And even then, we already know that people will wilfully ignore their and their family’s ancestry to further their political ambitions. I suspect we have learned nothing of any academic value from this project.

While there _might_ be some value in using these tools to answer specific questions, maybe such as to verify his ancestry, there is absolutely no value in a tabloid style National Enquirer type “exposé”.

I saw this on LinkedIn yesterday in support of GAMs.

Speed 3

haha. oh, sorry. I can make it worse... ive recently gone over to native pipe |> over maggritr %>% too...

“Milibandwidth” : the smallest amount of attention someone will pay to be of their ideas

It suggests early ankylosaur armour could have been used to show off to mates, like a peacock's tail feathers.

Later ankylosaurs might have moved to more functional armour as more advanced predators evolved.

Discover what else this amazing ankylosaur reveals 👇 (4/4)
www.nhm.ac.uk/discover/new...