Kathy Bowrey
@kathybowrey.bsky.social
520 followers 1.1K following 100 posts
Politics of IP, open knowledge, law & humanities, citizen science
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
“When it comes to responsible AI use, there are, at best, many conflicting positions. Equating responsibility with disclosing genAI use conceals, in fact, several fundamental questions concerning the responsibilities that academics have to their disciplines, each other, and society at large.”
Reposted by Kathy Bowrey
We are very pleased to announce the 2025/6 ISHTIP Online Seminar Series, which brings together scholars from around the world who explore intellectual property issues from theoretical and historical angles.

Please find below the programme, dates for your diary, registration links ⬇️
Reposted by Kathy Bowrey
The first in the seminar series is coming up next week.

You can register for a zoom link here👇

We look forward to seeing many of you online!
Reposted by Kathy Bowrey
'Drawing on...more than 3,000 researchers globally the Publishing Futures report, released on 16 October by Cambridge University Press, found 53 per cent of respondents believe AI would negatively impact the research publishing system while 18 per cent feel it would improve academic publishing.' 1/2
Low-quality and AI-generated papers ‘could overwhelm publishing’
Survey of more than 3,000 researchers by Cambridge University Press reveals widespread concerns over the rise of ChatGPT-assisted papers
www.timeshighereducation.com
How many commodities can you make from one academic article?
INNOVATIVE: "The AAS calculates article publication charges using an approach that counts “digital quanta”, units of information in digital form that the author supplies. Digital quanta can include words, figures, tables, data components, and figure set." journals.aas.org/article-char...
Article Publication Charges and Licensing Agreements - AAS Journals
journals.aas.org
The EDUC manual, Training the Algorithm, referred to in this post is excellent
The new Platform Work Directive gives workers the right to challenge automated decision-making, to peer inside the algorithms used, to speak to a responsible human about disputes, and to have their privacy and other fundamental rights protected on the job. www.eff.org/deeplinks/2...
What Europe’s New Gig Work Law Means for Unions and Technology
At EFF, we believe that tech rights are worker’s rights. Since the pandemic, workers of all kinds have been subjected to increasingly invasive forms of bossware. These are the “algorithmic
www.eff.org
Reposted by Kathy Bowrey
Music indies sound the alarm bells!! So called "attribution technology" will be nothing like the world of streaming or record sales where a successful artist can track their popularity. It will be a murky tech-metricocracy that will benefit those with the most compute.

www.ft.com/content/1a1a...
Music labels close to landmark AI licensing deals
Universal and Warner seek payment structure similar to streaming as more disruption looms
www.ft.com
“when the rhetoric stops short of articulating how and what is different about what we are seeing with the aid of computer vision and why it matters, then all we have are slogans in support of computer vision itself.”
Reposted by Kathy Bowrey
Todays best echidna… it’s a small juvenile that was scuttling about on the side of the road.
“Critics say automatic subscriptions to online course materials are a commercial cash grab that limits students’ choices”. Fun fact: In Australia students who can’t afford to rent, sometimes can’t use the library e-book in exams due to licence restrictions.
universityaffairs.ca/features/dig...
Digital textbook deals spark controversy - University Affairs
Critics say automatic subscriptions to online course materials are a commercial cash grab that limits students’ choices
universityaffairs.ca
Reposted by Kathy Bowrey
I mean, that quote seems to indicate that Clarivate has no agency in the embedding. These tools are being actively added to products by without the option of turning them off. Here's a thought. Maybe get the products right before releasing them like an untested virus into the scholarly environment?
MAYBE DON'T FORCE THEM ON US? "Yet, as these tools become embedded in scholarly workflows, the segment faces a complex challenge: how do we balance responsible AI use and the prevention of harmful outputs with the need to preserve academic freedom & research integrity?" clarivate.com/academia-gov...
Guardrails for Responsible AI
Clarivate on AI guardrails: balancing responsible AI, safety, and academic freedom through shared standards and community collaboration.
clarivate.com
Reposted by Kathy Bowrey
Reposted by Kathy Bowrey
MISERABLE GHOSTS - bloody university rankings follow everything around like a bad smell
“AI isn’t magic; it’s a pyramid scheme of human labor,” said Adio Dinika, a researcher at the Distributed AI Research Institute based in Bremen, Germany. “These raters are the middle rung: invisible, essential and expendable.”
www.theguardian.com/technology/2...
How thousands of ‘overworked, underpaid’ humans train Google’s AI to seem smart
Contracted AI raters describe grueling deadlines, poor pay and opacity around work to make chatbots intelligent
www.theguardian.com
Reposted by Kathy Bowrey
STATEMENT: Time to stop the undermining of library rights: IFLA statement on contract override www.ifla.org/news/time-to...
The Statement ... calls on governments to protect limitations and exceptions ... & look at how to ensure libraries benefit from effective protections against unfair contracts
Time to stop the undermining of library rights: IFLA statement on contract override
IFLA’s Governing Board has approved a new statement prepared by IFLA’s Advisory Committee on Copyright and other Legal Matters. This sets out the risk of licensing practices fo...
www.ifla.org
Reposted by Kathy Bowrey
My publisher let me know and you know what? Hell yeah.
Under U.S. law, a copyright owner may elect to recover an award of statutory damages in the amount of $750-30,000 ("as the court considers just") per infringed work.

If the infringement is willful, the court can award up to $150,000 in statutory damages per work.
What is becoming more common is T&Cs shifting liability downstream. Upstream parties may have litigation insurance. End users never do. Eg. Composer is party responsible
“An ad blocker installed in a browser, Springer maintained, infringed on its copyright by modifying that Web page program without permission”.
Hmm-modifying a copyright work needs permission? Let’s turn that around, when Springer produce AI generated versions of academic work.
Reposted by Kathy Bowrey
'Wiley executed a “landmark" $20 million AI licensing project with a large tech company that included content from other publishers and also struck a “strategic partnership with Anthropic to accelerate AI integration across scholarly research."'

Afraid this will only encourage them further.
Wiley Touts AI Strengths in First Quarter Report
The publisher said it had executed a “landmark AI licensing project with a large tech company” and struck a “strategic partnership with Anthropic” in the period, reported $29 million in AI licensing r...
www.publishersweekly.com