viSvAs ವಿಶ್ವಾಸ್
@vishwasms.bsky.social
Agreed. Applicatives parallelize well. Also great for gathering all failures rather than early exit.
Syntax makes a big difference in how things are used.
I remember seeing a discussion where the introduction of flatMap to Validation was a mistake.
Syntax makes a big difference in how things are used.
I remember seeing a discussion where the introduction of flatMap to Validation was a mistake.
February 16, 2025 at 4:33 AM
Agreed. Applicatives parallelize well. Also great for gathering all failures rather than early exit.
Syntax makes a big difference in how things are used.
I remember seeing a discussion where the introduction of flatMap to Validation was a mistake.
Syntax makes a big difference in how things are used.
I remember seeing a discussion where the introduction of flatMap to Validation was a mistake.
In scalaz:
For bounded usage <*> was useful.
“sequence” was needed for list of applicatives.
Neither is as easy as “for yield” in scala or “do” in haskell.
In a codebase I worked on, people resorted to monadic style even if there were no dependencies.
tinyurl.com/ValidationAp...
For bounded usage <*> was useful.
“sequence” was needed for list of applicatives.
Neither is as easy as “for yield” in scala or “do” in haskell.
In a codebase I worked on, people resorted to monadic style even if there were no dependencies.
tinyurl.com/ValidationAp...
learning Scalaz — Applicative
tinyurl.com
February 15, 2025 at 10:13 PM
In scalaz:
For bounded usage <*> was useful.
“sequence” was needed for list of applicatives.
Neither is as easy as “for yield” in scala or “do” in haskell.
In a codebase I worked on, people resorted to monadic style even if there were no dependencies.
tinyurl.com/ValidationAp...
For bounded usage <*> was useful.
“sequence” was needed for list of applicatives.
Neither is as easy as “for yield” in scala or “do” in haskell.
In a codebase I worked on, people resorted to monadic style even if there were no dependencies.
tinyurl.com/ValidationAp...
Is this in person only or will there be an online link as well?
February 15, 2025 at 5:42 AM
Is this in person only or will there be an online link as well?
I did some Orc with Profs - Cook and Misra - at UT Austin around that time - It went nowhere but was interesting nonetheless.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orc_(pr...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orc_(pr...
Orc (programming language) - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
December 30, 2024 at 11:12 PM
I did some Orc with Profs - Cook and Misra - at UT Austin around that time - It went nowhere but was interesting nonetheless.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orc_(pr...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Orc_(pr...
‘Orc’hestrated clothing!
December 30, 2024 at 7:41 PM
‘Orc’hestrated clothing!
It’s well covered in en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dravidi...
The influences between the northern and southern styles are complex. If you have to see the northern ones, you may need to go to Aihole.
The influences between the northern and southern styles are complex. If you have to see the northern ones, you may need to go to Aihole.
Dravidian architecture - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
December 23, 2024 at 2:40 AM
It’s well covered in en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dravidi...
The influences between the northern and southern styles are complex. If you have to see the northern ones, you may need to go to Aihole.
The influences between the northern and southern styles are complex. If you have to see the northern ones, you may need to go to Aihole.
That’s 1 of 10 ways of explaining things [sic].
November 29, 2024 at 8:08 PM
That’s 1 of 10 ways of explaining things [sic].
Great. That’s useful to know..
November 23, 2024 at 11:39 PM
Great. That’s useful to know..
I had a similar question. You recommend fulgaz over rouvy?
November 23, 2024 at 8:55 PM
I had a similar question. You recommend fulgaz over rouvy?