Rebecca Raskin
@rjraskin.bsky.social
66 followers 330 following 5 posts
Former nonfiction editor at HarperCollins. Now a very tired med student researching science communication. Writing here: https://thosenerdygirls.org/nerdygirls/rebecca-raskin-wish/
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Rebecca Raskin
junoryleejournalism.com
David Simon, creator of ‘The Wire’, being interviewed by Ari Shapiro (NPR)
SHAPIRO: OK, so you've spent your career creating television without Al, and I could imagine today you thinking, boy, I wish I had had that tool to solve those thorny problems...
SIMON: What?
SHAPIRO: ...Or saying...
SIMON: You imagine that?
SHAPIRO: ...Boy, if that had existed, it would have screwed me over.
SIMON: I don't think Al can remotely challenge what writers do at a fundamentally creative level.
SHAPIRO: But if you're trying to transition from scene five to scene six, and you're stuck with that transition, you could imagine plugging that portion of the script into an Al and say, give me 10 ideas for how to transition this.
SIMON: I'd rather put a gun in my mouth.
rjraskin.bsky.social
I wrote about celebrities and worms, but more importantly, how worms are a major global health problem.
thosenerdygirls.bsky.social
Do we all have worms?
#Worms have been all over celebrity news lately, and there are a lot of TikTok creators who are selling worm “#cleanses.” But the average person in the United States isn’t usually infected by worms.
Get the full story from Rebecca Raskin-Wish:
Do we all have worms?
Worms have been all over celebrity news lately, and there are a lot of TikTok creators who are selling worm “cleanses.” But the average person in the United States isn’t usually infected by worms.
thosenerdygirls.substack.com
Reposted by Rebecca Raskin
spavel.bsky.social
I've been telling people for years that there is a difference between *reducing cost* and *moving cost around* - and LLMs are only doing the latter.

Maybe now that there is a study, they will listen...oh, who am I kidding.
AI-Generated “Workslop” Is Destroying Productivity
Despite a surge in generative AI use across workplaces, most companies are seeing little measurable ROI. One possible reason is because AI tools are being used to produce “workslop”—content that appea...
hbr.org
Reposted by Rebecca Raskin
jenrubin.bsky.social
If this scheme unleashes mass roundups and forced incarceration, decree would take us further down the road of cruel authoritarianism that other anti-democratic leaders have pursued. Forget anodyne terms such as “civil commitment,” which disguise a brutal and inhumane approach to homelessness.
jenrubin.bsky.social
Treating homelessness with a police force and curtailing strategies that work—all while slashing funding for the social safety net—is the sort of cruel, red-meat performative politics that juices up the MAGA base but does nothing to address the problem.
open.substack.com/pub/contrari...
Words & Phrases We Can Do Without
‘Civil commitment’ means locking up people without housing
open.substack.com
Reposted by Rebecca Raskin
Reposted by Rebecca Raskin
luckytran.com
NEW: The country's top medical and public health professional societies are suing RFK Jr for unlawful anti-science changes to government vaccine guidelines.
APHA Joins Leading Medical Professional Societies, Patients Sue HHS, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. for Unlawful, Unilateral Vaccine Changes

AAP, ACP, APHA, IDSA, MPHA, and SMFM Join Together to Stop Assault on Public Health 

 

Today, the American Public Health Association (APHA) joins the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), American College of Physicians (ACP), Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), Massachusetts Public Health Alliance (MPHA), Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM), and a pregnant physician, filed suit in American Academy of Pediatrics v. Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts to defend vaccine policy, and to put an end to the Secretary’s assault on science, public health and evidence-based medicine.
Reposted by Rebecca Raskin
atherton.bsky.social
Folks did you know you can just buy "Bad Jews" by @emilyctamkin.bsky.social? It's true! Maybe get a copy
for yourself and another for the Fox-addled in your life. www.harpercollins.com/products/bad...
Reposted by Rebecca Raskin
mcopelov.bsky.social
This is not the "Republican Party." It is the Fourth Estate carrying water for a Narrative™️ it is desperate to tell.

Today in "neither our media nor our political system is designed to deal with a far right authoritarian party"
Reposted by Rebecca Raskin
rbreich.bsky.social
Busting up big corporations and tackling Wall Street’s greed.

Getting big money out of politics. 

Strengthening unions and fighting for higher wages.

Medicare for all, paid leave, universal childcare...

This is the progressive populist agenda we need in America.
Reposted by Rebecca Raskin
iamhectordiaz.com
A Chicago Pope implies the existence of an MLA Pope and APA Pope
Reposted by Rebecca Raskin
drenderturmaud.bsky.social
So many ✨incredible✨ professionals have signed up to attend Take Your Kid to Publishing Day! Like… Ivan Taurisano @amynielsen.bsky.social
@naomikirsten.bsky.social @bookfairyangus.bsky.social & more! Please keep sharing about this FREE #kidlit event so more kids can join the fun! #writingcommunity
drenderturmaud.bsky.social
📣 Information for the summer 25 “Take Your Kid to Publishing Day!” free/virtual event is ✨LIVE✨ ! If you have a child interested in registering, or are an #agent/#editor/ author wanting to participate, find the link for more info below. Please 🔁! #kidlit

