Charlie Thomas
@cthomasjamh.bsky.social
6.6K followers 800 following 3.2K posts
Professor, African Military Historian, Co-Editor of the Journal of African Military History. Opinions expressed are solely mine. My book, Ujamaa’s Army, is available now!! https://www.ohioswallow.com/9780821425596/ujamaas-army
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
cthomasjamh.bsky.social
For all my new followers, hello! I am a historian of African militaries and African military history- and I recently published a book on the Tanzania People's Defence Forces' fascinating history! Here's a thread about why you should read it! bsky.app/profile/ctho...
cthomasjamh.bsky.social
"But Charlie!" you may say, "why should *I* care about the Tanzania People's Defence Force!?" Well let me tell you a few cool things about them!

1. Following independence most African states just inherited whatever colonial troops existed as their militaries. This often led to coups and mutinies.
cthomasjamh.bsky.social
Whooooo! Although I know other folks have already gotten it, my author copies finally arrived. It's been a long road and it still feels unreal to actually have the physical copies in hand!
cthomasjamh.bsky.social
Jesus yes. For some reason they got the platform for all our trainings and certifications and the goddamn thing was so bad for the purpose. It didn’t help that they couldn’t even port over our transcripts so we had to just download our own backup.
Reposted by Charlie Thomas
golikehellmachine.com
i would not have predicted wanting to hear a new dancehall crashers record in [checks notes] 2025, but this sounds great
simmerdownprod.bsky.social
New music video featuring Karina Denike of The Dancehall Crashers, next Wednesday!
Reposted by Charlie Thomas
golikehellmachine.com
they’re callin’ it conkers, cap, it’s when the zoomers get all up on smashing the natural labubu, it’s sick
picture of ice t in SVU
cthomasjamh.bsky.social
So uh... think anyone at SASC or HASC is going to notice?
cthomasjamh.bsky.social
So for humorous group chat reasons I was looking this up and realized that this is what our legacy media was doing a full court press on at about the same time in Biden's presidency (11/4) as we are in the second Trump administration (10/14). It's a hell of a comparison. slate.com/business/202...
Yes, 12 Gallons a Week Is a Ton of Milk
Even if you have nine children and are the subject of an irresponsible segment on CNN.
slate.com
Reposted by Charlie Thomas
tznkai.bsky.social
Matt Levine remains the best media Matt
deus01.bsky.social
postmodern finance theory
cthomasjamh.bsky.social
I mean sure, but it isn't like he had a world leading Parkinson's specialist at the White House for an easily researchable reason!
Reposted by Charlie Thomas
peterlucier.bsky.social
So what’s left? Nothing lawful.
Paying salaries from RDT&E would be a purpose violation (wrong “color of money”) and an Antideficiency Act problem (spending without appropriation).

GAO and OMB guidance are clear: the CR’s transfer powers die when the CR dies.
Reposted by Charlie Thomas
pwhickey.bsky.social
Live look at DFAS staff as they clear the final accounts for this pay period and then start thinking about how to move “donor money” to cover the next pay period
cthomasjamh.bsky.social
No there is not. I mean, theoretically there wasn't this time either, so DFAS is probably on tilt at the moment already.
Reposted by Charlie Thomas
golikehellmachine.com
relatedly, the reason this is illegal is because it would make the military beholden to the highest bidder, which we absolutely do not want, even if you like the idea of draining billionaires for it. it will not take them long at all to start giving the orders if they’re paying.
golikehellmachine.com
it’s illegal, but, also, this didn’t happen, and if someone *did* tell him this, they were lying
atrupar.com
Trump: "I had a very wealthy person who called -- a donor, a great gentleman -- and he said, 'if there's any money necessary, shortfall, for the paying of the troops, then I will pay it.' Meaning he will pay it. How about that?"
cthomasjamh.bsky.social
Perhaps Grandpa can convince his Mystery Donor to kick in an extra $8bn a month to cover DoD civilians as well?
cthomasjamh.bsky.social
BlueSky Revolutionaries learn about the Civil Rights Campaign challenge: impossible.
Reposted by Charlie Thomas
lorenraeds.bsky.social
"I want government to prioritize ___ so that in 2050 …”

