Zach Allaun
@zachallaun.com
Mechanical keyboard maker at Keycult, #ElixirLang enjoyer. Living in Raleigh, NC.
Assuming GitHub, if the squashed commit links to the PR, that incremental history is still easily accessible to someone who wants to understand how a change came about. For someone just keeping up with a project, one commit per feature on main is much friendlier.
November 27, 2024 at 2:54 PM
Assuming GitHub, if the squashed commit links to the PR, that incremental history is still easily accessible to someone who wants to understand how a change came about. For someone just keeping up with a project, one commit per feature on main is much friendlier.
How does it feel if it has a small background on top of the text, but the whole button only appears if you're hovering the code element?
November 23, 2024 at 4:22 PM
How does it feel if it has a small background on top of the text, but the whole button only appears if you're hovering the code element?
For sure! I've been thinking a bit about possible terminal APIs that gracefully degrade when raw mode isn't available, but are nice and snappy when it is. I don't want to have to wait for broad OTP 28 usage!
November 21, 2024 at 12:33 AM
For sure! I've been thinking a bit about possible terminal APIs that gracefully degrade when raw mode isn't available, but are nice and snappy when it is. I don't want to have to wait for broad OTP 28 usage!
Makes sense. My inclination would be to vendor it in, but perhaps that's solving a problem that isn't really there if everyone using LVN in anger is fine using OTP 27 anyways.
November 15, 2024 at 10:53 PM
Makes sense. My inclination would be to vendor it in, but perhaps that's solving a problem that isn't really there if everyone using LVN in anger is fine using OTP 27 anyways.
Would it be feasible to vendor in :json as :lvn_json (or whatever)?
November 15, 2024 at 10:26 PM
Would it be feasible to vendor in :json as :lvn_json (or whatever)?
Gifs don't work, but video does!
November 14, 2024 at 6:37 PM
Gifs don't work, but video does!
I... uh... I think Bluesky might not support gifs...?
November 14, 2024 at 6:34 PM
I... uh... I think Bluesky might not support gifs...?
Let's try it one more time...
November 14, 2024 at 6:31 PM
Let's try it one more time...
Bluesky question... ^ this is supposed to be a gif, but it's just a static thumbnail for me. Does it play for anyone else?
November 14, 2024 at 6:29 PM
Bluesky question... ^ this is supposed to be a gif, but it's just a static thumbnail for me. Does it play for anyone else?
What is this... outside... you speak of...
November 8, 2024 at 11:38 PM
What is this... outside... you speak of...
Agreed, been my go-to for the last couple months.
November 8, 2024 at 11:28 PM
Agreed, been my go-to for the last couple months.
Out of curiosity, do you think it's the `dynamic(...)` or the `false or {term(), binary()}` part that's difficult to grok?
I ask because I wonder if they will become simpler to understand as inference improves and we see fewer dynamic types.
I ask because I wonder if they will become simpler to understand as inference improves and we see fewer dynamic types.
November 8, 2024 at 7:36 PM
Out of curiosity, do you think it's the `dynamic(...)` or the `false or {term(), binary()}` part that's difficult to grok?
I ask because I wonder if they will become simpler to understand as inference improves and we see fewer dynamic types.
I ask because I wonder if they will become simpler to understand as inference improves and we see fewer dynamic types.
I wonder if you could stick "restore to a reasonable default" ANSI codes at the front of your prompt to ensure things are always in an expected state after running a command!
November 8, 2024 at 1:14 AM
I wonder if you could stick "restore to a reasonable default" ANSI codes at the front of your prompt to ensure things are always in an expected state after running a command!
Yep, I'm going to just let today suck. Can work on myself and my reaction to all this tomorrow.
November 6, 2024 at 9:32 PM
Yep, I'm going to just let today suck. Can work on myself and my reaction to all this tomorrow.
Agreed! This would also address what I perceive to be the biggest complaint about Phoenix docs: not knowing which package to search for docs in. While I really appreciate AshHQ pulling everything together, I've occasionally wished it were just hexdocs because it's so familiar at this point!
August 2, 2023 at 11:59 AM
Agreed! This would also address what I perceive to be the biggest complaint about Phoenix docs: not knowing which package to search for docs in. While I really appreciate AshHQ pulling everything together, I've occasionally wished it were just hexdocs because it's so familiar at this point!