Economists win Nobel for innovation

Scholar power: 56.0%

Story's scientific field profile

Economics 70%, Business 15%, History 10%, Political science 5%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Gernot Wagner	33%	32	56.0%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

63.0%

2.1 h

2

56.0%

Ranking score

0.587

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Gernot Wagner

@gwagner.com

Headline of today's @financialtimes.com Moral Money newsletter nails the lesson from the Econ Nobels:

"Why green growth needs more destruction"

Yup.

2 3

by Paulo Gala

92%

Scholar power: 92.4%

Story's scientific field profile

Economics 70%, Business 15%, History 10%, Political science 5%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Paulo Gala	77%	16	92.4%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

68.0%

17.3 h

6

92.4%

Ranking score

0.295

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

by Colin F. Camerer

87%

Scholar power: 87.6%

Story's scientific field profile

Economics 70%, Business 15%, History 10%, Political science 5%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Colin F. Camerer	27%	117	87.6%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

46.0%

2.0 h

1

87.6%

Ranking score

0.288

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Colin Camerer

@cfcamerer.bsky.social

All of this reporting on the Nobel Peace Prize is thoroughly misguided noise. The Nobel process is impervious to lobbying. In Trump’s case it would clearly not help and likely backfire

The Tennessee Holler @thetnholler.bsky.social · 1d

Just now— @SpeakerJohnson announces he will lead a global pressure campaign to get the narcissist-in-chief a Nobel Prize next year

(Also revealing he doesn’t understand what “objective facts” are)

2

by Mika Maliranta

95%

Scholar power: 95.7%

Story's scientific field profile

Economics 70%, Business 15%, History 10%, Political science 5%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Mika Maliranta	68%	22	95.7%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

67.0%

10.1 h

0

95.7%

Ranking score

0.262

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Mika Maliranta

@maliranta.bsky.social

Nobelin muistopalkinto taloustieteelle annettiin juuri tutkimukselle, jossa tätä asiaa selvitetään. Tuossa kirjoituksessa yritän lyhyesti avata tuon kirjallisuuden sisältöä www.taloustieteellinenyhdistys.fi/wp-content/u...

www.taloustieteellinenyhdistys.fi

1

by Niclas Berggren

39%

Scholar power: 39.7%

Story's scientific field profile

Economics 70%, Business 15%, History 10%, Political science 5%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Niclas Berggren	25%	28	39.7%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

64.0%

3.6 h

2

39.7%

Ranking score

0.255

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Reposted by Helmut Reisen

38%

Scholar power: 38.5%

Story's scientific field profile

Economics 70%, Business 15%, History 10%, Political science 5%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Helmut Reisen	68%	32	38.5%

Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

66.0%

19.4 h

83

38.5%

Ranking score

0.24

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

by David K. Evans

22%

Scholar power: 22.2%

Story's scientific field profile

Economics 70%, Business 15%, History 10%, Political science 5%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 David K. Evans	12%	38	22.2%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

46.0%

0.8 h

0

22.2%

Ranking score

0.21

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

David Evans

@daveevansphd.bsky.social

Michael Kremer at @CGDev today speaking about social innovation funds.

You can watch the talk www.youtube.com/watch?v=P8q5...

or read an older version of the analysis he presented bpb-us-w2.wpmucdn.com/voices.uchic...

1

by Pierre‐Olivier Gourinchas

190%

Scholar power: 190.7%

Story's scientific field profile

Economics 70%, Business 15%, History 10%, Political science 5%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Pierre‐Olivier Gourinchas	89%	51	190.7%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

64.0%

23.3 h

6

190.7%

Ranking score

0.207

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

by Gernot Wagner

56%

Scholar power: 56.0%

Story's scientific field profile

Economics 70%, Business 15%, History 10%, Political science 5%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Gernot Wagner	33%	32	56.0%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

57.0%

4.0 h

2

56.0%

Ranking score

0.207

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

View post

by Monika Schnitzer

90%

Scholar power: 90.5%

Story's scientific field profile

Economics 70%, Business 15%, History 10%, Political science 5%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Monika Schnitzer	56%	29	90.5%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

75.0%

18.6 h

5

90.5%

Ranking score

0.201

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Monika Schnitzer

@monika-schnitzer.com

Congrats to the 2025 Nobel laureates in Economics, Philippe Aghion, Peter Howitt & Joel Mokyr!
Their work shows that innovation and technological change are essential for sustaining long-term growth. Insights we should take very seriously, now more than ever.

