Scholar

Kostas Kampourakis

H-index: 25
Philosophy 29%
Biology 23%

Reposted by Kostas Kampourakis

Reposted by Kostas Kampourakis

This is a lovely review of my (brief) history of alchemy by Kit Chapman. As Kit says, I wanted neither to duck the esoteric/spiritual aspects of the alchemical tradition & make it out to be *just* early chemistry, nor to over-emphasize those things as some books have.
www.nature.com/articles/d41...
Client Challenge
www.nature.com
In 2018, Charles Murray challenged me to a bet: "We will understand IQ genetically—I think most of the picture will have been filled in by 2025—there will still be blanks—but we’ll know basically what’s going on." It's now 2025, and I claim a win. I write about it in The Atlantic.
Your Genes Are Simply Not Enough to Explain How Smart You Are
Seven years ago, I took a bet with Charles Murray about whether we’d basically understand the genetics of intelligence by now.
www.theatlantic.com

Reposted by Kostas Kampourakis

All about why we get Mendel wrong and why it matters. Watch the video where I explain the issues, or read excepts from several book reviews.

kampourakis.com/how-we-get-m...

Reposted by Kostas Kampourakis

Reposted by Kostas Kampourakis

Reposted by Kostas Kampourakis

Reposted by Kostas Kampourakis

Reposted by Kostas Kampourakis

New Cambridge Element in the Philosophy of Biology series—fully #openaccess! @thomasreydon.bsky.social explores how evolutionary theory crosses over from biology into other fields, showing how these crossovers embody a broader style of reasoning: 'evolutionary thinking' bit.ly/48z3h36 #HPbio #evosky
Book cover of “The Scope of Evolutionary Thinking” by Thomas A. C. Reydon, in the Cambridge Elements: The Philosophy of Biology series. Against a black background, the title is surrounded by Ernst Haeckel’s illustrations of marine organisms—radial, symmetrical forms in vivid blues, oranges, reds, and greens.
Here is the Greek edition of my book Ancestry Reimagined. If you happen to be in Athens, Greece, on November 3, there will be a book discussion at the publisher's main bookstore. More info to come.

cup.gr/book/ethniki...

Reposted by Kostas Kampourakis

Reposted by Kostas Kampourakis

Reposted by Kostas Kampourakis

Why studies about reconstructing the past based on contemporary DNA makes me think of the streetlight effect

open.substack.com/pub/kostaska...
Interesting! (To say the least).
News in the history of molecular biology. The Science History Institute in Philadelphia has acquired a huge archive of correspondence and other scientific material from the pioneers of molecular biology (Franklin, Klug, Perutz, Delbrück etc, with items from Crick and Watson, too). 1/n
History of Molecular Biology Collection
This unparalleled collection includes Rosalind Franklin's historic 'Photo 51,' which revealed the double-helix structure of DNA.
www.sciencehistory.org
News in the history of molecular biology. The Science History Institute in Philadelphia has acquired a huge archive of correspondence and other scientific material from the pioneers of molecular biology (Franklin, Klug, Perutz, Delbrück etc, with items from Crick and Watson, too). 1/n
History of Molecular Biology Collection
This unparalleled collection includes Rosalind Franklin's historic 'Photo 51,' which revealed the double-helix structure of DNA.
www.sciencehistory.org
Check out my latest book Trusting Science, using the attached 30% discount code, and let me know what you think!
Excited to participate in this very interesting conference: zasb.unibas.ch/de/veranstal...

Reposted by Kostas Kampourakis

Some scientists also think that historians do not know enough about the science to write about its history, which of course is not the case for good historians. Same for philosophers.
For an individual on average, or the average individual perhaps, but not for any two specific individuals. It is one thing to made a mathematical calculation and another to make sense of it.

References

Fields & subjects

Updated 1m