Such an interesting talk, thanks for sharing.

I feel seen.

It begs the question, what did she think PHON stands for?

I don’t think (unfortunately) it will play much part, whether people see it for its mirage or as a viable alternative. Even the people with big systems already on their roofs.

To gain the most impact, you should submit the article to the journal with the highest ‘Impact Factor’
❌ To gain the most impact, you should submit to the (reputable) journal whose readership is most likely to be stimulated by your findings

‘Person’ doing a lot of heavy lifting here.

We suggest the misperceptions of the highly concerned are due in part to attending to the politics of the issue, which is highly polarised. But the electorate is not. We advocate emphasising the unity that exists for strong climate action. End/

Climate concern was strongly related to perceived political polarisation, and this held withing voting groups. If you were a concerned Greens voter, you perceived strong group differences; if you were a less concerned Greens voter, perceptions of group differences were muted. 9/