People should always assume the worst of D leaders not only *until* proven otherwise, but even *if* proven otherwise. They have already transgressed so beyond what’d be remotely acceptable that the grassroots has an imperative to slander them so thoroughly that they can never show their face again.

When it comes to politics, yes you do.

Lmfao “r/Kitchencels” sometimes I wish I wasn’t banned from Reddit

God forbid anyone be slightly unfair to Hakeem Jeffries and Chuck Schumer. Those two have really proven they can be counted on to do the right thing

… conservatives. For what reason? Why would D leadership be so willingly complicit in a conservative regime - only offering nominal resistance - if they aren’t actually in favor of it?

If it walks like a duck and talks like a duck it’s probably a conservative.

If they were real liberals they would be *acting* differently rn. It really is that simple. No real liberal can look at what’s happening and not be motivated to more action than they have displayed.

What you are proposing is that D leadership are indeed liberals who are just *acting* like…

I don’t understand how you could possibly be able to climb to the rank of Senator without 1) a little honest liberal conviction against this stuff or at least 2) a smidgen of cynical work ethic. How did we end up with these fucking useless traitors as party leaders?

My ex-boyfriend hated Trump obviously, but he always really liked Melania mostly because it’s pretty well known that she has a lot of friends in the ritzy gay fashion world in Manhattan and that was a major factor in his approval/disapproval of her.

I do. I hand out the True Liberal Certificates, was that not fucking clear?

Voters keep electing these conservative politicians as Democrats because they lie to their liberal voters and say that they are liberals too. It’s really not complicated. They are liars.