Giles Wilkes
@gilesyb.bsky.social
19K followers 1.2K following 4.2K posts
Former politico, comment writer, spread betting dealer, editor, now think tanker, consultant, former baker of overly dense loaves.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
gilesyb.bsky.social
Been pondering this answer, whether it's a purely semantic point or substantial.

The biggest one-off wealth tax achieved in a while was 1997 windfall, 0.5% of GDP. If we managed 4x that, and got £70bn, that might lower the deficit by ~£3bn ... That is peanuts, so I conclude: semantic
gilesyb.bsky.social
*bangs head on the desk until it bleeds**

A ONE OFF wealth tax cannot help the problem of a DEFICIT which is a RECURRING thing
www.thetimes.com/uk/politics/...

*my head not the desk
Reposted by Giles Wilkes
jamesdaustin.bsky.social
'Taxes may have to rise'

Yes, if you're spending billions on nationalisation (plus billions on infra and new power generation) while choosing to make utilities free at the point of use, I would think taxes would have to rise.

Particularly given the wider state of public finances.
gilesyb.bsky.social
My take isn't "name a great writer, you won't be able to find them writing about writers". It's more about what seems to have been their primary and enduring motivation, which is reaching outside of themselves and their own small lives. I guess.
gilesyb.bsky.social
I met him during his heyday when I honestly believe he was touting the idea of China being drawn into the UK regulatory orbit, post Brexit. Satire has seen nothing like it
Reposted by Giles Wilkes
jomichell.bsky.social
Interesting post. If this is indeed an award for method, then what's rewarded, in terms of theoretical method, is 'try and say something interesting while sticking to the accepted -- indeed required -- method of representative agent inter-temporal optimisation'.
undercoverhist.bsky.social
What does a Nobel Prize on ‘innovation-driven economic growth’ actually reward?

A historian’s perspective on how to deal with the Nobel frenzy

beatricecherrier.wordpress.com/2025/10/13/w...
gilesyb.bsky.social
"In 1950 no fewer than 805 cyclists were killed on the roads in Britain—ten times the number killed last year"
www.economist.com/internationa...
From The Economist

But note a slightly rising toll in The Netherlands
Forget EVs. Cycling is revolutionising transport
Pedal power is booming, spinning up a new culture war
www.economist.com
gilesyb.bsky.social
To savagely attack the self important writer who thinks what they are doing matters so much... I'm guessing obviously
gilesyb.bsky.social
Then I contend that writing was better before the existence of writers
gilesyb.bsky.social
But it really is about the events, not the writer's struggle as a writer to write the writing, while occasionally meeting someone in a cafe
gilesyb.bsky.social
Omg yes. "Write about what you know", what a reveal
gilesyb.bsky.social
And Bloom is far more interesting than Stephen
gilesyb.bsky.social
Well I think it marked a bad turn
Reposted by Giles Wilkes
olivermantell.bsky.social
It certainly avoids the classic flaw of “I, a uniquely sensitive individual, am a novelist. Behold my uniquely sensitive creation: a novelist (who is uniquely sensitive…)”.

I take Casaubon as Evans/Eliot roasting (a side of) herself…
gilesyb.bsky.social
I was worrying about precisely that, but she treated him harshly that I think she was trying to make my point
gilesyb.bsky.social
A late career indulgence
gilesyb.bsky.social
Honourable exception, granted
gilesyb.bsky.social
*ok Dante is an exception. And Joyce?

**I'm looking at you, Iris Murdoch
gilesyb.bsky.social
The really, really great writers hardly ever featured writers in their works. Dickens, Homer, Shakespeare, Tolstoy, Chaucer, etc*. The most tedious novelist is the one that imagines their way into the world of a novelist from Brooklyn or Oxford**
rachelfeder.bsky.social
Tell me your most unhinged literary opinion, as a little treat
gilesyb.bsky.social
Like "An essential condition today for entry into the upper echelons of Conservative party politics is being willing to at least pretend that you think taking Britain out of the EU was a good idea. This is a never-ending lobotomy for the Tories"
gilesyb.bsky.social
"One reason the successive Tory administrations from 2016 to 2024 achieved so little beyond damage control is that they traded middle-aged voters who needed little from the state for older voters who require rather more"
on.ft.com/4oi1TXq column full of brilliant insights by @stephenkb.bsky.social
How Brexit drained the Tories’ talent pool
The party can’t keep expecting successful people to pretend that leaving the EU was a good idea
on.ft.com
gilesyb.bsky.social
What does this do to bond yields
gilesyb.bsky.social
The best spads are hardly ever talking to media so the question of cliche is beside the point
Reposted by Giles Wilkes
dieworkwear.bsky.social
It's hard to help Americans left behind because so much of US identity is rooted in individualism. The average American conservative holds all three positions at once:

— Virtue signals about supporting US manufacturing
— Against raising the minimum wage
— Buys foreign imports because they're cheap
HardPass4 on Twitter tweets: "I'm willing to pay more for quality products if they are made in America, by Americans, who are paid a decent income." The tweet shows Norman Rockwell's "Freedom of Speech" painting, which is often used to show the tweeter is expressing a brave opinion. HardPass4 on Twitter tweets: "MINIMUM WAGE JOBS WERE NOT MEANT TO BE A CAREER. Why does no one understand this? Entry level jobs are STEPPING STONES to better jobs. No one wants to work towards that though." HardPass4 on Twitter tweets: "Buy $5 gloves instead of $50 ones. Trust me." The tweet shows a box of "Gorilla Grip" gloves. The label on Gorilla Grip gloves show they're made in China.