🎭Paris🎭
@weeweeparee.bsky.social
.generation jones. good-eye. mouthy. hairdresser. kind to animals. earth-tender. vintage toy collector. terrible proof reader. anti-orange. resistette.
-x Twitt 2009-2024.
-x Twitt 2009-2024.
That's why he put them all in there in the first place. The wheels on the bus go bumpity bump bump
November 25, 2025 at 7:16 PM
That's why he put them all in there in the first place. The wheels on the bus go bumpity bump bump
Where’s the Epstein files?
November 23, 2025 at 1:42 AM
Where’s the Epstein files?
Where’s the Epstein files
November 23, 2025 at 1:42 AM
Where’s the Epstein files
Yeah but thinking if Trump endorses or likes him, Dems won’t like him.
November 22, 2025 at 1:55 AM
Yeah but thinking if Trump endorses or likes him, Dems won’t like him.
And then call for political murder.
November 21, 2025 at 4:05 AM
And then call for political murder.
Reposted by 🎭Paris🎭
And all of this connects directly to the discussion here.
Right now, NIH institute directors are civil servants and experienced, top-expert scientists. That is the way NIH has run for decades.
It looks like Trump and Vought are planning to politicize those positions.
Right now, NIH institute directors are civil servants and experienced, top-expert scientists. That is the way NIH has run for decades.
It looks like Trump and Vought are planning to politicize those positions.
A bad thing is unfolding at NIH this week: It looks like the Trump administration is trying to replace key civil servant scientific leaders, the Institute Directors, with political hires. These directors control the NIH budget, tens of billions.
A bit of a video explainer here: 1/ 🧪
A bit of a video explainer here: 1/ 🧪
November 20, 2025 at 11:14 PM
And all of this connects directly to the discussion here.
Right now, NIH institute directors are civil servants and experienced, top-expert scientists. That is the way NIH has run for decades.
It looks like Trump and Vought are planning to politicize those positions.
Right now, NIH institute directors are civil servants and experienced, top-expert scientists. That is the way NIH has run for decades.
It looks like Trump and Vought are planning to politicize those positions.
Reposted by 🎭Paris🎭
Background: the NIH has operated for decades as effectively outside presidential control. Congress passed major priorities, and the president did not get to interfere much at all inside NIH. Expert civil servant scientists ran things, working closely with the external scientific community.
November 20, 2025 at 11:11 PM
Background: the NIH has operated for decades as effectively outside presidential control. Congress passed major priorities, and the president did not get to interfere much at all inside NIH. Expert civil servant scientists ran things, working closely with the external scientific community.
Reposted by 🎭Paris🎭
“[Institute Directors and program staff] may not rely on funding paylines.”
There are details here, but this part could be used to disempower peer reviewers—university scientists who review grants—and give decision-making power to Trump political appointees. (Bad.)
There are details here, but this part could be used to disempower peer reviewers—university scientists who review grants—and give decision-making power to Trump political appointees. (Bad.)
November 20, 2025 at 11:11 PM
“[Institute Directors and program staff] may not rely on funding paylines.”
There are details here, but this part could be used to disempower peer reviewers—university scientists who review grants—and give decision-making power to Trump political appointees. (Bad.)
There are details here, but this part could be used to disempower peer reviewers—university scientists who review grants—and give decision-making power to Trump political appointees. (Bad.)
Don’t care. Stupid bitch should get any attention.
November 20, 2025 at 9:51 PM
Don’t care. Stupid bitch should get any attention.
Reposted by 🎭Paris🎭
Except they’re covered legally by the speech and debate clause.
November 20, 2025 at 6:48 PM
Except they’re covered legally by the speech and debate clause.