Gautham Rao
@gauthamrao.bsky.social
13K followers 1.9K following 7.5K posts
The historian, not the judge. #LFGM #LFC NYM-G-K-I. edit Law & History Review. my opinions. he/him/his. Book projects on (1) slavery + laws; (2) The West Wing.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
gauthamrao.bsky.social
Trump’s gonna nominate David Coote
gauthamrao.bsky.social
WankGPT seems logistically challenging
mattburgess1.bsky.social
Oh good, ChatGPT is getting "erotica for verified adults" later this year
We made ChatGPT pretty restrictive to make sure we were being careful with mental health issues. We realize this made it less useful/enjoyable to many users who had no mental health problems, but given the seriousness of the issue we wanted to get this right.

Now that we have been able to mitigate the serious mental health issues and have new tools, we are going to be able to safely relax the restrictions in most cases.

In a few weeks, we plan to put out a new version of ChatGPT that allows people to have a personality that behaves more like what people liked about 4o (we hope it will be better!). If you want your ChatGPT to respond in a very human-like way, or use a ton of emoji, or act like a friend, ChatGPT should do it (but only if you want it, not because we are usage-maxxing).

In December, as we roll out age-gating more fully and as part of our “treat adult users like adults” principle, we will allow even more, like erotica for verified adults.
gauthamrao.bsky.social
I once had to watch a lot of the good "Dr." to help a scholar with their research, and I'm very resentful
gauthamrao.bsky.social
I do my best in the Arendt seminar to keep things historical but it was categorical imperative day and, well...there were a lot of knowing glances...
gauthamrao.bsky.social
“You can't put feathers on a dog and call it a chicken!”
gauthamrao.bsky.social
"you teach people how to treat you”
urocklive1.bsky.social
Dr. Phil went full MAGA and tried to reinvent himself as a MAGA media mogul and culture warrior. Now his world is unraveling, his media company is laying off thousands and had to file for bankruptcy, and he's being sued for fraud. The whole plan is collapsing.

www.rawstory.com/dr-phil-trump/
Dr Phil faces 'total collapse' after MAGA alignment backfires massively: report
Dr. Phil McGraw's attempt to transition from daytime television personality to a politically aligned media mogul during Donald Trump's second presidential term has been marked by spectacular failure a...
www.rawstory.com
gauthamrao.bsky.social
High probability there's a regular White House meeting or chat dedicated to finding ways to kill brown people without consequences
gauthamrao.bsky.social
It was basically pain at the location of every injury I've ever accumulated
gauthamrao.bsky.social
thankfully I'm back to normal but it was a rough 36 hours
Reposted by Gautham Rao
mjsdc.bsky.social
Alito, joined by Thomas and Gorsuch, suggest that public schools violate the Constitution when they help a student transition (by acknowledging them as trans) without their parents' knowledge or consent.

Would force schools to out trans kids to their parents. www.supremecourt.gov/orders/court...
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
JONATHAN LEE, ET AL. v. POUDRE
SCHOOL DISTRICT R–1
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED
STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT
No. 25–89. Decided October 14, 2025
The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.
Statement of JUSTICE ALITO, with whom JUSTICE
THOMAS and JUSTICE GORSUCH join, respecting the denial
of certiorari.
I concur in the denial of certiorari because petitioners do
not challenge the ground for the ruling below. But I remain
concerned that some federal courts are “tempt[ed]” to avoid
confronting a “particularly contentious constitutional questio[n]”: whether a school district violates parents’ fundamental rights “when, without parental knowledge or consent, it encourages a student to transition to a new gender
or assists in that process.” Parents Protecting Our Children, UA v. Eau Claire Area School Dist., 604 U. S. ___,
___–___ (2024) (ALITO, J., dissenting from denial of certiorari) (slip op., at 1–2) (citing Troxel v. Granville, 530 U. S.
57, 70 (2000) (plurality opinion)). Petitioners tell us that
nearly 6,000 public schools have policies—as respondent allegedly does—that purposefully interfere with parents’ access to critical information about their children’s genderidentity choices and school personnel’s involvement in and
influence on those choices. Pet. for Cert. 24. The troubling—and tragic—allegations in this case underscore the
“great and growing national importance” of the question
that these parent petitioners present. Parents Protecting
Our Children, 604 U. S., at ___ (slip op., at 1).
gauthamrao.bsky.social
Putting aside the reality that it is gross for teachers or school officials to be examining students' sexuality or sexual identity, this is disgusting bullying.

I expect nothing less from this SCOTUS conservative majority.
mjsdc.bsky.social
Alito, joined by Thomas and Gorsuch, suggest that public schools violate the Constitution when they help a student transition (by acknowledging them as trans) without their parents' knowledge or consent.