11

Reposted by Helmut Reisen

38%

Scholar power: 38.5%

Story's scientific field profile

Economics 70%, Business 15%, History 10%, Political science 5%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Helmut Reisen	68%	32	38.5%

Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

69.0%

7.6 h

2

38.5%

Ranking score

0.198

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Irwin (Bud) Collier

@irwincollier.bsky.social

#EconSky With "creative destruction" back in fashion, Economics in the Rear-view Mirror offers a glance at advanced economic theory taught at Harvard in 1948-49 by Joseph Schumpeter. His course reading lists included nine future Nobel laureates. www.irwincollier.com/harvard-adva...

1 2 5

Reposted by Kimberly A. Clausing, Aaron Sojourner, Miles Corak

50%

Scholar power: 50.6%

Story's scientific field profile

Economics 70%, Business 15%, History 10%, Political science 5%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Kimberly A. Clausing	49%	24	24.0%
🎓 Aaron Sojourner	30%	23	14.4%
🎓 Miles Corak	22%	31	12.2%
Total			50.6%

Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

54.0%

18.6 h

71

50.6%

Ranking score

0.174

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Catherine Rampell

@crampell.bsky.social

5 Immigrants To America Won 2024 And 2025 Nobel Prize In Economics www.forbes.com/sites/stuart...

5 Immigrants To America Won 2024 And 2025 Nobel Prize In Economics

Five immigrants to America have been awarded the Nobel prize in economics in 2024 and 2025; four of the five former international students.

www.forbes.com

12 71 240

by Monika Schnitzer

90%

Scholar power: 90.5%

Story's scientific field profile

Economics 70%, Business 15%, History 10%, Political science 5%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Monika Schnitzer	56%	29	90.5%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

74.0%

18.6 h

7

90.5%

Ranking score

0.193

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

by International Monetary Fund

140%

Scholar power: 140.0%

Story's scientific field profile

Economics 70%, Business 15%, History 10%, Political science 5%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 International Monetary Fund	66%	50	140.0%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

46.0%

23.0 h

26

140.0%

Ranking score

0.113

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

by Mika Maliranta

95%

Scholar power: 95.7%

Story's scientific field profile

Economics 70%, Business 15%, History 10%, Political science 5%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Mika Maliranta	68%	22	95.7%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

52.0%

22.9 h

8

95.7%

Ranking score

0.1

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

by Matías Vernengo

101%

Scholar power: 101.8%

Story's scientific field profile

Economics 70%, Business 15%, History 10%, Political science 5%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Matías Vernengo	80%	18	101.8%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

56.0%

18.5 h

3

101.8%

Ranking score

0.095

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

by Fabián Muniesa

73%

Scholar power: 73.5%

Story's scientific field profile

Economics 70%, Business 15%, History 10%, Political science 5%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Fabián Muniesa	42%	34	73.5%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

51.0%

22.3 h

0

73.5%

Ranking score

0.043

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

AKA Fa͍ͥ͒ͦͣ͑bi̗̼̣̦̳̊͐̏͊̇aͭn̜͕̜̠̼ͤ̐̏ Munié̼͙̭͉̫̌ͤ̑̓s͚͔̩̓̆a

@provokedeconomy.bsky.social

¡Trampas!

EL PAÍS Ciencia y Tecnología @elpaiscyt.bsky.social · 5d

Los Nobel de 2025 celebran la ciencia que no avanza por acumulación, sino por imaginación

Frente a un mundo que simplifica lo complejo, los ganadores nos recuerdan que el conocimiento verdadero nace de la creatividad, de las grietas en lo que sabemos y de la cooperación

elpais.com/ciencia/2025...

Los Nobel de 2025 celebran la ciencia que no avanza por acumulación, sino por imaginación

Frente a un mundo que tiende a simplificar lo complejo, los galardonados nos recuerdan que el conocimiento verdadero nace de la creatividad, de las grietas del conocimiento y de la cooperación

elpais.com

Reposted by Steve Keen

40%

Scholar power: 40.4%

Story's scientific field profile

Economics 70%, Business 15%, History 10%, Political science 5%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Steve Keen	75%	29	40.4%

Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

63.0%

23.9 h

1

40.4%

Ranking score

0.042

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

by Prokla Redaktion

2%

Scholar power: 2.9%

Story's scientific field profile

Economics 70%, Business 15%, History 10%, Political science 5%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Prokla Redaktion	4%	6	2.9%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

81.0%

7.0 h

4

2.9%

Ranking score

0.035

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Ingo Stützle

@istuetzle.bsky.social

Der Nicht- #Nobelpreis für #Wirtschaftswissenschaften ging dieses Jahr mitunter an Philippe #Aghion und Peter #Howitt »for the theory of sustained growth through creative destruction«.
1/4

2 2 5

by Ferdinando Boero

11%

Scholar power: 11%

Story's scientific field profile

Economics 70%, Business 15%, History 10%, Political science 5%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Ferdinando Boero	-	57	-