Xinkai Du
banner
xinkaidu.bsky.social
Xinkai Du
@xinkaidu.bsky.social
PhD in PsychMethods & ClinicalPsych with @sverreuj @SachaEpskamp | Prev @UvAmsterdam @UWaterloo | Psychometrics; (Intensive) Longitudinal Data; Applied Statistics
June 26, 2025 at 8:11 AM
The method works both for panel and n=1 data. By enabling researchers to statistically compare networks across groups/individuals, we hope the method opens new avenues for testing genetic influences, developmental theories, treatment mechanisms, and cross-cultural differences.
May 26, 2025 at 12:17 PM
I planned to present this method at #SAA2025. Unfortunately I could not make it due to an unforeseen cold. Hope you enjoy the discussion and stay safe and healthy!
May 26, 2025 at 11:08 AM
The paper also comes with a brief tutorial on the usage of the package
May 26, 2025 at 11:08 AM
We have implemented IVPP in an R package under the same name: github.com/xinkaidupsy/...
GitHub - xinkaidupsy/IVPP
Contribute to xinkaidupsy/IVPP development by creating an account on GitHub.
github.com
May 26, 2025 at 11:08 AM
Second, the method allows the comparison of networks when only a few data points (t = 3 or more) are available per person, a situation that is very common in large-scale longitudinal surveys.
May 26, 2025 at 11:08 AM
In contrast, IVPP uncovers edge-level differences through a novel algorithm we present, termed partial pruning, directly constructing the distinct networks of each group/individual. We believe it provides a more meaningful network difference test that reveals the mechanisms underlying heterogeneity.
May 26, 2025 at 11:08 AM
IVPP fills in two essential gaps in the literature: First, previous approaches to comparing dynamical networks unfortunately only report the presence/absence of heterogeneity, and are only viable when intensive measurements are available.
May 26, 2025 at 11:08 AM
Thank the collaborators for the continuous support and contribution! @noraskjerdingstad.bsky.social @renefreichel.bsky.social @omidvebrahimi.bsky.social Ria Hoekstra @sachaepskamp.bsky.social
February 7, 2025 at 6:46 AM
The Shiny app allows users to view the results interactively, as well as checking the rejection rates of different cutoff values they choose by themselves
February 7, 2025 at 6:46 AM
2. Fit indices were sensitive to mis-defined confirmatory network structures and non-stationarity.
3. Conventional cutoffs were convenient assessment criteria and generally performed well, albeit stricter cutoffs might be needed for hypothesis testing and replication studies
February 7, 2025 at 6:46 AM
1. Although most network studies are exploratory so far, confirmatory network analysis has been entirely feasible. It is also often neglected that in longitudinal settings, exploratory network models are in-fact semi-confirmatory for the stationarity assumption they rely on.
February 7, 2025 at 6:46 AM