TFW when you want to avoid seeming like a Nazi, but still sound like a Nazi anyway.
December 3, 2025 at 12:39 PM
TFW when you want to avoid seeming like a Nazi, but still sound like a Nazi anyway.
Reposted
Every fucking time. Republicans break the country. Democrats have to fix it, voters blame Democrats for not fixing it fast enough, rinse and repeat for my whole goddam life
December 3, 2025 at 3:38 AM
Every fucking time. Republicans break the country. Democrats have to fix it, voters blame Democrats for not fixing it fast enough, rinse and repeat for my whole goddam life
www.newsweek.com/billionaires...
According to this article, Mamdani actually did have some pretty big donors. Regardless, my point was that there’s a big difference between running mayor of NYC and President of the United States.
According to this article, Mamdani actually did have some pretty big donors. Regardless, my point was that there’s a big difference between running mayor of NYC and President of the United States.
These are the billionaires who donated to Zohran Mamdani's campaign
Two billionaires donated to New Yorkers For Lower Costs, an independent group backing Zohran Mamdani’s campaign.
www.newsweek.com
December 3, 2025 at 3:32 AM
www.newsweek.com/billionaires...
According to this article, Mamdani actually did have some pretty big donors. Regardless, my point was that there’s a big difference between running mayor of NYC and President of the United States.
According to this article, Mamdani actually did have some pretty big donors. Regardless, my point was that there’s a big difference between running mayor of NYC and President of the United States.
Mamdani ran in one of the bluest cities in America and his main opponent was disgraced former governor who no one likes. It’s hardly an apples to apples comparison.
December 3, 2025 at 2:53 AM
Mamdani ran in one of the bluest cities in America and his main opponent was disgraced former governor who no one likes. It’s hardly an apples to apples comparison.
I just realized there was a typo. I meant to say convict, not convinced.
December 3, 2025 at 2:23 AM
I just realized there was a typo. I meant to say convict, not convinced.
Dems are the only viable alternative to Republicans. That’s why you should vote for them.
December 3, 2025 at 2:22 AM
Dems are the only viable alternative to Republicans. That’s why you should vote for them.
He was impeached twice. Republicans were the ones who decided not to convince him.
December 3, 2025 at 12:52 AM
He was impeached twice. Republicans were the ones who decided not to convince him.
He was allowed to run again because the Supreme Court decided he was above the law.
December 3, 2025 at 12:48 AM
He was allowed to run again because the Supreme Court decided he was above the law.
I wasn’t trying to pick a fight. I didn’t actively seek out your post. I typed something in the search bar and spotted a comment that caught my attention and i decided to respond to it. For what it’s worth, I sincerely regret having done so now.
December 2, 2025 at 11:17 PM
I wasn’t trying to pick a fight. I didn’t actively seek out your post. I typed something in the search bar and spotted a comment that caught my attention and i decided to respond to it. For what it’s worth, I sincerely regret having done so now.
I don’t recall ever claiming to be “asking questions”. I offered my two cents on what i assumed was a discussion that was open to the public and then you proceeded to insult me and accuse me of being mentally ill.
December 2, 2025 at 10:43 PM
I don’t recall ever claiming to be “asking questions”. I offered my two cents on what i assumed was a discussion that was open to the public and then you proceeded to insult me and accuse me of being mentally ill.
This isn’t a park. I’m not walking up to two strangers to butt in on their conversation. You made a post that seemingly anyone was free to respond to. If it was off-limits for me get involved, I wasn’t aware of that.
December 2, 2025 at 10:41 PM
This isn’t a park. I’m not walking up to two strangers to butt in on their conversation. You made a post that seemingly anyone was free to respond to. If it was off-limits for me get involved, I wasn’t aware of that.
?
This is a public social media app.
This is a public social media app.
December 2, 2025 at 10:11 PM
?
This is a public social media app.
This is a public social media app.
I wasn’t trying to “pick a fight”. I typed his name out of a mix of boredom and curiosity and happened to notice your comment. The vast majority of my activity here has nothing to do with Zack Snyder or capeshit.
December 2, 2025 at 9:42 PM
I wasn’t trying to “pick a fight”. I typed his name out of a mix of boredom and curiosity and happened to notice your comment. The vast majority of my activity here has nothing to do with Zack Snyder or capeshit.
I mean, I wasn’t even responding to you. You’re entitled to your opinion. I was responding to the tired old “Zack Snyder hates altruism” talking point.
December 2, 2025 at 9:38 PM
I mean, I wasn’t even responding to you. You’re entitled to your opinion. I was responding to the tired old “Zack Snyder hates altruism” talking point.
Him continuing to call his predecessor “Sleepy Joe” when he’s publicly been seen falling asleep at meetings and events is peak Trump irony.
December 2, 2025 at 8:41 PM
Him continuing to call his predecessor “Sleepy Joe” when he’s publicly been seen falling asleep at meetings and events is peak Trump irony.
In fairness, I seriously doubt he wrote that. One of his staff members most likely wrote it on his behalf.
December 2, 2025 at 8:31 PM
In fairness, I seriously doubt he wrote that. One of his staff members most likely wrote it on his behalf.
I’m not sure how exactly it’s “pedantic” to point out when someone blatantly makes a bad faith observation about something.
December 2, 2025 at 8:12 PM
I’m not sure how exactly it’s “pedantic” to point out when someone blatantly makes a bad faith observation about something.