Barrista
@onbluskysku.bsky.social
1.9K followers 1.2K following 28K posts
Lawyer, Pittsburgher, reader of too few books, enjoyer of too many jokes
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
I wouldn’t characterize the Nuremberg trials as a state of exception this way
Yeah she could win these are ridiculous numbers for an election that isn't even this YEAR
Politics often depends on the richest in society.

That's why I'm SO proud of our campaign. We're funded small dollar donors. We've raised almost 6x more in donations under $200 than the next five candidates in my race COMBINED.

We're by and for the people — NOT corporations and billionaires.
screenshot of a FEC fundraising table, sorted by amount raised from brackets of donations. It's sorted by $200 and under donations:

Abughazaleh, Katherine M.
$1,158,374.00

Biss, Daniel
$70,333.23

Fine, Laura
$43,578.61

Huynh, Khai-Hoan
$39,758.40

Simmons, Mike
$22,965.33

Andrew, Philip Jerome
$21,469
Like once we're past conforming ourselves to some notion that laws written in words can have meanings that bind us, even in revolutionary situations, what's with keeping up the rest of the LARP?
I guess the relevant question is why bother with the theatrics of law at that point? It seems so expensive and annoying to interpret statutory law that way and deal with courts and judges and everything, why not just haul them out by their collars in front of their homes and use a bolt gun?
It's both good to file it and good that the judge is probably gonna deny it
I am shocked, shocked to find that gambling is going on in here
2017: Ted Cruz (R-TX) blames the porn on his personal twitter on a rogue staffer.

2025: Dave Taylor (R-OH) blames the Nazi flag on a (presumably, not rogue?) staffer's desk on an unnamed vandal.

Personal responsibility for thee, never for me.
7th Amendment: Come and take it
Sydney Reid acquitted.

This was a case where someone filming was assaulted, and then arrested and charged with felony assault.

The grand jury no billed that, so they took her to trial on a misdemeanor charge. There were a bunch of discovery problems.

And now this.

Kudos to the FPDS!
A verdict form for Sydney Lori Reid. She was found Not Guilty.
Compromise: we give the PA precision munitions and guidance systems and in response we monitor to prevent use against civilians precisely as strict as we've monitored Israel's use.
"No one was firing rockets into their territory" sir may I introduce you to the Holy Moses
The Carthaginians, Delenda Est
It was really a criticism of Ben Gvir’s Doordash order
So when people were talking about hummus and falafel and schnitzel did you think they were talking about the culture of the state? Like what government officials are eating during state affairs?

Please tell me you get that’s not what’s going on here
And I promise no one saying this is talking about like, the Knesset. They mean Israel the country
Just to be clear here are you hinging specifically on the word “state” as distinct from “country” here because yes the Israeli state doesn’t have a culture the way Israel has a culture but it would be awfully pedantic of you to invoke that distinction here
One autist to another, I am telling you my sister, the allistics do not mean it the benign way. The world will be so much clearer to you when you see this. It will be like cleaning your glasses for the first time in a decade. See it with us.
I'm just assuming it's a southern bless your heart sort of thing
And I'm telling you, because this isn't really in dispute, that were this the case, a remark invoking racist tropes about black people and just subbing in the word "Americans" would be taken as extremely racist, and this would be a reasonable thing to do.
Apologies for not clarifying: I was asking that to see if you could consider hypotheticals. Since you can, I'm asking you to consider a hypothetical where, as is true in the real world vis a vis jews and Israel, black Americans were most Americans and were classically associated with America.
Like I'm sorry if it walks like a 4channer and it talks like a 4channer I'm not gonna extend the grace and presumption of good faith deserved by a human rights advocate and neither should you.
Oh wow so you CAN consider the implications of a hypothetical situation involving things that aren't true in the real world! I am so glad we've established that. Now that we have established that you can do that, please try to address the situation described above again.
Okay I need to figure something out bear with me here.

If you did not eat breakfast this morning, would you feel hungrier now?
Do you have any thoughts as to why people might be saying it so much if it's entirely unimportant? It's just a little thing that doesn't matter to anyone which is why they're so ardent about it and trying to make sure lots of people know they believe it. Like with anything unimportant. Sure.