Lightnews — Scholar-powered news

Pádua Fernandes

@paduafernandes.bsky.social

730 followers 340 following 1.7K posts

Escrevo, pesquiso, entre outras coisas. Livro mais recente: "Ilícito absoluto: a família Almeida Teles, o coronel C. A. Brilhante Ustra e a tortura" (Patuá, 2023). Sítio: https://opalcoeomundo.blogspot.com/

Videos

Law 37%

Political science 35%

Posts Media Videos Starter Packs

Reposted by Pádua Fernandes

Ja.Ja.Jaded... 🚂🇵🇸🇵🇸🇵🇸💨 @aerojaded.bsky.social · 13h

Serviu Zé Pilintra com sucesso! #MisterUniverse #LucasLaet

8 130 570

Reposted by Pádua Fernandes

Natan Cunha @natancunha.bsky.social · 13h

Difícil pensar em alguém a quem o termo “ícone” caiba mais adequadamente sem o risco de incorrer na banalização do epíteto (a exemplo do que acontece com “gênio”).

R.I.P. a um ícone.

[📷: pôster de uma das suas performances mais impecáveis (filme lançado no mesmo ano de 'Annie Hall', aliás).]

1 2

Reposted by Pádua Fernandes

comunadeusaaaaaaa🍉 @nideoliveira71.bsky.social · 13h

noutra vida (década) escrevi sobre uma cena da Diane Keaton que A-M-O em Reds, onde ela deu vida à feminista Louise Bryant. defini como a cena mais biacate do cinema.

R.I.P. Diane Keaton! ❤️
share.google/F35fI2TkXgp0...

A cena mais biscate do cinema

São inúmeras as cenas do cinema que poderíamos classificar como biscates, mas nenhuma é tão ousada quanto a cena em que a feminista Louise Bryant intima o jornalista John Reed a transar com ela no …

share.google

1 3 6

Reposted by Pádua Fernandes

Frieda Wollmaus @frieda-wollmaus.bsky.social · 16h

Diane Keaton 🖤

You Don't Own Me - Bette Midler, Goldie Hawn & Diane Keaton

YouTube video by decay21450

m.youtube.com

7 73 240

Pádua Fernandes @paduafernandes.bsky.social · 20h

Vamos ver no dia quinze.

Pádua Fernandes @paduafernandes.bsky.social · 20h

Chocante reportagem da @apublica.org sobre o restaurante que desabou em São Paulo com vítimas fatais: apublica.org/2025/10/jami...

Jamile SP: Quem são os donos do restaurante que teto desabou

Empresários que se apresentavam como sócios do estabelecimento Jamile SP não constam nos documentos de constituição da empresa

apublica.org

1 2 11

Reposted by Pádua Fernandes

Unofficial BBCNews (World) Bot @bbcnews-world-rss.bsky.social · 21h

Anger after female journalists excluded from Afghan embassy event in India

Female reporters were excluded from an event at the Taliban government's embassy in New Delhi.

www.bbc.com

3 8 18

Reposted by Pádua Fernandes

Daniela Abade @danielaabade.bsky.social · 22h

Orgulho dessa minha primeira contribuição para @apublica.org . E, sim: é eita, atrás, de eita seguido de mano do céu!

apublica.org/2025/10/jami...

Jamile SP: Quem são os donos do restaurante que teto desabou

Empresários que se apresentavam como sócios do estabelecimento Jamile SP não constam nos documentos de constituição da empresa

apublica.org

45 150 540

Pádua Fernandes @paduafernandes.bsky.social · 1d

Golpe da dosimetria, ou a dosimetria do golpe:
opalcoeomundo.blogspot.com/2025/10/golp...

Golpe da dosimetria, ou a dosimetria do golpe

Esta dosimetria que se planeja no Congresso Nacional para os criminosos que atentaram contra democracia brasileira significa uma continuação...

opalcoeomundo.blogspot.com

1 4

Reposted by Pádua Fernandes

Aaron Reichlin-Melnick @reichlinmelnick.bsky.social · 1d

Judge Perry spends four pages going over the history of the debates around the Constitution as to the proper relationship of the President to a state militia, especially after overthrowing the British, who had maintained standing armies in the colonies against their wishes.

