WTF are you talking about?

bsky.app/profile/will...

Which of the two big false prophets does he really worship?

Mohammed or Marx?

I've searched the OWID url & their src www.gov.uk/government/p... yet can't see disclosed what car occupancy they used to get the gCO2/pkm cited. If they use a standard (1.58) then it should be clarified that a car with 2 passengers is e.g. < bus travel in gCO2/pkm.

We don't put children at increased risk of drug interactions (and no, that risk has not be proven to be negligible) because of scheduling difficulties!

I've repeatedly asked the JCVI why it quietly reduced the recommended booster dose of the Moderna jab by 50% but it never replied.

No Prof Pagel- you don't get away with that extremely misleading claim.

PHE was replaced by the UKHSA - to say it was abolished is highly misleading.

www.gov.uk/government/o...

Just one simple example of this - parents were advised to make informed decisions on behalf of their children re getting the covid jab YET the useless-by-design Yellow Card System gave no data on age of the subject. Nothing about other drugs or illnesses. Nothing about much, much else.

Correction: The MHRA should regulate vaccines - something which it singularly and wilfully failed to do in the case of the covid jabs.
Its Yellow Card system was designed to fail and succeeded in being useless to the general public in making informed decisions about the covid jab.

Seems a valid claim to me but the great unspoken killer of the covid "pandemic" was stress.

Even the least ethical of experiments on the effects of prolonged stress on already compromised immune systems didn't dare inflict the protractedly high levels covid fear porn did.

Not sure but I think Elon Musk is funding a rival party to Reform UK called Advance UK.
www.gbnews.com/news/us/elon...
I'm not sure what you mean by "anti-vax" as I think you'll find vaccine uptake amongst those who declined the covid pseudovaccine was no lower than amongst those who got it.

You've been caught out using dishonest representation of data.

Playing the victim is the worst way out you could have chosen.

Shame on you - a sad day for science when it falls into the hands of the wrong people.

"typical recent months."

Do you listen to what you're posting?

If it isn't satellite data then it's blatant dishonesty to present it as high resolution when the real data coverage should be highly pixelated (and I mean extremely highly).

All this is so typical of climate science. Sad.

I asked for an EXACT URL - meaning not just that for the web site where somewhere you'll (hopefully) find the map created but a URL which takes me directly to it. It would have been nice anyway.

So to use a graphic suggesting such high resolution can only be consistent with citing a data source of much higher data density such as .....

Satellite data! (or relying on models to fill in the huge amount of missing data)

Do you get it now???