by Peter Tulip
by Peter Tulip
Reposted by Peter Tulip
Reposted by Peter Tulip
Reposted by Peter Tulip
Reposted by Peter Tulip
Reposted by Peter Tulip
Reposted by Peter Tulip
Reposted by Peter Tulip
Reposted by Peter Tulip
They directly increase housing costs for renters and homeowners, but the public benefit is far from clear. It's time to re-evaluate the trade-offs. 👇
Reposted by Peter Tulip
Reposted by Peter Tulip
I get the desire to prioritize residents over visitors in a housing emergency.
But shouldn’t the bigger long-term goal be more housing *and* more hotels? Rather than just managing scarcity?
Reposted by Peter Tulip
by Peter Tulip
by Peter Tulip
by Peter Tulip
by Peter Tulip
Reposted by Peter Tulip
by Peter Tulip
by Peter Tulip
by Peter Tulip
Reposted by Peter Tulip
by Peter Tulip
by Peter Tulip
Nevertheless, housing policy in Auckland led to a 28% reduction in rent, relative to other NZ cities.
It is foolish not to ask whether other cities around the globe might learn from that.
by Peter Tulip
And not just social housing. Something for the 96% of households who live in market housing.
by Peter Tulip
By Former UK Housing Secretary Sir Simon Clarke and NZ housing minister Chris Bishop.
Recommended.
www.express.co.uk/news/politic...
by Peter Tulip
by Peter Tulip — Reposted by Peter Tulip
by Peter Tulip
by Peter Tulip