One of the things that I find infuriating about this article is that it makes clear that many researchers are clearly just citing papers that they have never read to support claims they are making. That’s not how this works. If you cite it, you need to have read it. Understood it. Agreed with it.

So many amazing artworks from *around* 1930 but the year itself seems pretty thin.

I like this though. Landscape with flowers - Zoltán Palugyay

Castrovalva by Escher a close runner up

It’s appalling. It’s not my workplace any more but I have many great colleagues there. They have destroyed Sociology, a foundation program for MQ. It seems that unionists & pro-Palestine activists were targeted. No other explanation makes sense.

I do love this building but it also feels like a great metaphor for the state of Australia’s universities.

Congrats! He’s beautiful!!

It’s certainly a choice

He doesn’t buy her anything though. He seems to think that bars are cool with people nominating random strangers to pay their bills.

Although to be fair I probably would be willing to pay this man to go away so maybe that is the part with the 90% success rate.