danielleturmaud9.wixsite.com/danielle-ren...
Take your kid to publishing day! Logo
Reposted by Rebecca Raskin
cingraham.bsky.social
A couple years ago the people banning books were like "we're not banning books we're just removing them from schools, you can still get them elsewhere" and now here we are
authorsabb.bsky.social
Texas! House Bill 1375 would allow civil suits against any bookstore that allowed children access to content the plaintiffs feel is “harmful to minors.” Most bookstores don't have the money to defend themselves against these suits. Add a public comment while it's still in committee.
House Public Comment
The purpose of this form is to aid Texas residents in electronically submitting public comments to House committees on measures or matters included on public hearing notices.
comments.house.texas.gov
Reposted by Rebecca Raskin
Reposted by Rebecca Raskin
timothysnyder.bsky.social
1/4. On the White House’s theory, if they abduct you, get you on a helicopter, get to international waters, shoot you in the head, and drop your corpse into the ocean, that is legal, because it is the conduct of foreign affairs.
rjraskin.bsky.social
Not to repost my own writing, but...
thosenerdygirls.bsky.social
#NAD+ is heralded by celebrities as the fountain of youth, but there’s no solid evidence to back that up. Though NAD+ shows some early promising benefits in animal studies and some human trials, there isn’t really enough data yet.⤵️
thosenerdygirls.org/nad-suppleme...
#supplements
What’s up with NAD+ supplements?
NAD+ is heralded by celebrities as the fountain of youth, but there’s no solid evidence to back that up.Though NAD+ shows some early promising benefits in
thosenerdygirls.org
Reposted by Rebecca Raskin
jksteinberger.bsky.social
As promised, here are the slides I shared with students to convince them to NOT use chatGPT and other artificial stupidity.

TL;DR? AI is evil, unsustainable and stupid, and I'd much rather they use their own brains, make their own mistakes, and actually learn something. 🪄
NO CHATGPT Or other artificial stupidity: motivation
First, clarity on distinguishing AIs:
Non-generative: grammar aid, translation, dictionary, text-to-audio (e.g. Natural Reader): no problem
As long as you use the appropriate tools (least intensive in data and server energy use).
Why? Because you provide the content. Your brain is doing the most important work
Generative: ChatGPT & Co. 
You only supply the prompt, the AI supplies the content.
Why is this delegation of work problematic?
3 domains: ethical, environmental, intellectual engagement.

(Caveat: generative is probably ok for computer programming, where it can be useful and save time. Not relevant to this class.)
1) AI and ethics
Mass theft of all and everything
«learning» on books, articles, blogs, social media, images, music, cultural production, without  permission of authors/creators, and leading to their mass joblessness. Profits are not reditributed to originators. 
Permanent destruction of the mental health of underpaid precarious tech workers in the Global South (Kenya, Philippines …):
«correction» to avoid production of violent and pedophile contents etc, tech workers are obliged to watch and correct super violent contents for days on end, leading to extreme psychological suffering and trauma, from which recovery is doubtful. No or little compensation (certainly not at the level of the suffering inflicted). 
In short, an industry built on theft of real human creation and sacrifice of real human health, profiting a few megafortunes. 
2) AI and (un)sustainability

Massive consumption of electricity, water, server capacity for generative AI. 
Outcome: keep fossil fuel companies in business, using up new renewable capacity, without any satisfaction of basic human needs.
Massive misappropriation of the finance necessary for climate and ecological action (renewable generation, efficiency and retrofit for buildings, public transit, infrastructures for cycling etc) towards AI industry. 
Overall: undermine climate action, reinforce fossil industry, waste resources necessary for human development. 
3) AI and intellectual engagement

First, what learning is (or should be) about:
The goal should not (only) be the reproduction of «correct» knowledge,
But mainly personal engagement and experience of thinking about topics of interest. Personal engagement = using one’s own brain. 
The most important activity for learning and intellectual engagement is the experience of making one’s own mistakes, by trial and error, corrections based on new ideas, starting over again. Learning to recognise nuances, knowledge gaps, better explanations 
This kind of learning is possible only through using your own brain, not AI. 
Also, Ais are not «intelligent». At all. 
They simply reproduce pre-existing patterns. They «bullshit», invent false references, false facts, false data, simply because those sound plausible. VERY DANGEROUS. 
If you learn how to NOT use AI, and how to research facts and data on your own, this will serve you and your communities for the rest of your life.
Reposted by Rebecca Raskin
methsaxon.bsky.social
New from @emilyctamkin.bsky.social on how down is not up: “Zelensky had simply said that Trump was living in a ‘disinformation space.’ That is only an attack on Trump if one considers telling the truth to be an attack on the president’s authority. Evidently, Vance does.“ slate.com/news-and-pol...
Other Countries See Trump for Exactly What He Is
He wants us to disbelieve our own eyes and memories. Ukraine’s neighbors have seen it all before.
slate.com
Reposted by Rebecca Raskin
lizneeley.bsky.social
We do this all to stay focused, not flooded. I share the sense we’ve made in a late Friday night debrief.

There is a lot to feel sad & sick about. I can’t tell you things will be okay, but I can tell you A LOT about efforts to make it better.

This was week 4.

buttondown.com/liminalcreat...
Week 4
Figuring out what to focus on now & what to focus on next in science and higher ed
buttondown.com