“BOO”netteWreck 🎃
@brunettewreck.bsky.social
2K followers
1.7K following
7.4K posts
Puggles, cheeseburgers, and street art. Attorney. IP and reputation management. BrunetteWreck on Peloton.
You don’t need perfect conditions. You just need relentless action.
I have good bone density.
Posts
Media
Videos
Starter Packs
Reposted by “BOO”netteWreck 🎃
Reposted by “BOO”netteWreck 🎃
Reposted by “BOO”netteWreck 🎃
![For example, the plaintiff seeks to enforce the “LEBRON” word mark in a case where the defendant’s advertised and sold a pair of retro Jordans, which have nothing to do with the LEBRON mark. Case: 1:25-cv-03777 Document #: 37 Filed: 10/10/25 Page 1 of 4 PageID #:748
2
The plaintiff has since filed a supplement to address those concerns. The plaintiff argues that, “[t]here is no statute or Seventh Circuit decision requiring that permanent injunctions prohibiting trademark infringement and counterfeiting must be limited to the specific marks that a plaintiff caught a defendant infringing.” That is not true. “[A] plaintiff seeking a permanent injunction must satisfy a four-factor test before a court may grant such relief.](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:hvwhptk4oerwsuzau66ikwfy/bafkreiazcoio4uabb4aowjbdkxonkote3khrksxfglniw5xwxhn7q3hmwu@jpeg)
Reposted by “BOO”netteWreck 🎃
worried shoes
@worried.shoes
· 15h
Reposted by “BOO”netteWreck 🎃