A. The Constitution
During the Constitutional Convention of 1787, one topic of hot debate among the
Founders was how to properly scope the federal government's military powers. Indeed, among
the grievances directed against King George Ill by signatories to the Declaration of
Independence was his keeping in Times of Peace, Standing Armies, without the Consent of our Legislatures." Decl. of Independence para. 13 (U.S. 1776). Thus, while the Founders recognized that well-trained soldiers were necessary "for providing for the common defense" of our young nation, they were concerned "that a national standing Army posed an intolerable threat to
individual liberty and to the sovereignty of the separate states." Perpich v. Dept. of Defense, 496
U.S. 334, 340 (1990); see also Reid v. Covert, 354 U.S. 1, 23-24 (1957) ("The Founders
envisioned the army as a necessary institution, but one dangerous to liberty if not confined within its essential bounds."). Further informing some Founders' suspicion of standing armies was the
fact that local militias of individual states had played a vital role in securing the recent victory in
the Revolutionary War. See Frederick Bemays Wiener, The Militia Clause of the Constitution,
54 Harv. L. Rev. 181, 182-83 (1940).
Another concern among some Founders was the extent of the federal government's
powers to deploy federal military forces-including federalized militia-for purposes of general
law enforcement. For instance, in response to a proposal to add language to the Constitution
which would empower the federal government to "call forth the force of the Union" against states that passed laws contravening those of the union, James Madison moved successfully for its removal, opining that such use of force against a state "would look more like a declaration of
war, than an infliction of punishment." Robert W. Coakley, The Role of Federal Military Forces
in Domestic Disorders 1789-1879 8 (citing Max Farrand, The Records of the Federal
Convention,…

come within the idea of an insurrection." Id. at 410. To this, Madison replied that "there might be
riots, to oppose the execution of the laws, which the civil power might not be sufficient to quell."
Id. (emphasis added). Patrick Henry pressed the issue, charging that granting power of "calling
the militia to enforce every execution indiscriminately" would be "unprecedented," and a
"genius of despotism." Id. at 412. To this, Madison noted the "great deal of difference between
calling forth the militia, when a combination is formed to prevent the execution of the laws, and
the sheriff or constable carrying with him a body of militia to execute them in the first instance;
which is a construction not warranted by the [Militia] clause." Id. at 415.
Confronted with such concerns, even federalist proponent Alexander Hamilton rejected
the notion that the militia could enforce domestic law, opining that given "the supposition of a
want of power to require the aid of the POSSE COMITATUS is entirely destitute of colour, it
will follow, that the conclusion which has been drawn from it, in its application to the authority of the federal government over the militia is as uncandid as it is illogical." The Federalist No. 29,
at 188 (Alexander Hamilton) (Jacob Ernest Cooke, ed., 1961). To Hamilton, then, it was nothing
more than an "exaggerated and improbable suggestion]" that the federal government would
command one state's militia to march offensively into the territories of another, given how
assuredly such conduct would invite "detestation" and "universal hatred" by the people of the
would-be usurper. Id. at 186-87.
On September 17, 1787, the U.S. Constitution was ratified. Many of the concerns debated
by the Founders reflect in its contours. Regarding the militia, the Founders chose to vest
Congress-not the President—with constitutional power "to provide for calling forth the Militia
to execute the laws of the Union, suppress insurrections, and repel invasions," U.S. Const. a…

disciplining the militia, and for governing such part of them as may be employed in the service
of the United States." U.S. Const. art. I, § 8, cl. 16. The President, then, would be the
"Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the Militia of the
several States, when called into the actual Service of the United States." U.S. Const. art. 2, § 2,
cl. 1.
That the Framers understood the Calling Forth Clause narrowly can be seen in
Congress's earliest efforts to put the clause into legislative practice. In 1792, Congress enacted
an Act to "provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the laws of the Union, suppress
insurrections and repel invasions." Act of May 2, 1792, 1 Stat. 264(1792). In 1795, Congress
repealed the 1792 Act and passed an amended version. Act of February 28, 1795, 1 Stat. 424
(1795). In both versions, Congress authorized the President to call upon the militia in response to
invasion or insurrection without much limitation. But for the President to call forth the militia in
cases where "the laws of the United States shall be opposed, or the execution thereof
obstructed," stricter controls were imposed. Id. Specifically, Congress authorized the calling
forth of militia only when the forces of obstruction were "too powerful to be suppressed by the
ordinary course of judicial proceedings, or by the powers vested in the marshals" by the Act. Id.
These early efforts demonstrate contemporaneous understanding that military deployment for
purpose of executing the laws was to be an act of last resort, only after other systems had failed.
Beyond the Calling Forth Clause, other Constitutional provisions respond to Founders'
concerns about specters of military overreach. For instance, the Founders chose not to
consolidate control over the nation's standing army and naval forces into a single branch of
federal government. Power to command was vested in the President, U.S. Const. art. II, § 2, cl. 1,
but power to actually "declare War…

