William Stacey White
@wswhite9598.bsky.social
Dad, lawyer, grumpy old man
-in-training.
Duke, Illinois, Man City, Red Sox, Brewers.
Northern Chicago Burbs
-in-training.
Duke, Illinois, Man City, Red Sox, Brewers.
Northern Chicago Burbs
So you can cross the Big 12 off all the unrealistic “ND finds someone else to let them half join a conference” theories spinning since Sunday.
(Their real beef is with the SEC and Bama, but they aren’t going to take them on….)
(Their real beef is with the SEC and Bama, but they aren’t going to take them on….)
December 10, 2025 at 12:36 AM
So you can cross the Big 12 off all the unrealistic “ND finds someone else to let them half join a conference” theories spinning since Sunday.
(Their real beef is with the SEC and Bama, but they aren’t going to take them on….)
(Their real beef is with the SEC and Bama, but they aren’t going to take them on….)
Pete Bevaqua needs to consult Webster's.
December 9, 2025 at 5:59 PM
Pete Bevaqua needs to consult Webster's.
Kavanaugh has is history wrong, to the suprise of absolutely no one.
December 8, 2025 at 5:30 PM
Kavanaugh has is history wrong, to the suprise of absolutely no one.
The window was so tight. Well covered.
Add in the down, time and score, and it’s a odd choice to ask of Caleb (who had been really good) there
Add in the down, time and score, and it’s a odd choice to ask of Caleb (who had been really good) there
December 8, 2025 at 12:42 AM
The window was so tight. Well covered.
Add in the down, time and score, and it’s a odd choice to ask of Caleb (who had been really good) there
Add in the down, time and score, and it’s a odd choice to ask of Caleb (who had been really good) there
Ben too. Bad play call
December 8, 2025 at 12:36 AM
Ben too. Bad play call
It was a duck that was pretty badly underthrown and late.
But the Bears D is just that bad
But the Bears D is just that bad
December 7, 2025 at 10:55 PM
It was a duck that was pretty badly underthrown and late.
But the Bears D is just that bad
But the Bears D is just that bad
Well, if ND was subject to the tiebreaker, they’d have had four losers, two non-con, two conference, and their playoff access wouldn’t have been much of a worry.
December 7, 2025 at 10:51 PM
Well, if ND was subject to the tiebreaker, they’d have had four losers, two non-con, two conference, and their playoff access wouldn’t have been much of a worry.
Notre Dame would have been playing last night and likely won their way into the field.
They could just change their name to Alabama, since nothing really matters for them. Might be easier
They could just change their name to Alabama, since nothing really matters for them. Might be easier
December 7, 2025 at 10:20 PM
Notre Dame would have been playing last night and likely won their way into the field.
They could just change their name to Alabama, since nothing really matters for them. Might be easier
They could just change their name to Alabama, since nothing really matters for them. Might be easier
Waste of a challenge
December 7, 2025 at 9:43 PM
Waste of a challenge
Because the committee are morons and ten guys in a sports bar would do a better job than these clowns
December 7, 2025 at 5:36 PM
Because the committee are morons and ten guys in a sports bar would do a better job than these clowns
Herby and Marty hitting the talking points hard.
Not exactly impartial journalism
Not exactly impartial journalism
December 7, 2025 at 5:19 PM
Herby and Marty hitting the talking points hard.
Not exactly impartial journalism
Not exactly impartial journalism
If Duke gets left out, clearly conference championship games don’t matter.
See how that works?
See how that works?
December 7, 2025 at 4:11 AM
If Duke gets left out, clearly conference championship games don’t matter.
See how that works?
See how that works?
I’m pretending that wins and losses matter for everyone. Not just everyone but except the SEC
December 7, 2025 at 3:36 AM
I’m pretending that wins and losses matter for everyone. Not just everyone but except the SEC
Nicole’s good at her job.
But she’s as much PR for the SEC when it comes to this particular stuff as she is a journalist.
I doubt she’d have phrased her Skeet in the same way if it was just BYU that would be raising this argument.
But she’s as much PR for the SEC when it comes to this particular stuff as she is a journalist.
I doubt she’d have phrased her Skeet in the same way if it was just BYU that would be raising this argument.
December 7, 2025 at 3:17 AM
Nicole’s good at her job.
But she’s as much PR for the SEC when it comes to this particular stuff as she is a journalist.
I doubt she’d have phrased her Skeet in the same way if it was just BYU that would be raising this argument.
But she’s as much PR for the SEC when it comes to this particular stuff as she is a journalist.
I doubt she’d have phrased her Skeet in the same way if it was just BYU that would be raising this argument.
No one is in.
December 7, 2025 at 3:15 AM
No one is in.
And if these games matter, Duke’s in the CFP if they win, right?
December 7, 2025 at 3:12 AM
And if these games matter, Duke’s in the CFP if they win, right?
Nicole wasn’t.
December 7, 2025 at 3:11 AM
Nicole wasn’t.
So UVa and BYU are in. Great.
December 7, 2025 at 3:04 AM
So UVa and BYU are in. Great.
Did you get a picture of Alexi’s kneepads?
December 6, 2025 at 5:26 PM
Did you get a picture of Alexi’s kneepads?
Gotta keep the Cowboys in the conversation!
December 5, 2025 at 2:28 AM
Gotta keep the Cowboys in the conversation!
Khamenia and Harris can’t be on the floor together
December 3, 2025 at 2:19 AM
Khamenia and Harris can’t be on the floor together
Unable or unwilling? Both?
(Not sure that it matters either, but IMO Trump is both increasingly feeble *and* lazy.)
(Not sure that it matters either, but IMO Trump is both increasingly feeble *and* lazy.)
December 1, 2025 at 5:39 PM
Unable or unwilling? Both?
(Not sure that it matters either, but IMO Trump is both increasingly feeble *and* lazy.)
(Not sure that it matters either, but IMO Trump is both increasingly feeble *and* lazy.)
You seem incapable or uninterested in considering motivation when analyzing conservative thoughts/arguments/actions.
Want to avoid engagement like this (which I kind of doubt, actually)? Show some understanding or consideration for the what are often bad faith motives on the right.
Want to avoid engagement like this (which I kind of doubt, actually)? Show some understanding or consideration for the what are often bad faith motives on the right.
December 1, 2025 at 5:36 PM
You seem incapable or uninterested in considering motivation when analyzing conservative thoughts/arguments/actions.
Want to avoid engagement like this (which I kind of doubt, actually)? Show some understanding or consideration for the what are often bad faith motives on the right.
Want to avoid engagement like this (which I kind of doubt, actually)? Show some understanding or consideration for the what are often bad faith motives on the right.