Sarah Quinn
@sarahquinn.bsky.social
3.8K followers 1.3K following 730 posts
Sociologist who studies American politics, finance, and political economy. Broadly interested in cultural categories and power.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
sarahquinn.bsky.social
I still remember my ** mom's** best friend's number
rlevay.bsky.social
I can still remember my childhood best friends’ phone numbers.
bleary.off-the-records.com
If anyone needs me I will be in the museum, lying down next to the bog bodies.
Reposted by Sarah Quinn
Reposted by Sarah Quinn
dieworkwear.bsky.social
I interviewed one of these factory workers in Los Angeles. She gets paid three cents to sew a zipper, five cents for a collar, and seven cents to prepare the top part of a skirt.

This is how fast fashion brands like Fashion Nova can put "Made in USA" tags on dress shirts that retail for only $25
"Every day at 6 am, Bilma boards a bus that shuttles her to downtown Los Angeles’s Fashion District. When she reaches the garment factory an hour later, she starts working immediately, without punching in. Like thousands of other garment workers in the United States, Bilma’s wages aren’t tethered to the clock but rather to the quantity of operations she executes. Three cents for a zipper or sleeve, five cents for a collar, and seven cents to prepare the top part of a skirt before she passes it onto the next sewing operator in line. Assembling an entire dress earns her a mere 15 cents. Bilma toils away on garments primarily for fast-fashion labels such as Fashion Nova, Lulus, and Lucy in the Sky, who prioritize quickly stocking on-trend items over the quality of materials. These companies peddle things like $80 maxi dresses, $25 poplin dress shirts, and $5 crop tops, all modeled by beautiful people and bedecked with the tantalizing promise of low-cost glamor." "This worker payment system, known as “piecework” in the garment industry, is how US-based manufacturers can sidestep labor laws that require companies to pay at least the minimum wage. Rather than compensating Bilma for the exhausting 12-hour shifts—a regimen that, according to LA County’s minimum wage requirement, should yield $202.80—her pay is determined by the individual tasks she performs, which can fluctuate daily. Despite her adept handling of hundreds of garments a day, Bilma’s earnings typically linger around $50 per day. That’s $300 weekly for the standard six-day grind and $350 if she opts for Sunday labor. Doing what she can with this modest income, Bilma spends $400 a month to live in a two-bedroom apartment with six other people, some of whom are day laborers. In this crowded arrangement, two occupants squeeze into each bedroom, while two more lay claim to the living room. Bilma sleeps in the corner of the bustling kitchen."
Reposted by Sarah Quinn
Reposted by Sarah Quinn
zp39a.bsky.social
It's gonna be sold as a luxury novelty at first then will be used to take real healthcare away from poor people.
Reposted by Sarah Quinn
lmacthompson1.bsky.social
I am writing this because it has swiftly become crystal clear to me that many people have no idea what is happening or how this works. Here is a thread for non-academics to put into context what just happened to Dr. Mark Bray, a fellow historian.
Reposted by Sarah Quinn
alondra.bsky.social
"It is not hyperbole to say that the future of higher education in America requires that every university reject it. If any schools capitulate, the pressure will be enormous on all to fold. The only solution is solidarity and collective action against this effort at federal control over higher" ed.
philipncohen.com
Chemerinsky: The Trump extortion demands are unconstitutional as well as odious (gift link). Me: Any school that signs must be shunned, faculty affected must walk. No room for this.
Opinion | Trump’s ‘Compact’ With Universities Is Just Extortion
www.nytimes.com
Reposted by Sarah Quinn
sarahquinn.bsky.social
That performance is one of my favorites of all time.
Reposted by Sarah Quinn
markigra.sciences.social.ap.brid.gy
The New York Times minimizing the unconstitutional assault on US cities so much that it didn't appear on the "front page" even on my big screen monitor. Had to export a pdf to capture the tiny headline. Truly atrocious. Does any major US news org care at all?
Screen shot of NYTimes online front page with tiny headline about Emergency powers circled in red. Red text on yellow saying "Unconstitutional invasion of us cities way down here!!! WTF NY Times." Another text saying "But at least I know where to find a tree house with rustic vibe" referring to NYT headline near top saying "6 Tree Houses You can Rent for Glamour With a Rustic Vibe"
sarahquinn.bsky.social
Add to that the repercussions for the environment and dangers of environmental racism, and most concluded that the costs far outweighed the benefits.
sarahquinn.bsky.social
By the end of the class, some students still wanted limited use of AI, but most advocated for it to be banned completely. They didn't want to use my work without my consent, and if they couldn't upload my slides to ChatGPT, the platform was rendered mostly useless for them anyway.
sarahquinn.bsky.social
I talked about how much work goes into making good slides. I said that feeding those slides to the model was a way of helping LLMs steal that work from me.

So I asked that students not use it to make study sheets, or generate comments for discussion.
sarahquinn.bsky.social
I stated this clearly: I was under no illusion that students could use LLMs however they wanted, but I did not give consent to feed any of my own materials from this class to any LLMs.
sarahquinn.bsky.social
Also, I used the Anthropic case as an example, and disclosed that my own work had been stolen and used to train models.
sarahquinn.bsky.social
What's new this year is that we had the convo in lecture 4 -- after they had learned a bit about racial capitalism (the topic of the class). This meant students readily connected the dots between LLMs and environmental racism, and labor exploitation.
sarahquinn.bsky.social
We first discussed how students use AI, and its costs & benefits. Here I'm non-judgmental and empathetic. Saving time really matters for stressed people under capitalism! Higher ed sorts by cultural capital and that's unfair!

So far, this is exactly what I have done in all of my other classes.
sarahquinn.bsky.social
Every quarter, in every undergrad class, I talk with students about what should be included in our LLM AI policy.

For the first time, most of the class decided that we should not allow AI at all.

Here's how we got there . . .
sarahquinn.bsky.social
It's a real mire, which makes me think that this would be an ideal time to do a study of the social construction of public opinion.
Reposted by Sarah Quinn
mims.bsky.social
*The AI boom = one of the costliest building sprees in world history

* Past 3 years' commitments are greater than the cost of building the U.S. interstate highway system

* Consumers must spend $800 billion on AI within a few years, to justify investment from 2023-24

www.wsj.com/tech/ai/ai-b...
This week, consultants at Bain & Co. estimated the wave of AI infrastructure spending will require $2 trillion in annual AI revenue by 2030. By comparison, that is more than the combined 2024 revenue of Amazon, Apple, Alphabet, Microsoft, Meta and Nvidia, and more than five times the size of the entire global subscription software market.

Morgan Stanley estimates that last year there was around $45 billion of revenue for AI products. The sector makes money from a combination of subscription fees for chatbots such as ChatGPT and money paid to use these companies’ data centers.

How the tech sector will cover the gap is “the trillion dollar question,” said Mark Moerdler, an analyst at Bernstein.
sarahquinn.bsky.social
Vader was a *delight* at cocktail parties, I'm told. And he always brought the most thoughtful house warming gifts.
sarahquinn.bsky.social
Thanks to the discourse I have had Blondie in my head all day.