Would force schools to out trans kids to their parents. www.supremecourt.gov/orders/court...
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES
JONATHAN LEE, ET AL. v. POUDRE
SCHOOL DISTRICT R–1
ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED
STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT
No. 25–89. Decided October 14, 2025
The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.
Statement of JUSTICE ALITO, with whom JUSTICE
THOMAS and JUSTICE GORSUCH join, respecting the denial
of certiorari.
I concur in the denial of certiorari because petitioners do
not challenge the ground for the ruling below. But I remain
concerned that some federal courts are “tempt[ed]” to avoid
confronting a “particularly contentious constitutional questio[n]”: whether a school district violates parents’ fundamental rights “when, without parental knowledge or consent, it encourages a student to transition to a new gender
or assists in that process.” Parents Protecting Our Children, UA v. Eau Claire Area School Dist., 604 U. S. ___,
___–___ (2024) (ALITO, J., dissenting from denial of certiorari) (slip op., at 1–2) (citing Troxel v. Granville, 530 U. S.
57, 70 (2000) (plurality opinion)). Petitioners tell us that
nearly 6,000 public schools have policies—as respondent allegedly does—that purposefully interfere with parents’ access to critical information about their children’s genderidentity choices and school personnel’s involvement in and
influence on those choices. Pet. for Cert. 24. The troubling—and tragic—allegations in this case underscore the
“great and growing national importance” of the question
that these parent petitioners present. Parents Protecting
Our Children, 604 U. S., at ___ (slip op., at 1).
gauthamrao.bsky.social
Excited to join Anne Twitty and Cynthia Nicoletti this week for a Roundtable on the Legal History of the Civil War Era at Ole Miss' Conference on the Civil War--keynote by @arielagross.bsky.social as well! Thanks to @rkdcolby86.bsky.social and April Holm for convening!

olemiss.edu/civil-war-re...
Conference on the Civil War | Ole Miss
The Center for Civil War Research and the History Department at the University of Mississippi invites attendees to the 2025 Conference on the Civil War.
olemiss.edu
gauthamrao.bsky.social
Important for politicians to communicate with their constituents
chrisgeidner.bsky.social
NEW: Barrett turns to Fox News, rather than the docket, to explain her silence in key rulings.

Justice Barrett wrote nothing in the racial profiling shadow docket ruling, but had something to say on Fox News Sunday.

Tonight, at Law Dork:
Barrett turns to Fox News, rather than the docket, to explain her silence in key rulings
Justice Barrett wrote nothing in the racial profiling shadow docket ruling, but had something to say on Fox News Sunday. And, for paid subscribers: Closing my tabs.
www.lawdork.com
Reposted by Gautham Rao
kevinkenny.bsky.social
Very much looking forward to discussing "Organizing Workers in the Shadow of Slavery" with @rbatzell.bsky.social, Lara Vapnek, Richard Price, and & Naomi R. Willians in @lawcha.bsky.social's 2025 Labor Book Big Forum, Friday, October 17, 2pm to 4pm ET online ⬇️⬇️⬇️
Registration details for Friday, October 17, 2pm to 4pm ET: https://umd.zoom.us/meeting/register/FCXIyoNuQf6R3AA-ymF2uA#/registration
Reposted by Gautham Rao
mjelmore.bsky.social
I am honored that “In the Shadow of the Law” has received the WHA’s Bolton-Cutter Award.

The article shows how one case illuminates the fragile border between law and humanity - a line we’re still redrawing.

Grateful for readers & colleagues who believe rigorous research & justice go together.
In the Shadow of the Law: The Hanigan Case and the Genesis of the Immigrant Rights Movement
One August afternoon in 1976, a group of men building a fence on a family ranch in Agua Prieta, Mexico, looked up to see a young man limping toward them. N
doi.org
gauthamrao.bsky.social
‘That’s a nice city you got there. Shame if something happened to it.’
notalawyer.bsky.social
the actual story here, which the media never talks about, is that police in this country have become a discrete right-wing political operation. the story isn't about cops leaving (they're lying about that), it's about the police trying to exert influence over elections.
misoshnik.bsky.social
Lmao is this supposed to be a bad thing?
gauthamrao.bsky.social
Got the Covid booster yesterday and they are not messin with this batch
gauthamrao.bsky.social
Sure we haven’t figured this out but we’ll take away your rights anyway.

One hell of a republic we’ve got here.
atrupar.com
Amy Coney Barrett defends heavy use of the shadow docket: "If we wrote a long opinion, it might give the impression that we have finally resolved the issue, and in none of these cases have we finally resolved the issue."
gauthamrao.bsky.social
dishonoring the memory of Angeball
gauthamrao.bsky.social
least excitement at the Tottenham stadium since Mourinho was manager
gauthamrao.bsky.social
this Jets-Broncos game not exactly an advert for the excitement of the nfl
gauthamrao.bsky.social
least excitement at the Tottenham stadium since Mourinho was manager
gauthamrao.bsky.social
this Jets-Broncos game not exactly an advert for the excitement of the nfl
gauthamrao.bsky.social
thankfully I had to run an errand
gauthamrao.bsky.social
this Jets-Broncos game not exactly an advert for the excitement of the nfl
gauthamrao.bsky.social
Reminds me of "why wasn't Obama in the Oval Office on 9/11?"

www.youtube.com/shorts/4v5Yo...