light touch regulation or a deregulation agenda.”
Reposted by Stanton Glantz
Plug the name "Farsalinos" into our Truth Tobacco Industry Documents #archive and you get over 6000 hits that chronicle a decade of work:
www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/all-industri...
www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/all-industri...
Industry Documents Library
www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu
November 12, 2025 at 3:14 PM
Plug the name "Farsalinos" into our Truth Tobacco Industry Documents #archive and you get over 6000 hits that chronicle a decade of work:
www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/all-industri...
www.industrydocuments.ucsf.edu/all-industri...
You still haven't answered my question. The industry has a practice of sending money through intermediaries dating back to at least the 1950s to allow people who eventually get the money to deny industry funding. How do you know KY wasn't one more example of that?
November 13, 2025 at 6:25 PM
You still haven't answered my question. The industry has a practice of sending money through intermediaries dating back to at least the 1950s to allow people who eventually get the money to deny industry funding. How do you know KY wasn't one more example of that?
In response to your hair splitting, I rephrase: You said your other research was supported by the Ky Institute for Study of Free Enterprise. They got Philip Morris money via Global Action (i.e., FSFW). Can you demonstrate that none of that laundered tobacco money ended up funding any of your work?
November 13, 2025 at 4:20 PM
In response to your hair splitting, I rephrase: You said your other research was supported by the Ky Institute for Study of Free Enterprise. They got Philip Morris money via Global Action (i.e., FSFW). Can you demonstrate that none of that laundered tobacco money ended up funding any of your work?