Navy" entrusted to Congress. U.S. Const. art. I, § 8, cls. 11-13; see also The Federalist No. 24,
at 153 (Alexander Hamilton) (Jacob Ernest Cooke, ed., 1961) (noting "the whole power of
raising armies was lodged in the legislature, not in the executive") (emphasis in original).
Moreover, two of the Constitution's first ten Amendments articulate safeguards against the
military: the Second Amendment-with its assurance that well-regulated militias would be
prepared and armed to fight for the security of the states-and the Third Amendment, with its
prohibition on quartering of soldiers in times of peace.
Finally, the Constitution and its early amendments also reflect another long-standing
American principle: that the states possess a "residuary and inviolable dual sovereignty." The
Federalist No. 39, at 256 (James Madison) (Jacob Ernest Cooke, ed., 1961); see also Printz v.
United States, 521 U.S. 898, 918 (1997) ("It is incontestible that the Constitution established a
system of 'dual sovereignty"'); Carter v. Carter Coal Co., 298 U.S. 238, 294 (1936) (the
Framers "meant to carve from the general mass of legislative powers, then possessed by the
states, only such portions as it was thought wise to confer upon the federal government"). This
conception is reflected throughout the Constitution's text, but particularly in the Tenth
Amendment, which states that "the powers not delegated to the United States by the
Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the
people." U.S. Const. amend. X. These reserved and residuary powers include, among other
things, "the police power, which the Founders denied the National Government and reposed in the States." United States v. Morrison, 529 U.S 598, 618 (2000); see also Patterson v. State of Kentucky, 97 U.S. 501, 503 (1878) (the "power to establish the ordinary regulations of police has been left with the individual States, and cannot be assumed by the national government");
Carte…

6 91 370

Pádua Fernandes @paduafernandes.bsky.social · 1d

"In Fux we trust", certa vez foi dito.

Reposted by Pádua Fernandes

Reuters Legal @legal.reuters.com · 1d

Apple was sued by two neuroscientists — Susana Martinez-Conde and Stephen Macknik, professors at SUNY Downstate Health Sciences University — who alleged the tech giant used illegal 'shadow libraries' of pirated books to train its Apple Intelligence AI model reut.rs/48Zvz7d

1 6 13

Reposted by Pádua Fernandes

bittersweet sanfoninha 🏴 @joaoninguem.bsky.social · 1d

mas isso aqui é suco de brasil não coado

(via @piscianagrande.bsky.social)

6 6

Reposted by Pádua Fernandes

ricardosog @ricardosog.bsky.social · 1d

Então, o 'governador' que não quer que os bilionários, bets e bancos paguem mais impostos, mas cobrar ICMS sobre gorjetas não tem problema, né... 😡😡😡🤬🤬🤬

#GovernadorInimigoDoPovo

17 160 310

Reposted by Pádua Fernandes

Notícias do G1 (Não oficial) @g1-bot-rss.adilson.net.br · 1d

Derrite diz que etanol adulterado tinha mais de 40% de metanol e falsificadores foram prejudicados por organização criminosa

Na visão do secretário da Segurança, os adulteradores tinham a intenção de mudar as fórmulas das bebidas com etanol, mas compraram os combustíveis adulterados com metanol em postos de combustíveis ligados ao crime.

g1.globo.com

20 18 100

Reposted by Pádua Fernandes

Remedios 💊 @caixadoremedios.art · 2d

"A luta continua porque a vitória é certa!"

Tony Tornado, 95 anos ✨

7 130 740

Pádua Fernandes @paduafernandes.bsky.social · 2d

Ou seja, o que importa é escrever pretextos narrativos para merchandising...

Pádua Fernandes @paduafernandes.bsky.social · 2d

Que vergonha para a Globo.

Pádua Fernandes @paduafernandes.bsky.social · 2d

Deveria, mas acontecerá?...

