Corey
@kh0rish.bsky.social
550 followers 350 following 4.8K posts
Biologist, just fed up at this point because *gestures everywhere*
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
kh0rish.bsky.social
kh0rish.bsky.social
So first, we gotta start digging into biochemistry, BUT, we have to treat biochemistry like the finite-state machinery that it is. And not the abstract mathematical concept, but the simple machines of physics (lever, pulley, screw, etc) to form active mechanisms like this lock:
An example of a simple mechanism that can be modeled by a state machine is a turnstile.[4][5] A turnstile, used to control access to subways and amusement park rides, is a gate with three rotating arms at waist height, one across the entryway. Initially the arms are locked, blocking the entry, preventing patrons from passing through. Depositing a coin or token in a slot on the turnstile unlocks the arms, allowing a single customer to push through. After the customer passes through, the arms are locked again until another coin is inserted.

Considered as a state machine, the turnstile has two possible states: Locked and Unlocked.[4] There are two possible inputs that affect its state: putting a coin in the slot (coin) and pushing the arm (push). In the locked state, pushing on the arm has no effect; no matter how many times the input push is given, it stays in the locked state. Putting a coin in – that is, giving the machine a coin input – shifts the state from Locked to Unlocked. In the unlocked state, putting additional coins in has no effect; that is, giving additional coin inputs does not change the state. A customer pushing through the arms gives a push input and resets the state to Locked.

The turnstile state machine can be represented by a state-transition table, showing for each possible state, the transitions between them (based upon the inputs given to the machine) and the outputs resulting from each input:

The turnstile state machine can also be represented by a directed graph called a state diagram (above). Each state is represented by a node (circle). Edges (arrows) show the transitions from one state to another. Each arrow is labeled with the input that triggers that transition. An input that doesn't cause a change of state (such as a coin input in the Unlocked state) is represented by a circular arrow returning to the original state. The arrow into the Locked node from the black dot indicates it is the initial state.
kh0rish.bsky.social
You dont build anything with a model of word proximity on the internet
kh0rish.bsky.social
Because the worst guys on earth arent using those to prop up a stupid gigantic bubble and over-produce datacenters that fuck up local communities and their power bills
Reposted by Corey
irisvanrooij.bsky.social
We know — from first principles — that LLMs can only create AI slop.

Why do people keep needing empirical tests?
irisvanrooij.bsky.social
The intractability proof (a.k.a. Ingenia theorem) implies that any attempts to scale up AI-by-Learning to situations of real-world, human-level complexity will consume an astronomical amount of resources (see Box 1 for an explanation). 13/n
Box 1 in the paper, intuitively explaining the implications of the intractability result.
kh0rish.bsky.social
Goddamn I love how much the WoW remix mechanics change the way casters play. Always moving with less than a second cast times. Pure shenanigans
kh0rish.bsky.social
These are truly the dumbest guys
Reposted by Corey
patmat.bsky.social
7/10 Computationalism treats information as if it were substance,and form as if it could feel.Consciousness can use mathematics,but it is not mathematics.It can express itself through patterns, numbers, and logic,just as it can through art, language, or biology,but
Reposted by Corey
patmat.bsky.social
6/10 If consciousness ever appeared in a machine, it would arise from the materials themselves, from their physical and energetic processes, not from the symbolic code that describes them. The confusion between matter and mathematics is the central illusion of computationalism:
kh0rish.bsky.social
Nah he fell in the sea and reverted
kh0rish.bsky.social
It me Im one of those more people
kh0rish.bsky.social
It is indeed sparking some joy
kh0rish.bsky.social
Ah hell. She has also been going through the boxes of childhood stuff her mom couldnt throw out, and dumped on us. She found one of those damn Presidential fitness tests in one. Guess what we are doing now….
kh0rish.bsky.social
High school friend of my wife is staying with us for a bit because she got a new job in the area, and they are having a TIME.
They have randomly decided that they are going to get better at splits/backbends and are in the middle of the living room groaning as they stretch ass-sat, middle aged limbs
kh0rish.bsky.social
Just limbs everywhere for the last 20 minutes Im dying
kh0rish.bsky.social
They are now in happy baby, legs in the air. Even the damn cat is on his back 😂. Love it
kh0rish.bsky.social
High school friend of my wife is staying with us for a bit because she got a new job in the area, and they are having a TIME.
They have randomly decided that they are going to get better at splits/backbends and are in the middle of the living room groaning as they stretch ass-sat, middle aged limbs
kh0rish.bsky.social
Great big gravitational pull of dumb shit. Not good
Reposted by Corey
velnna.bsky.social
"Oh yeah? They said the same thing about digital art when it became a thing" isn't a gotcha it's an admission that you're too stupid to tell the difference
kh0rish.bsky.social
No. Yall gotta stop making these superficial comparisons to biology they are not remotely similar
Reposted by Corey
vortexegg.com
It's not a war against truth with false information. It is a war _against information_, against the facticity of contingent existence, in place of the fascist imagination.
kh0rish.bsky.social
These two assessments go together. If you actually had what you imagine/assume a brain simulation is, you wouldnt need training data, it could just get to analyzing things immediately. It could CREATE models, not be one.
If you have to turn everything into data/math problems before the computer can even operate on it, how are you gonna make an autonomous AI “agent.” You havent come up with the algorithm that turns new encounters and aspects of reality into useable data/math problems. 

Cells dont have to do that btw Like…guys. Its not a mathematical model of the brain. Its a mathematical model of the dataset. The distribution of word proximity in it, to be precise.
Reposted by Corey
essaywells.bsky.social
It's so maddening that *there is literally a helpful diagram in the Attention... paper* showing that the LLM outputs are statistically plausible strings of words. What do the words say or mean? That's not part of the model.
kh0rish.bsky.social
I want more godzilla and kong movies with a lot of the monsters like in these later movies but framed/shot like 2014 damnit. Pacific Rim not Pacific Rim 2 you hear me!
kh0rish.bsky.social
The most narcissistic narcissist thing that ever narcissisted.
kh0rish.bsky.social
We should probably hammer this more often because its a huge source of the misunderstandings that fuel the outright nonsense going on.

Cant be an intelligent model or simulation when its not even an attempt at that in the first place.
kh0rish.bsky.social
Like…guys. Its not a mathematical model of the brain. Its a mathematical model of the dataset. The distribution of word proximity in it, to be precise.