My summer in a nutshell, and the series of findings kicks off today. One fascinating thing: over a dozen radical reimaginings of the role and design of government had several pretty basic ingredients in common!

fas.org/initiative/r...
Reimagining How Government Works, a Short Series
As we approach the 250th anniversary of our Constitution, we can build momentum toward such reforms by creating opportunity reimagine what sort of government we want, and to what end.
fas.org
cthomasjamh.bsky.social
Right? Otoh we now have commanders telling their troops they’re gonna be taken care of through the shutdown but we’ve already blown the one dubiously legal method we had for one pay period and the only remaining methods mentioned are “Tariff Shelf” or “Mystery Donor.”
cthomasjamh.bsky.social
I mean, assuming this person was even real (lol) how would the money even get to DFAS to be distributed? You can’t just cut a check to the DoD and have the money dropped into the MILPERS pot.
cthomasjamh.bsky.social
So beyond the blatant illegality and impossibility of this, this would run about $15b a month. Even assuming a Musk or an Ellison, how long does said “great gentleman” feel obligated to cover the costs?
atrupar.com
Trump: "I had a very wealthy person who called -- a donor, a great gentleman -- and he said, 'if there's any money necessary, shortfall, for the paying of the troops, then I will pay it.' Meaning he will pay it. How about that?"
cthomasjamh.bsky.social
atrupar.com
Trump: "I had a very wealthy person who called -- a donor, a great gentleman -- and he said, 'if there's any money necessary, shortfall, for the paying of the troops, then I will pay it.' Meaning he will pay it. How about that?"
Reposted by Charlie Thomas
figgityfigs.bsky.social
There is no appropriated money to make up any shortfall in troop pay compared to if there were no shutdown and if troops get paid anyway it is a pure and clear violation of the constitution. Simple as.
atrupar.com
Trump: "I had a very wealthy person who called -- a donor, a great gentleman -- and he said, 'if there's any money necessary, shortfall, for the paying of the troops, then I will pay it.' Meaning he will pay it. How about that?"
Reposted by Charlie Thomas
Reposted by Charlie Thomas
noupside.bsky.social
I'm sorry, is the Trump Administration talking to a tech platform?

Is it...requesting content moderation?
Today following outreach from @thejusticedept, Facebook removed a large group page that was being used to dox and target @ICEgov agents in Chicago.
The wave of violence against ICE has been driven by online apps and social media campaigns designed to put ICE officers at risk just for doing their jobs. The Department of Justice will continue engaging tech companies to eliminate platforms where radicals can incite imminent violence against federal law enforcement.
cthomasjamh.bsky.social
I mean, the OOP then talked about building institutions and developing laws but that really rings hollow in an era where the opposition won an election and so is dismantling institutions and ignoring laws, you know?
Reposted by Charlie Thomas
qjurecic.bsky.social
Showing up to No Kings with a sign reading “monarchy is an affront to human dignity but, when incorporated into a liberal democratic system, may nevertheless be a useful safety valve for nationalist and/or authoritarian impulses” and then getting clobbered by a Buttigieg-supporting grandmother
mthrjo.bsky.social
Incidentally, I’ve been chafing a bit at the “No Kings” thing, because there are loads of monarchies that have more limits on executive power than the US does, but it has the great advantage that it makes Americans who want to oppose it sound, well, unamerican….
sjshancoxli.liberalcurrents.com
one of the reasons they're so mad at "no kings" is that they thought they were going to get a different kind of protest. they *want* the black bloc to be out there fighting with the cops. those are the images they've been trying to generate from "go." instead--

newrepublic.com/article/2016...
cthomasjamh.bsky.social
That was “provably” true, autocorrect.
cthomasjamh.bsky.social
Who wants any of this?
hypervisible.blacksky.app
“Customers’ current Walmart or Sam’s Club accounts will get automatically linked to ChatGPT. Goods will also be available from third-party sellers.” 🙃