1 1

Reposted by Pádua Fernandes

Jeff Nascimento @jnascim.info · 2d

A OAB reagiu às cenas do interrogatório dos suspeitos do assassinato de Odete Roitman em #ValeTudo, lembrando que ninguém deve ser ouvido sem assistência jurídica, essencial para um processo justo jnascim.info/O6xIpr

OAB se manifesta após cena com suspeitos em delegacia de ‘Vale Tudo’ | VEJA Gente

Reação foi motivada por repercussão de capítulo desta quarta-feira, 8

jnascim.info

17 41 270

Reposted by Pádua Fernandes

amIgor @igoramigor.bsky.social · 2d

depoimento sem advogado, sem gravação, sem anotações... produção de prova do Inquérito na base do "eu lembro dela ter dito"

6 2

Pádua Fernandes @paduafernandes.bsky.social · 2d

Concordo, mas espero que o próximo nome não seja pior.

Pádua Fernandes @paduafernandes.bsky.social · 2d

Ah, lembro disso. É algo coletivo deste campo, o meio jurídico: ver como "campeão" do constitucionalismo (neo, velho, sei lá) um antigo inimigo dos direitos sociais.

Reposted by Pádua Fernandes

Rachel Gilmore @rachelgilmore.bsky.social · 2d

BREAKING: Israel’s government just approved the first phase of the ceasefire deal and a ceasefire is supposed to go into effect immediately.

Israel killed at least 29 Palestinians today, according to Al Jazeera.

CNN headline: Israeli government approves Gaza ceasefire resolution

CNN article screenshot reads: Where things stand
• JUST IN: Israel's government has approved the US-brokered Gaza ceasefire and hostage release resolution, according to the prime minister's office. Officials have said the ceasefire will take effect
immediately.
• US presence: The United States is sending 200 troops to be on the ground to monitor the plan's implementation, a senior US official said. "No US troops are intended to go into Gaza," another official said.

Al Jazeera update reads: Four killed al-Sabra attack, bringing day's death toll to 29: Wafa

The Palestinian news agency has reported that four people have been killed in the Israeli attack we've been reporting in the Sabra neighbourhood in Gaza City.
That brings the day's death toll in Gaza to 29, according to the news agency, despite the ceasefire breakthroughs.

14 120 340

Reposted by Pádua Fernandes

Antonio Luiz M. C. Costa @aluizcosta.bsky.social · 2d

Oito meses depois de ser demitido como assessor do PSol na Câmara, meses que passou brigando contra o PT e o próprio partido (principalmente Boulos) no Xitter, o David Deccache deletou sua conta

1 4

Pádua Fernandes @paduafernandes.bsky.social · 2d

Tão desafinado ao cantar quanto ao governar.

Reposted by Pádua Fernandes

Le Monde @lemonde.fr · 2d

Les alcools forts déconseillés aux Brésiliens après une vague d’intoxications mortelles

Une vague d’empoisonnements au méthanol, un produit utilisé pour fabriquer illégalement de l’alcool, a déjà provoqué cinq décès et plusieurs dizaines d’hospitalisations. L’énorme marché brésilien des boissons frelatées est pointé du doigt.

www.lemonde.fr

2 6

Reposted by Steven French, Pádua Fernandes

Hari Kunzru @harikunzru.bsky.social · 3d

Couldn’t be happier that the Nobel has gone to Laszlo Krasznahorkai. Back in 2012 I tried to astroturf a movement claiming him as the Next Big Thjng but it didn’t take off because he’s too difficult www.theguardian.com/books/2012/j...

Why is New York's literary crowd suddenly in thrall to Hungarian fiction? | Hari Kunzru

Hari Kunzru: The highly educated aspiring writers of New York are looking beyond the English-speaking world for their reading fixes. It must be a sign of the times

www.theguardian.com

8 70 390

Reposted by Pádua Fernandes

Manfredovski @manfredovski.bsky.social · 4d

A programação matadora do cinesesc

1 1 3

Reposted by Pádua Fernandes

Beatriz Diniz @beatrizdiniz.bsky.social · 4d

Pressão indígena leva governo a rever nomeação para cargo na saúde 🏹
Presidente Lula determinou a exoneração do parente do senador defensor de garimpo ilegal e o atendimento à escolha das comunidades.

reporterbrasil.org.br/2025/10/gove...

Familiar de senador bolsonarista é demitido após pressão Kayapó

Familiar do senador Zequinha Marinha, Casimiro Marinho foi exonerado do comando de órgão de saúde indígena no Pará após pressão dos Kayapó

reporterbrasil.org.br

2 8 28